Zulu Cowboy

Sold...

Pending sale...

Weapon still available... Zulu

Bump...

Gun is still available...

I just sent you an Instant Message...check the envelope icon in the upper right hand portion of this page. Zulu

Bump...

I'm selling my firearm related TLD domain name, GunsUSA.org. I was originally going to develop this into a gun rights, firearm safety, 2nd Amendment supporting website. But I've got too many irons in the fire, to develop it properly. Asking $3000 obo. Transaction is listed on a Dan.com, for sale page. (It's owned by GoDaddy). Please respond here or PM me first, before bidding. It will allow me to qualify for a 5% commission, for providing my own leads, instead of their usual 9% rate. The transaction will utilize the Dan.com escrow service, to ensure integrity. www.gunsusa.org Thanks, Zulu Cowboy

Well, there's certainly a lot of interesting things happening in the world, and in America right now. Our nation faces some difficult days ahead. But if I had to prioritize things, I would have to say that the assault on our freedom of speech; as it's being exposed in the #TwitterFiles has to be the most dire. I don't know how closely you guys have been following this, but things are busting loose right now. They're finding evidence of direct government censorship, over topics like influence peddling by Hunter Biden, the truth about Covid, and the dangers of the mRNA vaccine. The Biden administration has been implicated in having hundreds, perhaps thousands of accounts shut down; and of having legitimate posts being removed, of healthcare professionals who were simply trying to warn people about the vaccine. Simply disagreeing with Biden's policies, was enough to get your social media account taken down. It's a huge deal, when hundreds of federal agents are taken off of criminal investigations, and tasked with being the thought police for the Biden crime family. It's a huge deal when ordinary Americans are deprived of their freedom of speech, simply because of their political affiliation. The MSM is calling it a nothing-burger. The truth is, these are actual federal crimes that were being committed by the Biden administration, and agents of our own government. The American people deserve answers. The Twitter Files is a good place to start... #Twitterfiles Part 1 - https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598822959866683394 #Twitterfiles Part 2 - https://twitter.com/bariweiss/status/1601007575633305600 #Twitterfiles Part 3 - https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1601352083617505281 #Twitterfiles Part 4 - https://twitter.com/ShellenbergerMD/status/1601720455005511680 #Twitterfiles Part 5 - https://twitter.com/bariweiss/status/1602364197194432515 #Twitterfiles Part 6 - https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1603857534737072128 #Twitterfiles Supplement - https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1604613292491538432 #Twitterfiles Part 7 - https://twitter.com/ShellenbergerMD/status/1604871630613753856 #Twitterfiles Part 8 - https://twitter.com/lhfang/status/1605292454261182464 #Twitterfiles - TWITTER AND "OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES" - https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1606701397109796866 #Twitterfiles - TWITTER FILES: HOW TWITTER RIGGED THE COVID DEBATE - https://twitter.com/davidzweig/status/1607378386338340867

Yes sir...

Gun is still available...

Selling my once fired Glock model 45 MOS, 9mm (Gen5). Less than 50 rounds through it. Comes with a Trijicon Type 2 RMR, 6.5 MOA adjustible LED, red dot sight. + extra OEM mags. A beautiful weapon, priced to sell...$1,050.00 - $1000.00 - $975.00 Includes your choice of either a Left Hand IWB JM4 Tactical holster, or a Right Hand Bladetech OWB holster. (ammo not included...) Comes with cases, for both the Glock and the Trijicon RMR. I'll need to see your TN drivers license or Handgun permit. Located in Pleasant View, TN, just off I-24... Zulu

I read through the Trading Post policies, and the only reference to my question was... "TGO is a disinterested third-party which merely facilitates meetings between members who wish to legally buy, trade and sell firearms and gear." Is it okay to sell other personally owned items (besides firearms) as well? I've got a couple of high-end knives, and some body armor that I'd like to sell, if that's okay? If not...that's fine too...but I wanted to ask, first. Thanks... Zulu Cowboy

Here's the message I sent to my Representatives... I implore you sir...please protect my 2nd Amendment rights! NO MORE GUN LAWS. My right to own a semi-automatic rifle and (standard) high capacity magazines is very important to me. This one issue will determine whether or not you will continue to receive my support. Please don't blow this critical vote? Have the guts to honor your oath of office man! Respectfully yours...***** *****, Nashville TN. Zulu Cowboy

My friends... The United States Senate will decide today, whether or not your 2nd Amendment rights will continue to exist, in any meaningful way. If you care about this...I suggest that you email and/or phone both of your U.S. Senators TODAY...RIGHT NOW! And let them know how you feel about that. This is it folks...the time to stand up and be counted has arrived. Contact them this morning, before they vote! I tell you this...what is at stake here, is nothing less than your children and grandchildren's right to keep and bear arms. Below is the link for contacting your US Senators. It contains phone numbers and links to the pages where you can email your representatives directly. This is your last chance to stand up for liberty! Let your voice be heard. And please feel free to send this message on to everyone you can think of, who feels the same way. Obama can go straight to hell...my right to keep and bear arms is NOT UP FOR NEGOTIATION...EVER!!! God Bless... ~ Zulu Cowboy Contact your Representatives here: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm - - - - - - - - - http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/apr/16/short-60-senators-hunt-votes-background-checks/ Short of 60, senators hunt for votes on background checks By David Sherfinski - The Washington Times - Tuesday, April 16, 2013 Gun control supporters scrambled Tuesday to find 60 votes to pass expanded background checks on firearms purchases, hoping to sway reluctant senators ahead of a showdown vote. After spinning its wheels for most of the day Tuesday, the Senate set up a series of gun votes for Wednesday, including what has become the critical fight — a proposal to expand background checks to include all sales at gun shows and over the Internet, though it would exclude person-to-person private sales. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, has scheduled votes on eight other amendments to underlying gun legislation, including bans on certain types of guns and magazines. He told reporters earlier Tuesday that gun control supporters were still searching for support, but he felt they had momentum. "Am I saying it's all over with, done, we got the votes? No, but we certainly feel we have the wind at our back," he said. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, Connecticut Democrat, said the votes offer an opportunity to "keep faith" with the families of the 20 children and six adults killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., and the 3,400 victims of gun violence since the tragedy. "Just as the world has watched Newtown since Dec. 14, Newtown will be watching the U.S. Senate [Wednesday]," he said. "It will mark a critical milestone in the movement to fight gun violence." But the delay in voting seemed to signal momentum was on the other side — a sense buttressed by the dwindling number of undecided lawmakers and the growing number of those who say they cannot vote for the background check proposal. "The majority doesn't have the votes to pass their own amendment, so we're not voting," said Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee. "If we turn to assault weapons or magazines, then it's clear to all that the majority knows the votes aren't going to be there." The Senate last week agreed to bring the gun bill to the chamber floor, with many Republicans supportive of that move. Since then, however, the bill has stalled and lawmakers have not voted on any amendments. Earlier in the day, Democrats got a boost from the presence of former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, Arizona Democrat, who was gravely wounded when a gunman opened fire at an outdoor town hall she was holding in Tucson in 2011. Democrats also heard an emotional plea for action from Sen. Joe Manchin III of West Virginia, a co-sponsor of the background check compromise, as well as Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Christopher Murphy of Connecticut and Tim Kaine of Virginia, who was governor of the state at the time of the Virginia Tech shootings in 2007. The underlying bill has language on background checks that the compromise is supposed to replace. Other amendments up for a vote Wednesday would ban so-called assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. Mr. Grassley, Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas and other co-sponsors plan to unveil their substitute amendment Wednesday morning that makes changes to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, provides resources to help address mental health and school safety, protects veterans from false health determinations, and addresses gun trafficking and straw purchasing. The wide array of amendments could be a double-edged sword for Democrats. Voting against provisions to ban military-style, semi-automatic rifles and high-capacity ammunition magazines — measures widely presumed to fail — could give wary senators a chance to shore up their pro-gun bona fides and still vote for expanded background checks. But Republican amendments also could attract on-the-fence senators who represent gun-friendly states and make the background check amendment — already facing problems attracting the 60 votes necessary to avert any filibuster — that much more difficult to pass. The background check amendment carves out exemptions for private transactions between family members and friends. Presently, only federally licensed dealers are legally required to perform the checks. A total of 68 senators voted to bring the bill to the Senate floor for debate, including 16 Republicans. But of those GOP members, just four have indicated they could support the Manchin-Toomey background check proposal, while 11 have said they will oppose it. Sen. Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire has not signaled publicly whether she will vote for it. Several Democrats also could vote against the background check compromise, which — combined with the GOP objections — would leave the measure shy of the 60 votes needed. - - - - In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material in this post is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes…      

My friends... The United States Senate will decide today, whether or not your 2nd Amendment rights will continue to exist, in any meaningful way. If you care about this...I suggest that you email and/or phone both of your U.S. Senators TODAY...RIGHT NOW! And let them know how you feel about that. This is it folks...the time to stand up and be counted has arrived. Contact them this morning, before they vote! I tell you this...what is at stake here, is nothing less than your children and grandchildren's right to keep and bear arms. Below is the link for contacting your US Senators. It contains phone numbers and links to the pages where you can email your representatives directly. This is your last chance to stand up for liberty! Let your voice be heard. And please feel free to send this message on to everyone you can think of, who feels the same way. Obama can go straight to hell...my right to keep and bear arms is NOT UP FOR NEGOTIATION...EVER!!! God Bless... ~ Zulu Cowboy Contact your Representatives here: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm - - - - - - - - - http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/apr/16/short-60-senators-hunt-votes-background-checks/ Short of 60, senators hunt for votes on background checks By David Sherfinski - The Washington Times - Tuesday, April 16, 2013 Gun control supporters scrambled Tuesday to find 60 votes to pass expanded background checks on firearms purchases, hoping to sway reluctant senators ahead of a showdown vote. After spinning its wheels for most of the day Tuesday, the Senate set up a series of gun votes for Wednesday, including what has become the critical fight — a proposal to expand background checks to include all sales at gun shows and over the Internet, though it would exclude person-to-person private sales. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, has scheduled votes on eight other amendments to underlying gun legislation, including bans on certain types of guns and magazines. He told reporters earlier Tuesday that gun control supporters were still searching for support, but he felt they had momentum. "Am I saying it's all over with, done, we got the votes? No, but we certainly feel we have the wind at our back," he said. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, Connecticut Democrat, said the votes offer an opportunity to "keep faith" with the families of the 20 children and six adults killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., and the 3,400 victims of gun violence since the tragedy. "Just as the world has watched Newtown since Dec. 14, Newtown will be watching the U.S. Senate [Wednesday]," he said. "It will mark a critical milestone in the movement to fight gun violence." But the delay in voting seemed to signal momentum was on the other side — a sense buttressed by the dwindling number of undecided lawmakers and the growing number of those who say they cannot vote for the background check proposal. "The majority doesn't have the votes to pass their own amendment, so we're not voting," said Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee. "If we turn to assault weapons or magazines, then it's clear to all that the majority knows the votes aren't going to be there." The Senate last week agreed to bring the gun bill to the chamber floor, with many Republicans supportive of that move. Since then, however, the bill has stalled and lawmakers have not voted on any amendments. Earlier in the day, Democrats got a boost from the presence of former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, Arizona Democrat, who was gravely wounded when a gunman opened fire at an outdoor town hall she was holding in Tucson in 2011. Democrats also heard an emotional plea for action from Sen. Joe Manchin III of West Virginia, a co-sponsor of the background check compromise, as well as Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Christopher Murphy of Connecticut and Tim Kaine of Virginia, who was governor of the state at the time of the Virginia Tech shootings in 2007. The underlying bill has language on background checks that the compromise is supposed to replace. Other amendments up for a vote Wednesday would ban so-called assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. Mr. Grassley, Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas and other co-sponsors plan to unveil their substitute amendment Wednesday morning that makes changes to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, provides resources to help address mental health and school safety, protects veterans from false health determinations, and addresses gun trafficking and straw purchasing. The wide array of amendments could be a double-edged sword for Democrats. Voting against provisions to ban military-style, semi-automatic rifles and high-capacity ammunition magazines — measures widely presumed to fail — could give wary senators a chance to shore up their pro-gun bona fides and still vote for expanded background checks. But Republican amendments also could attract on-the-fence senators who represent gun-friendly states and make the background check amendment — already facing problems attracting the 60 votes necessary to avert any filibuster — that much more difficult to pass. The background check amendment carves out exemptions for private transactions between family members and friends. Presently, only federally licensed dealers are legally required to perform the checks. A total of 68 senators voted to bring the bill to the Senate floor for debate, including 16 Republicans. But of those GOP members, just four have indicated they could support the Manchin-Toomey background check proposal, while 11 have said they will oppose it. Sen. Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire has not signaled publicly whether she will vote for it. Several Democrats also could vote against the background check compromise, which — combined with the GOP objections — would leave the measure shy of the 60 votes needed. - - - - In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material in this post is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes…    

Radar at 4:17pm

Not that I know of...but here is a link to some live police/fire/ems freq's here in middle TN. I'm sure they'll be buzzing... http://www.radioreference.com/apps/audio/?mid=65 Zulu Cowboy

I guess I'll be listening to the storm spotters on 146.670 Mhz this afternoon... Zulu Cowboy - - - - - - - - - High potential for tornadoes, severe outbreak possible today http://www.wsmv.com/...friday-forecast NASHVILLE, TN (WSMV) - Middle Tennessee is under a high threat for tornadoes today, creating a potentially dangerous weather situation, according to the 4WARN weather team. Strong storms quickly moved through Davidson County around 6 a.m., creating dime-sized hail, but no weather alerts were issued in the Metro area. More rain and scattered storms are possible this morning, but with only an isolated severe threat of strong winds and large hail. Afternoon and evening storms will develop and pack a high risk for tornadoes, along with a very high risk for wind, hail and localized flooding. "There's a high potential for a couple of tornadoes to not only touchdown but stay on the ground once they touchdown in Middle Tennessee," said 4WARN Meteorologist Paul Heggen. The strongest storms are expected to develop in western Middle Tennessee after noon Friday, reaching Nashville between 2 p.m. and 6 p.m., then the Cumberland Plateau around 4 p.m. to 10 p.m. - - - - - - - - - In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material in this post is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes…

Well the State of Tennessee is now asking for it's pound of flesh... They've revoked his handgun carry permit. Here's the latest video... Zulu Cowboy

Sorry...I couldn't resist. Zulu Cowboy

Taken from Form 4473, the paperwork you must fill out to buy a firearm from a Federal Firearm Licensed dealer. http://www.atf.gov/forms/download/atf-f-4473-1.pdf Question (11-F) Have you ever been adjudicated mentally defective (which includes a determination by a court, board, commission, or other lawful authority that you are a danger to yourself or to others or are incompetent to manage your own affairs) OR have you ever been committed to a mental institution? Definitions...Question (11-F) Adjudicated Mentally Defective: A determination by a court, board, commission, or other lawful authority that a person, as a result of marked subnormal intelligence, or mental illness, incompetency, condition, or disease: (1) is a danger to himself or to others: or (2) lacks the mental capacity to contract or manage his own affairs. This term shall include: (1) a finding of insanity by a court in a criminal case; and (2) Those persons found incompetent to stand trial or found not guilty by reason of lack of mental responsibility. Committed to a Mental Institution: A formal commitment of a person to a mental institution by a court. board, commission. or other lawful authority. The term includes a commitment to a mental institution involuntarily. The term includes commitment for mental defectiveness or mental illness. It also includes commitments for other reasons, such as for drug use. The term does not include a person in a mental institution for observation or a voluntary admission to a mental institution. - - - - - - - - - Update...It appears that the NRA attorney has now changed his mind, and has backed out on taking his case... If you still want to donate a few bucks to David's legal defense fund, here is the new - LINK Zulu Cowboy

David now has an NRA attorney, and has decided to fight this. Here's the video... Zulu Cowboy

Someone has started a petition to the TN governor on dsarti's behalf. Bill Haslam, Governer of TN: Expunge The States Declaration That David Sarti Is Mentally Defective Here's the - LINK - If you want to sign it... Zulu Cowboy

It seems that while he was at a doctor's appointment, he made the mistake of mentioning the word suicide in a joking manner. The doctor decided to take it upon himself to commit him for a psychiatric evaluation, after which they confiscated his weapons. At least, that's what I got from watching the video. It seems to me that by doing this, they have taken from him the only things that made him happy. His love of the shooting sports, prepping, and his youtube channel. If he wasn't depressed before, It's a sure bet that he is now... Zulu Cowboy