Jump to content

DaveTN

Active Member
  • Posts

    17,782
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    165
  • Feedback

    100%

Posts posted by DaveTN

  1. 50 minutes ago, MacGyver said:

    While there’s a conversation to be had about future proofing on the i7 vs i9, if you’re looking at price differentials - most of the performance that a gamer would probably care about would come from spending that money upgrading the graphics card.

    Memory and processing power offloaded to that discrete card are likely to net him a lot more than just the CPU itself. 

    Yes, the graphics card will be the key and I don’t expect to skimp. I don’t mind paying the money for the i9, I just want to make sure I’m not picking the wrong processor for gaming.

  2. That’s a great picture Greyfox. I had people at work ask “How do people up North drive in all that snow?” I usually replied “Well you know, there are speeds besides 5 and 70.”

    Light dusting here in Murfreesboro this morning. 

    One thing great about when it snows here; I take the stand “God put it there, and God will take it away”. My snow shoveling days are behind me.

    • Like 3
  3. My grandson ask me about building him a gaming PC. I have built several PC’s but its been a few years. I’m considering supervising him building one. I know I could probably buy for close to the cost of what it would be to build one, but I think that’s a skill set people need to have.

    In checking things out lately I see a lot of conflicting info on the i9 for gaming. Some appear to be trying to justify the i7 because of the substantial cost difference of the i9. Others have said the i9, while performing better in a workstation for CAD or graphics intense applications, be may be slower than the i7 for gaming.

    Taking the price out of the equation, I would think a i9 should perform better than an i7. But I’m not a gamer.

    What do you guys think? Anyone built their own gaming PC based on the i9?

  4. I’m a little surprised to see that out of Ky Guns. I used them for the first time last month on a S&W 610. I felt like they bent me over a little bit, but not that bad compared to what I saw elsewhere, certainly nothing like that Python pricing. When I was looking for a S&W Model 41 last year, they had the lowest price of anyone. Lower than people were asking for used. But of course things are different now.

    But GAG is doing pretty much the same. They have set their plain jane 6” 686 (164224) price at MSRP. Which is almost 30% higher than it was in January. And they don’t have it; so it may be more when they do.

    Having said that I owned three “vintage” Pythons back in the late 70’s, early 80's. Of course they weren’t vintage then. And I’ve owned countless S&W’s in the L,K variety. And so should you. Everyone should try both and make your own decision.

    I’ll take a 686 over a Python any day, but its because I can shoot a S&W better than a Colt. As a matter of fact at a Police Match in the 80’s I got so pizzed off at my 6” Python, for the 2nd match I pulled my 4” 686 duty gun out of the trunk and used it; outshot the Python hands down. But that was me; not the guns.

    As far as value goes…. who knows. Will a 2020 Python hold its value as well as a vintage Python? Who knows. Never in the past has a post-Lock 686 had the value of a Pre-Lock. They do today. As I matter of fact I see new or slightly used 686’s with asking prices higher than a Pre-Locks. Who knew? Would I pay twice the price of a new 686 for a new Python? Of course not. But it looks like some folks will if they want one.

    Do I wish I had kept those three Pythons? Of course I could sell them to you guys and buy ....oh..maybe a Barrett. 

    Here is a video of Hickok45 comparing the 686 and 2020 Python. He stops short of saying he would pick a 686 over a Python, but you can tell that’s how he feels.

     

     

  5. 16 minutes ago, Erik88 said:

    It really isn't that simple. Healthy people are unintentionally and unknowingly spreading the virus to people that really can't afford to have it. It has nothing to do with being scared of the virus. I would think that losing a long time member that was only 65 would have had some sort of impact on folks but I thought wrong. 

    That "just stay home if you're scared" argument doesn't work for everyone.  Many still need groceries and have errands to run. If you think that's an option, have you offered to help any of your elderly neighbors? 

    So go get your groceries, wear a mask, gloves, use sanitizer, wash your hands and face. What's the problem?

    What do you want to do?

    How long do you think our economy can with stand this crisis?

    What do you want to do with people that are out there not wearing their mask?

    • Like 1
  6. Prior to Covid my hair was kept short. I haven’t had a haircut since this started and it is down to my shoulders. I feel that getting a haircut with someone standing over you and putting their hands all over you face is about as personal as it gets. But I don’t think the shops should be closed and if someone wants to get a haircut; they should be able to.

    I feel the same about restaurants and other business. If they want to stay open and people want to go to them; they should be able to do that. Even though I won’t do it.

    What happened to personal responsibility? It’s your responsibility to stay away from places and people that may/may not make you sick.

    I see too many people that have constantly spouted off about not needing/wanting the government to protect them; all of a sudden wanting the government to close businesses and destroy peoples livelihoods and jobs to protect them. What changed?

    I wear a mask. Most people are getting their hackles up not because of wearing a mask; but the threats of punitive action if they don’t. Private businesses open to the public have the right to post that they won’t allow you on the premises without a mask. I see no problem with that. Why does the government need to be involved?

    Luckily I’m retired and this isn’t hitting me as hard as some others. Other than the fact that my wife still works and it will probably only me a matter of time before she is exposed, which in turn will expose me.

    But there was a time in my life when I was living paycheck to paycheck trying to support a family. I can’t imagine what its like for people in that situation that have had their income cutoff or greatly reduced.

     

    • Like 5
  7. 15 hours ago, Mowgli-Terry said:

    The extra checks involved waits and applications to FBI etc. Firearms and permits had been gotten with the same history. All of a sudden there is a problem. That was the new search. All this stuff came out of nowhere.

    Sure, but I don’t think there were any additional checks. What I suspect happened on mine was that one person saw it and said “That’s decades old, and isn’t a disqualifier even with a conviction” and approved it.

    The next time someone saw it and said “Danger, Danger Will Robinson! That’s a weapons violation and even though its decades old, and a misdemeanor; it could be a felony in this state!!" And denied it. Then someone with more sense reviewed it on appeal and approved it.

    But that just a wild azz guess.

    • Like 1
  8. 7 hours ago, hipower said:

    Been in that spot. Got caught cleaning pistols on the kitchen table.

    It was the Hoppes 9 that gave me away.

    My wife gets terrible migraines that can be brought on by lights or smells. I was using Hoppes #9. She said if I going to have to that out in the garage. I switched to M-Pro 7 and I’m back to doing it in the house with no repercussions.

    • Like 1
  9. 5 hours ago, hipower said:

    Sort of what I'm thinking. But I just reallllllly hate verifying what they may already know.

    Which is why after thinking on it a bit, I decided not to post on the Letter.

    As someone said, just made a nice starting point for collections.

    I'm sort of thinking this, if I have to SBR; why arm brace? Just put a stock on and be done.

    If, and when, I'll have to decide on which and what to keep

    I don’t think collections will ever be an issue. But that’s just my opinion. One turning up on a traffic stop or other type encounter with the Police could be. I’m thinking of the PLR-16 fiasco in Sumner County years ago.

    If you put a stock on instead of a brace and pay the tax; this is no longer an issue for you. Unless of course you believe they will start confiscating NFA items.

    I sold my AR Pistol because I found that an AR without a stock is worthless. And I wasn’t about to pay the NFA tax. A 16” AR with a collapsible stock filled the bill for my application and I had a far more usable weapon. But whatever works for you.

    • Like 1
  10. 6 hours ago, hipower said:

    Looking for comments on both sides of this please.

    Ok, we have a temporary reprieve. Do we take steps to plan for the return? Keep on buying braces and adding them on? 

    What you do is up to you. Just make sure you are aware that ATF “letters” on the brace (or anything else) do not protect you. That’s not something we probably have to worry about in Tennessee, but you never know.  

    As far as the issue of putting the AR in the NFA; I don’t think they will have the votes to do that. But I don’t pretend to know anymore what they will do.  If they did, it would go to the SCOTUS. So far, the SCOTUS has refused to hear the cases on states banning the AR. The Feds trying to do it will almost make them have to decide.

    I expect Biden to ban high capacity magazines by EO soon after taking office. He may try to ban the AR by EO. I don’t think he really cares if the court kills his EO’s; he just wants to be able to say he tried.

    Anyone that hasn’t stocked up on magazines should probably do that if they are available.

    • Like 1
  11. https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/breaking-atf-withdraws-comment-request-on-pistol-brace-objective-factors-classification/

    The ATF has just posted a notice that they have withdrawn their guidance and request for public comment on “Objective Factors for Classifying Weapons with ‘Stabilizing Braces‘” in the Federal Register. Here is the full announcement from the ATF:

    ATF is announcing the withdrawal of a notice and request for comments entitled “Objective Factors for Classifying Weapons with ‘Stabilizing Braces’,” that was published on December 18, 2020.

    ATF Deputy Director Marvin Richardson has just issued the following statement:

    Upon further consultation with the Department of Justice and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, ATF is withdrawing, pending further Department of Justice review, the notice and request for comments entitled “Objective Factors for Classifying Weapons with ‘Stabilizing Braces’,” that was published on December 18, 2020. 85 FR 82516. As explained in the notice, the proposed guidance was not a regulation. The notice informed and invited comment from the industry and public on a proposed guidance prior to issuing a final guidance document. 

    The withdrawal of the guidance does not change any law, regulation, or other legally binding requirement.

    December 23, 2020
    Marvin G. Richardson
    Associate Deputy Director


    As of this evening, more than 48,000 comments had been entered in the Federal Register objecting to the arbitrary and subjective nature of the ATF’s proposed classification of pistols equipped with stabilizing braces.

    Yesterday, 90 members of Congress sent a letter to ATF Interim Director Regina Lombardo noting that the ATF’s proposed guidance was anything but objective and could put law-abiding Americans in potential legal jeopardy.

    But TTAG has learned that the final straw that persuaded the ATF to back down and withdraw the guidance was serious pressure applied by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. A call took place over the weekend involving a number of firearms industry companies and McConnell’s office.

    McConnell’s subsequent involvement in the matter, along with fast and furious (to coin a phrase) activism from the gun rights community in opposition to the ATF’s proposed move were what resulted in this evening’s win.

    More details may be revealed over time, but this is an unqualified victory. One that many in the gun rights community likely weren’t expecting given recent news surrounding the ATF’s appetite for more firearms-related regulation in advance of a Biden inauguration.

    This, however, is just one win in a larger battle to protect Americans’ Second Amendment rights. A battle that is never really won and will surely require more participation from gun owners in the weeks and months ahead. Stay tuned for more as it becomes available.

    • Like 1
  12. Of course it’s a problem for them when a country they are trying to overrun has armed citizens, or their own that they are trying to kill get armed. Part of the justification for using the Atom Bombs on Japan came from the high estimates on casualties we would incur trying to invade Japan due to armed citizens.

    I don’t think China or Russia either one is an immediate threat to us militarily right now. But China is certainly more of a threat to our economy. The incoming administration is refusing to address the claims made against Joe’s involvement with China. We deserve an explanation, and we aren’t getting it; so he’s compromised on the China issue in my eyes. Of course we will see what happens.

    I feel the same why about how China feels about our laws that I do about the gun laws of other states; I don’t give a rolling rip down a razor blade what they think; and in our country I care what the state of Tennessee does.

    As Hozzie stated; we get in everyone’s business about nuclear weapons. If I was running a country I would want and expect to have nuclear weapons to protect my country. I wouldn’t care what the U.S. or the U.N. thought about it.

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 1
  13. 11 hours ago, No_0ne said:

    No.  But then again, it seems that most of "the people" aren't overly concerned one way or another about gun rights.  There are certainly some who are rabid anti-gunners, another few who are fervent supporters of unrestricted gun ownership and the RTBA.  Most fall somewhere in between, and don't spend much time worrying about the subject.  TGO is something of an echo chamber for the pro-2A crowd, but the public as a whole just isn't "all in" in the way that most of us are ...

    I agree. I don’t know what he will get done with AR’s and Hi-cap mags, but that’s why he (or she) will get private sales done away with. Most Americans are okay with that, and a big percentage of them think that is the way it already is. My guess is it will pass, and it will do nothing to reduce violence with guns. However, I’m sure they will manipulate the numbers to show that it is helping. Four years from now when Harris is President and running for a second term; it will be a big democratic talking point about what they got done.

  14. 9 hours ago, Moped said:

    That vote was not against guns. That vote was against Trump. 

    So I’m to believe that “The People” hated Trump so much they are willing to give up their AR’s, give up their high capacity magazines and be okay with doing away with private sales without background checks to get rid of him? But those same people now want to “send a message” about their 2nd amendment rights? That doesn’t make sense.

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.