E4 No More

We aren't in New York. It's your body, and you have the power to insist on what's done with it. You also have the ability to sue for negligence and harm - not speaking of the doctors per se here. It's called, practicing medicine without a license.

I honestly don't understand why some people are so predisposed to believe the media these days. How about listening to YOUR doctor?

A couple hundred years ago, cutting edge science was to perform blood-letting and leeches. Ignoring the crazy doctor, it's very foolish to ignore the power that the AMA has over their doctors and the power that pharmaceutical companies have over the AMA. The only valid study is one that is a double-blind study of a broad pool of patients. Ask yourself why this isn't being done.

When liberals get together. It explains why they're opposed to guns.

The stock is pretty sweet!

"Twiddly bits"? "Some tit"? Can you translate that into American English language?

I've had a rule of engagement with my wife for the past 42 years: She doesn't hit me in the nuts, and I won't hit her anywhere. I've never hit my wife...on purpose.

And that is why it will continue to happen all across the country. EDIT: To be clear, I don't know what I would do. I wasn't trained to absorb an unjustified assault from anyone. I was trained not to hit a lady, but she isn't a lady. I'm about her age too.

Another thing to consider is if you have chronic asthma or COPD and getting that crap in your lungs. That may not work out for you too well.

You seem to be focusing on the guy that was sprayed; not you. Tell me what you would do if someone pepper-sprayed YOU without justification. I get that you are worried about her age. I get that many of our daddies taught us not to hit either a lady, or a woman. Heck, I was taught not to hit a lady, and I have never hit either unless you count accidents. As I said before, the police aren't likely to expend much effort investigating this crime - particularly in a large city - unless there are cooperative witnesses and a positive ID of the assailant, so it seems to me that you either effectively walk away, or you assault back. Personally, I growing tired of seeing liberals assault people and nothing is done about it.

Actually, the Capsaicin in the spray is a neurotoxin.

So you don't view being sprayed with pepper spray as being physical?

Yes, there are pockets in every state - like Austin in Texas. But we don't have two months of riots going unchecked in Tennessee.

Or Illinois, New Jersey, Washington, Oregon, etc.

If you ain't bleeding and the suspect ain't there you shouldn't expect the police to do much investigation. You might as well say that you'd walk away and blow it off.

So if someone assaults you, you wouldn't fight back? If someone shoots you would you not reciprocate? EDIT: BTW, pepper spray comes in various strengths. Bear strength is fairly common, and will eff you up pretty bad.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/video-pepper-spray-coronavirus-mask-san-diego-dog-park I saw this story today and it got me to thinking. If you were assaulted, (which is what it is when you spray someone with pepper spray without the context of self-defense), what would you do? I was raised that you never hit a lady, but does a lady assault someone without just cause? Does age allow you to assault someone without cause? Does sex allow you to assault someone without cause? Do you walk away, call the police, or assault back?

Nope, he said he had it down to drink water, You don't drink water from your lap unless you are a very good contortionist.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/dr-fauci-responds-photographed-mask-off Fauci is claiming that he was dehydrated and drinking water. Obviously, he's not holding water. Another Fauci lie.

That depends on the type of rechargeable batteries. Nickel Metal Hydride batteries would have to go through conditioning cycles every once in a while. Ni-Cad was worse IIRC. Most rechargeables that I've seen today use Lithium. EDIT: The drawback to Lithium is that there's not the warning of dimming when the battery runs out of juice. It just drops you like a brick.

What a shame.

Or sealed goggles. Oo, or fully enclosed bio-suits!

I have the sudden urge to go motor-boat'n!

Woops! https://www.foxnews.com/us/these-n95-masks-arent-likely-stop-coronavirus “Given that most of the value of these masks is not to protect the wearer but to protect others from a potentially contagious asymptomatic wearer, those one-way valves make the masks practically useless for protecting others....”

And which "science" would that be? I ask because "science" has been giving us conflicting information. Example: We were told that the virus is genetically stable making an eventual vaccine possible, but other reports say it's mutating easily like a cold virus does. I also find it humorous that people will throw out the word "science" as if that is the trump card of truth. Scientists are wrong a lot. Scientist are all about shouting their theories and mumbling their retractions, and when you call them on it they simply say, "We were acting on the best evidence that we had at the time." They've even gone as far as to preempt being wrong by removing "scientific laws" from their verbiage so that they are covered in the event they are later proven wrong, or to justify a hypothesis like, "Gravity didn't exist in the singularity." Science has even replaced religion for many people, and they don't even realize it. For example, they preach that all of the matter in the universe was compressed into a singularity, and that thermodynamics and gravity didn't exist. Many don't question this because scientists said it was so, but those same people will attack people of faith for doing the same thing. Their god is science, and they'll believe ANYTHING as long as the word "science" is attached to it. Don't get me wrong: science is mostly good, but it is not absolute.