<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Tennessee Gun Owners - 2nd Amendment Issues</title>
		<link>http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/</link>
		<description>This is the place to discuss  issues specifically regarding the Right To Keep and Bear Arms (RTKBA), only.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:42:06 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Chancellor nixes guns in "bars"]]></title>
			<link>http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/30638-chancellor-nixes-guns-bars.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:36:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Guns-in-bars law unconstitutional, says Nashville judge | tennessean.com | The Tennessean...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.tennessean.com/article/20091120/NEWS03/91120031/1001/NEWS" target="_blank">Guns-in-bars law unconstitutional, says Nashville judge | tennessean.com | The Tennessean</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/">2nd Amendment Issues</category>
			<dc:creator>BigPoppa</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/30638-chancellor-nixes-guns-bars.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Of interest to Murfreesboro TGO'ers]]></title>
			<link>http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/30629-interest-murfreesboro-tennessee-gun-ownersers.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:10:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Mayor Bragg and 3 Councilmen will be up for re-election in the Spring. 
  
Incumbents, others vie for city election on The Murfreesboro Post...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Mayor Bragg and 3 Councilmen will be up for re-election in the Spring.<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://www.murfreesboropost.com/incumbents-others-vie-for-city-election-cms-20504" target="_blank">Incumbents, others vie for city election on The Murfreesboro Post</a><br />
 <br />
All of these incumbents voted against legally armed, trained, background checked citizens carrying guns in city parks.....basically adopting a "they're safe enough" philosophy.<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://www.murfreesboropost.com/city-bans-guns-in-parks-cms-18082" target="_blank"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3"><font color="blue">http://www.murfreesboropost.com/city-bans-guns-in-parks-cms-18082</font></font></font></a><br />
 <br />
Vote your conscience, but keep this in mind in April.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/">2nd Amendment Issues</category>
			<dc:creator>BigPoppa</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/30629-interest-murfreesboro-tennessee-gun-ownersers.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Help With 2nd Question</title>
			<link>http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/30249-help-2nd-question.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:26:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Not being a Constitutional expert by any means, how should I interpret the part of the 2<SUP>nd</SUP> which states: “A well regulated militia being...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><font face="Verdana">Not being a Constitutional expert by any means, how should I interpret the part of the 2<SUP>nd</SUP> which states: “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State” ? <O:p</O:p</font><br />
 <br />
<font face="Verdana">In Virginia the terms “</font><font face="Verdana">trained to arms</font><font face="Verdana">” and <i>“</i></font><font face="Verdana">well-regulated militia</font><font face="Verdana"><i>”</i> appears in their Declaration of Rights. North Carolina’s states: </font><font face="Verdana"><i>“</i>That the people have a right to keep and bear arms; that a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state;<O:p</O:p</font><br />
 <br />
<font face="Verdana">So could we unite legally in defense of a free state?</font><O:p</O:p<br />
 <br />
<i><font color="#444444"><font face="Verdana">“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”</font></font></i><O:p</O:p</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/">2nd Amendment Issues</category>
			<dc:creator>KarlS</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/30249-help-2nd-question.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>http://www.infowars.com/obama-takes-first-step-in-banning-all-firearms/</title>
			<link>http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/30243-http-www-infowars-com-obama-takes-first-step-banning-all-firearms.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:45:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>hey guys ...lets get real..this@#@%# $^ wants to take our weapons.... read this!!!!!...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>hey guys ...lets get real..this@#@%# $^ wants to take our weapons.... read this!!!!!<br />
<a href="http://www.infowars.com/obama-takes-first-step-in-banning-all-firearms/" target="_blank">http://www.infowars.com/obama-takes-...-all-firearms/</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/">2nd Amendment Issues</category>
			<dc:creator>sammy9mmjudge</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/30243-http-www-infowars-com-obama-takes-first-step-banning-all-firearms.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Ray's / Tomo in Knoxville]]></title>
			<link>http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/30156-rays-tomo-knoxville.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:17:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Just wanted to let everyone know Ray's ESG is posted now.  I take out food from there because they are in the same shopping center as my store and...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Just wanted to let everyone know Ray's ESG is posted now.  I take out food from there because they are in the same shopping center as my store and they have good food.  I called in an order yesterday, locked up to walk over and when I arrived I noticed their sign (slash through the gun with "no guns allowed")  I turned around and walked back to my store.  I called them to let them know I would not be picking up my order.  The female on the phone asked why, and I explained that I saw their sign and would not be eating there anymore.  She hung up on me.  On a brighter note, Tomo next door to me is not posted, so I guess they will be getting more of my business now.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/">2nd Amendment Issues</category>
			<dc:creator>Caveman</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/30156-rays-tomo-knoxville.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>UPS......LEARN YOUR POLICY!!!!!!</title>
			<link>http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/30125-ups-learn-your-policy.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:18:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Went to ship a gun at UPS main hub off Briley PKY and I first got the old you need to have a copy of the persons FFL and then it eroded into the gun...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Went to ship a gun at UPS main hub off Briley PKY and I first got the old you need to have a copy of the persons FFL and then it eroded into the gun can only be shipped from FFL to FFL. Had to wait 40 mins for the security guy to come and then had to call my smith and my guy rattled off his FFL number and then they shipped it. Like they even knew it was a valid FFL number. What a joke. They don't even know their own policy. <br />
<br />
I have shipped guns from there a bunch of times and this is the first round of BS from UPS. I have experienced the same from Fed-Ex a bunch of times.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/">2nd Amendment Issues</category>
			<dc:creator>timcalhoun</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/30125-ups-learn-your-policy.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Get ready for new gun laws!</title>
			<link>http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/29970-get-ready-new-gun-laws.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:10:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Two major shootouts in as many days. I have a feeling there will be more in coming days, sadly. Then a serious push for a bunch more anti-gun laws...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Two major shootouts in as many days. I have a feeling there will be more in coming days, sadly. Then a serious push for a bunch more anti-gun laws banning all guns, ammo and gun ownership. Because all guns are bad and if just eliminate the guns we'll have no crime! :tinfoil:</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/">2nd Amendment Issues</category>
			<dc:creator>JoeNashville</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/29970-get-ready-new-gun-laws.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BATFE ACKNOWLEDGES A NATIONWIDE DATABASE OF GUN OWNERS</title>
			<link>http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/29967-batfe-acknowledges-nationwide-database-gun-owners.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:28:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[The New Jersey Democratic State Committee - The Democratic Party of New Jersey (http://www.njdems.org/press_display.php?ID=169) 
  
<!--StartFragment...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.njdems.org/press_display.php?ID=169" target="_blank">The New Jersey Democratic State Committee - The Democratic Party of New Jersey</a><br />
 <br />
<!--StartFragment --><font size="2">"E-trace is a nationwide database maintained by the ATF that lists<br />
a firearm's first purchaser, date of purchase and the retailer from<br />
which it was purchased. The information is compiled from police<br />
records of gun purchases provided by local departments, but until<br />
today was only accessible by the ATF and the police department that<br />
provided it." Read all of this article from August 2007  -<br />
<a href="http://www.jpfo.org/articles-assd/etrace-nj.htm" target="_blank">Governor Announces Historic Partnership with ATF to Trace Illegal Firearms</a></font></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/">2nd Amendment Issues</category>
			<dc:creator>Tim Nunan</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/29967-batfe-acknowledges-nationwide-database-gun-owners.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>good read on the upcoming Chicago litigation</title>
			<link>http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/29957-good-read-upcoming-chicago-litigation.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:20:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://volokh.com/2009/11/06/georgetown-panel-on-mcdonald-the-privileges-or-immunities-clause/ 
 
 
He writes on this issue many times and they are...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://volokh.com/2009/11/06/georgetown-panel-on-mcdonald-the-privileges-or-immunities-clause/" target="_blank">http://volokh.com/2009/11/06/georget...nities-clause/</a><br />
<br />
<br />
He writes on this issue many times and they are very insightful.<br />
<br />
R</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/">2nd Amendment Issues</category>
			<dc:creator>colrmccoll</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/29957-good-read-upcoming-chicago-litigation.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NO WAY I cant be, its not possible</title>
			<link>http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/29915-no-way-i-cant-its-not-possible.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:10:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>How can it be possible that kids in the city of Memphis keep getting shot in Memphis City Parks and on Memphis School Property ???? 
 
Guns are...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>How can it be possible that kids in the city of Memphis keep getting shot in Memphis City Parks and on Memphis School Property ????<br />
<br />
Guns are banned in those places .......<br />
<br />
:)</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/">2nd Amendment Issues</category>
			<dc:creator>jcramin</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/29915-no-way-i-cant-its-not-possible.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Anyone see this poll at USA Today? Vote!</title>
			<link>http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/29601-anyone-see-poll-usa-today-vote.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:00:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>USATODAY.com - Quick Question (http://www.usatoday.com/news/quickquestion/2007/november/popup5895.htm) 
  
You can vote as many times as you like if...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/quickquestion/2007/november/popup5895.htm" target="_blank">USATODAY.com - Quick Question</a><br />
 <br />
You can vote as many times as you like if you close the link and go back in after each vote.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/">2nd Amendment Issues</category>
			<dc:creator>SWJewellTN</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/29601-anyone-see-poll-usa-today-vote.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Tennessee Attorney General Says Landlords Can Ban Tenants' Guns]]></title>
			<link>http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/29548-tennessee-attorney-general-says-landlords-can-ban-tenants-guns.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:10:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>*S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E 
*OFFICE OF THE 
*ATTORNEY GENERAL 
PO BOX 20207 
NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37202 
*October 26, 2009 
Opinion No. 09-170...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><b><font face="Times New Roman"><div align="left">S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E</div></font></b><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2"><div align="left">OFFICE OF THE</div></font></font></font></font><b><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2"><div align="left">ATTORNEY GENERAL<br />
PO BOX 20207<br />
NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37202</div></font></font></font></font></b><font face="Times New Roman"><div align="left">October 26, 2009<br />
Opinion No. 09-170<br />
Firearms, Vehicle Towing, Guests, and Security Deposits on Leased Property</div></font><b><font face="Times New Roman"><div align="left">QUESTIONS</div></font></b><font face="Times New Roman"><div align="left">1. Can a landlord prohibit tenants who possess valid handgun carry permits from<br />
possessing firearms in the apartment if the tenant has a permit issued by the State?<br />
2. If there is a clause in an apartment lease that prohibits the possession of firearms<br />
within the leased space, is a landlord also required to post signs that satisfy the requirement of<br />
Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1359 to effectively prohibit such possession on property owned by the<br />
landlord?<br />
3. If the landlord chooses to post signs prohibiting firearms on the property pursuant to<br />
Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1359, is the landlord required to post a sign at each individual<br />
apartment or common area?<br />
4. Does Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-518(b) require landlords to use specific language in<br />
restricted parking signs to be able to immediately tow unauthorized vehicles?<br />
5. May a landlord avoid both the notice and signage requirement set forth in Tenn. Code<br />
Ann. § 66-28-518 by using a clause in a lease that authorizes the landlord to immediately tow an<br />
unauthorized vehicle that is parked on the property?<br />
6. Does a landlord have the authority to prohibit a person from entering the property to<br />
visit a tenant within the confines of the leased space?<br />
7. Does the failure of a landlord to list the estimated dollar cost of any repairs necessary<br />
prior to the signature of both parties on the damage listing preclude the landlord from collecting<br />
repair costs from the tenant pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-301?</div></font><b><font face="Times New Roman"><div align="left">OPINIONS</div></font></b><font face="Times New Roman"><div align="left">1. A landlord can prohibit tenants, including those who hold handgun carry permits,<br />
from possessing firearms within the leased premises. Such a prohibition may be imposed<br />
through a clause in the lease, or, in counties where the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant<br />
Act, Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 66-28-101 to 66-28-501, is in effect, such a prohibition may be<br />
imposed by adopting a rule that satisfies the requirements of Tenn. Code Ann. § 68-28-402.<br />
Page 2<br />
2. A landlord who prohibits firearms through a lease or property rule would not be<br />
required to post signs that satisfy the requirements set forth in Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1359.<br />
However, if the landlord does not post such signs, persons who violate the prohibition would not<br />
be subject to criminal prosecution for violating Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1359.<br />
3. Property owners who elect to posts signs that give notice that the possession of<br />
firearms is prohibited on their property must post the signs at all public entrances to the property<br />
or area where firearms are prohibited. The location where these signs must be erected to satisfy<br />
the requirements set forth in Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1359 would depend on the layout of the<br />
property in question.<br />
4. No particular wording is required by Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-518(b) to appear in<br />
the landlord’s posted signs announcing the landlord’s parking rules. Any sign giving reasonable<br />
notice of the landlord’s parking rules will suffice.<br />
5. Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-201(a) prohibits a landlord from using a clause in a lease to<br />
circumvent the requirement that signs be posted in parking areas before a landlord may<br />
immediately tow vehicles that are parked in violation of the landlord’s parking policy. Tenn.<br />
Code Ann. § 66-28-518.<br />
6. A landlord may prohibit a guest of a tenant from coming onto the property if there is<br />
a clause in the lease authorizing the landlord to take such action.<br />
7. Under Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-301(b) a landlord cannot retain a security deposit if<br />
the landlord fails to give the tenant a written estimate of the cost of repairs. However, the tenant<br />
would still be liable for the cost of any damages to the property. Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-<br />
301(g).</div></font><b><font face="Times New Roman"><div align="left">ANALYSIS</div></font></b><font face="Times New Roman"><div align="left">1. You ask if a landlord may prohibit tenants, including holders of handgun carry<br />
permits, from possessing firearms on the leasehold. The relationship between a landlord and<br />
tenant in Tennessee is governed by the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (“the<br />
Act”) in counties where it applies,</div></font><div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="1"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="1">1 </font></font></font></font><font face="Times New Roman">Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 66-28-101 to 66-28-521, and by<br />
general principles of contract and real property law. </font><i><font face="Times New Roman">Planters Gin Co. v. Fed. Compress &amp;<br />
Warehouse Co.</font></i><font face="Times New Roman">, 78 S.W.3d 885, 889-90 (Tenn. 2002); </font><i><font face="Times New Roman">Ryan v. Stanger Inv. Co.</font></i><font face="Times New Roman">, 620 S.W.2d<br />
505, 508 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1981).<br />
Under both case law and the Act, a landlord and tenant are free to establish terms<br />
governing the use of the property. Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-201(a); </font><i><font face="Times New Roman">Planters Gin Co. v. Fed.</font></i></div><i><font face="Times New Roman"><br />
</font></i><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="1"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="1"><div align="left">1 </div></font></font></font></font><div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2">The Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 66-28-101 to 66-28-521, is only<br />
applicable to counties having a population of more than 68,000 according to the 1970 federal census or any<br />
subsequent federal census. Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-102(a). Prior to October 1, 2008, the Act was only applicable<br />
in certain counties that fell within specific population brackets. In these counties where the Act first became<br />
applicable on October 1, 2008, it applies to rental agreements entered into, extended, or renewed after that date.<br />
2008 Pub. Acts. Ch. 1067, § 4.</font></font></font></font></div><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2"><br />
</font></font></font></font><font face="Times New Roman"><div align="left">Page 3</div></font><i><font face="Times New Roman"><div align="left">Compress &amp; Warehouse Co.</div></font></i><div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman">, 78 S.W.3d 885, 889-90 (Tenn. 2002). A landlord and a tenant<br />
may, therefore, mutually agree through a lease to prohibit the possession of firearms on the<br />
premises. Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-201(a).<br />
Under the Act, a landlord may also prohibit firearms by adopting a rule that satisfies the<br />
requirements of Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-402(a). It states:<br />
A landlord, from time to time, may adopt rules or regulations, however<br />
described, concerning the tenant’s use and occupancy of the premises. It<br />
is enforceable against the tenant only if: (1) Its purpose is to promote the<br />
convenience, safety, or welfare of the tenants in the premises, preserve the<br />
landlord’s property from abusive use, or make a fair distribution of the<br />
services and facilities held out for the tenants generally; (2) It is<br />
reasonably related to the purpose for which it is adopted; (3) It applies to<br />
all tenants in the premises; (4) It is sufficiently explicit in its prohibition,<br />
direction, or limitation of the tenant’s conduct to fairly inform the tenant<br />
of what the tenant must or must not do to comply; (5) It is not for the<br />
purpose of evading the obligations of the landlord; and (6) The tenant has<br />
notice of it at the time the tenant enters into the rental agreement.<br />
If the landlord complies with the requirements of Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-402(a), and that rule<br />
is in effect at the time the lease is executed, then the rule will be enforceable.</font><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="1"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="1">2</font></font></font></font></div><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="1"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="1"><br />
</font></font></font></font><font face="Times New Roman"><div align="left">You also ask if a tenant who holds a valid handgun carry permit could possess a firearm<br />
on property notwithstanding a clause prohibiting the possession of firearms on the leasehold.<br />
Handgun carry permits authorize holders to carry a firearm in public for the purpose of going<br />
armed. Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1308. Under the general principles of contract law, a tenant<br />
can contractually agree to give up rights as long as the waiver is not unconscionable, Tenn. Code<br />
Ann. § 66-28-204, or in violation of a statute. </div></font><div align="left"><i><font face="Times New Roman">See, e.g. Freeman v. Thompson</font></i><font face="Times New Roman">, 600 S.W.2d 234,<br />
236 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1979). A lease provision forbidding the possession of firearms on the<br />
leased premises is neither.<br />
2. You ask whether landlords may prohibit the possession of firearms on their properties<br />
without having to post a notice as specified in Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1359. That statute<br />
authorizes property owners to prohibit weapons on their property by prominently posting notices<br />
at all public entrances to the property. Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1359(a). It is a misdemeanor<br />
offense to carry a firearm on property where such signs are posted. Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-17-<br />
1358(b) and 39-17-1359.<br />
As discussed above, landlords may prohibit firearms on leased premises through a clause<br />
in the lease or by enacting a rule before the execution of the lease. Such a clause or rule would<br />
impose a contractual obligation upon the tenant, and a violation of that obligation would<br />
constitute a breach of the lease. If such a breach occurred, the landlord could resort to civil</font></div><font face="Times New Roman"><br />
</font><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="1"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="1"><div align="left">2 </div></font></font></font></font><div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2">Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-402(b) also allows a landlord to adopt a rule or regulation after execution of the rental<br />
agreement “if reasonable notice of its adoption is given to the tenant and it does not work a substantial modification<br />
to the rental agreement.”</font></font></font></font></div><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2"><br />
</font></font></font></font><font face="Times New Roman"><div align="left">Page 4<br />
remedies to enforce the terms of the lease. Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-505. By posting the signs<br />
as set forth in Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1359, a landlord could also subject a tenant to criminal<br />
penalties.<br />
3. You have asked if a landlord who elects to posts signs pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann.<br />
§ 39-17-1359 would be required to post a sign on the door of each living unit. To prohibit<br />
firearms under Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1359(a), a property owner must post signs “in<br />
prominent locations, including all entrances primarily used by persons entering the building,<br />
portion of the building or buildings where weapon possession is prohibited.” The sign must be<br />
“plainly visible to the average person entering the building, premises, or property.” </div></font><div align="left"><i><font face="Times New Roman">Id.</font></i></div><i><font face="Times New Roman"><br />
</font></i><font face="Times New Roman"><div align="left">Under the rules of statutory construction, if the language is plain and unambiguous, the<br />
plain meaning of the statute should be applied. </div></font><div align="left"><i><font face="Times New Roman">Brown v. Erachem Comilog, Inc., </font></i><font face="Times New Roman">231 S.W.3d<br />
918 (Tenn. 2007). Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1359(a) unambiguously states that the signs must<br />
be plainly visible at each public entrance to the area where firearms are prohibited. The exact<br />
location where signs would be required to be posted would depend on the facts and<br />
circumstances of each case.<br />
4. You ask whether Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-518(b) requires that signs posted to give<br />
notice of a landlord’s parking rules must contain a particular form of words in order to enable a<br />
landlord to immediately tow vehicles parked in violation of the rules. Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-<br />
518(b) states:<br />
A landlord may have a tenant’s, occupant’s, tenant’s guest’s, or<br />
trespasser’s vehicle immediately towed or otherwise removed from such<br />
real property, without notice, if and when such person fails to comply with<br />
the landlord’s permit parking policy as defined in the landlord’s posted<br />
signage.<br />
This statute does not prescribe any specific language that a landlord should use in posting a<br />
permit parking policy sign. </font><i><font face="Times New Roman">Id</font></i><font face="Times New Roman">. You also asked if a sign that says “TENANT PARKING<br />
ONLY” would satisfy the legislature’s intent and allow a landlord to tow a non-tenant’s vehicle<br />
parked on the premises. Under the rules of statutory construction, statutes should be interpreted<br />
so as to give effect to the intent of the legislature. </font><i><font face="Times New Roman">State v. Hannah</font></i><font face="Times New Roman">, 259 S.W.3d 716 (Tenn.<br />
2008). Under this statute, the legislature requires landlords to give automobile owners notice,<br />
through a posted parking permit policy, where they may legally park on the property before the<br />
vehicle can be towed. A “TENANT PARKING ONLY” sign would give sufficient notice that<br />
parking by non-tenants is unauthorized. Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-518(b) does not explicitly<br />
require that the posted parking permit policy include notice that unauthorized automobiles are<br />
subject to immediate towing.<br />
5. You have asked if the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act permits a<br />
landlord to immediately tow unauthorized vehicles where the signs required under Tenn. Code<br />
Ann. § 66-28-518(b) have not been posted, if the facility’s parking policy is set forth within the<br />
lease.<br />
Page 5<br />
Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-518 regulates the towing of vehicles by landlords. A<br />
landlord’s right to tow an unauthorized vehicle depends on whether the landlord has posted signs<br />
displaying the property’s parking rules. If the landlord posts such signs, then any vehicle in<br />
violation of those rules, whether it be owned by a tenant, occupant, guest, or trespasser, can be<br />
towed immediately. Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-518(b). If signs are not posted, then the landlord<br />
may only tow the unauthorized vehicle ten days after posting a written notice on the vehicle.<br />
Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-518(a).</font><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="1"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="1">3</font></font></font></font></div><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="1"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="1"><br />
</font></font></font></font><font face="Times New Roman"><div align="left">Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-201(a) prohibits the use of rental agreements to waive or<br />
forego rights or remedies that are afforded by the Act. Tenn Code Ann § 66-28-518 sets out the<br />
conditions under which a landlord may resort to the towing of an automobile as a remedy for<br />
violation of the landlord’s parking rules. Any attempt to use a lease term to waive the signage<br />
posting requirements or otherwise modify the statutory remedies would violate Tenn. Code Ann.<br />
§§ 66-28-201(a) and 66-28-518 and would therefore be ineffective.<br />
6. You have asked if a landlord can prohibit a guest of a tenant from visiting the<br />
tenant’s leased premises. Absent a clause in the lease which gives the landlord power to limit<br />
visitors, a tenant can freely invite any person onto the property. The right to quiet enjoyment of<br />
the property is an implied term of every lease. </div></font><div align="left"><i><font face="Times New Roman">Couch v. Hall</font></i><font face="Times New Roman">, 412 S.W.2d 635, 637 (Tenn.<br />
1967); </font><i><font face="Times New Roman">Marshall v. Summers</font></i><font face="Times New Roman">, 934 S.W.2d 647, 650 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). The right of quiet<br />
enjoyment affords tenants with an exclusive right to occupy and use the property as they see fit,<br />
subject only to the terms of the lease. </font><i><font face="Times New Roman">Southern Bell Tel. &amp; Tel. Co. v. Yates</font></i><font face="Times New Roman">, 232 S.W.2d 796,<br />
798-99 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1950). The right to quiet enjoyment of the property, however, may be<br />
modified or limited by express provisions in the lease. </font><i><font face="Times New Roman">O’Connor</font></i><font face="Times New Roman">, 75 Tenn. at 223.<br />
A lease may contain a provision that restricts the right of tenants to invite certain classes<br />
of guests, such as convicted felons,</font><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="1"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="1">4 </font></font></font></font><font face="Times New Roman">or limits the length of time a guest may remain. Absent<br />
such restrictions, the right to quiet enjoyment would afford a tenant with the right to invite<br />
whomever the tenant desires onto the property, free from the landlord’s oversight.<br />
7. You ask if a landlord will forfeit any claim for damages to leased premises because of<br />
a failure to provide the tenant with a damage cost estimate at the time the lease is terminated.<br />
Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-301(b)(1) states that upon termination of the leasehold, “[t]he landlord<br />
shall inspect the premises and compile a comprehensive listing of any damage to the unit that is<br />
the basis for any charge against the security deposit and the estimated dollar cost of repairing the<br />
damage. . . .” Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-301(c) states, in part, “No landlord shall be entitled to<br />
retain any portion of the security deposit . . . if the final damage listing required by subsection<br />
(b) is not provided.”</font></div><font face="Times New Roman"><br />
</font><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="1"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="1"><div align="left">3 </div></font></font></font></font><div align="left"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2">A landlord may also tow a vehicle ten days after posting notice on the vehicle if the vehicle has flat or missing<br />
tires, is not operational, has a missing or broken windshield, is missing any fenders or bumpers, or has been out of<br />
compliance with state and local vehicle tag registration for more than thirty days. Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-519. A<br />
landlord can tow a “nuisance vehicle” 24 hours after posting notice on the vehicle. Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-520.</font></font></font></font></div><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2"><br />
</font></font></font></font><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="1"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="1"><div align="left">4 </div></font></font></font></font><div align="left"><i><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2">See, e.g., Ross v. Broadway Towers, Inc., </font></font></font></font></i><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2">228 S.W.3d 113, 123 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006) (public housing resident<br />
could be evicted for having live-in caretaker who was a convicted felon, in violation of lease terms).</font></font></font></font></div><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2"><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2"><br />
</font></font></font></font><font face="Times New Roman"><div align="left">Page 6<br />
By its terms, Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-301(c) prohibits a landlord from retaining a<br />
security deposit if no written estimate of damages is given to the tenant at the time a lease is<br />
terminated. There is nothing in the statute to indicate that the failure to provide such a list of<br />
damages releases the tenant from any liability. To the contrary, Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-301(g)<br />
preserves the landlord’s right to recover from the tenant any damages that the landlord is entitled<br />
to receive under the Act. This would include recovery of the cost of any cleaning needed to<br />
restore the property to its pre-rental condition, Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-401(2), and the cost of<br />
repairing damage intentionally or negligently caused to the property by the tenant, Tenn. Code<br />
Ann. § 66-28-401(4), as well as any other claims available to the landlord under the lease. Tenn.<br />
Code Ann. § 66-28-505(c).<br />
ROBERT E. COOPER, JR.<br />
Attorney General and Reporter<br />
MICHAEL E. MOORE<br />
Solicitor General<br />
BENJAMIN A. WHITEHOUSE<br />
Assistant Attorney General<br />
Requested by:<br />
Honorable Tony Shipley<br />
State Representative<br />
204 War Memorial Building<br />
Nashville, TN 37243</div></font></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/">2nd Amendment Issues</category>
			<dc:creator>GLOCKMEISTER</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/29548-tennessee-attorney-general-says-landlords-can-ban-tenants-guns.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Carrying at West Town Wine & Spirits]]></title>
			<link>http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/29522-carrying-west-town-wine-spirits.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:26:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I would like to let everyone know that my store (West Town Wine & Spirits) in Knoxville supports our 2nd Amendment rights and you are welcome to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I would like to let everyone know that my store (West Town Wine &amp; Spirits) in Knoxville supports our 2nd Amendment rights and you are welcome to carry here.  Furthermore, I would like to offer a discount to all members of <acronym title="Tennessee Gun Owners">TGO</acronym>.  We are located in the West Hills Crossing shopping center down from West Town Mall.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/">2nd Amendment Issues</category>
			<dc:creator>Caveman</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/29522-carrying-west-town-wine-spirits.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>2nd Amendment March</title>
			<link>http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/29271-2nd-amendment-march.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:05:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[A lady drove all the way from Michigan to attend the 2nd or None event we recently had. She represented an organization that's planning a march on...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>A lady drove all the way from Michigan to attend the 2nd or None event we recently had. She represented an organization that's planning a march on Washington D.C. on April 19, 2010 on the grounds of the Washington Monument.<br />
Here's a link to their website.<br />
<a href="http://secondamendmentmarch.com/" target="_blank">Official site of the Second Amendment March</a><br />
 <br />
Take a look whether you can attend or not. This is an all volunteer grassroots group trying to support our RTKBA.<br />
I'm not affiliated with them, I just think we need to protect our rights and help those that are doing the same.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/">2nd Amendment Issues</category>
			<dc:creator>PapaB</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/2nd-amendment-issues/29271-2nd-amendment-march.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
