bayouvol

Thanks guys, I just have a 44 special revolver and was trying to buy a carbine that would shoot both.

I am looking at an old Winchester rifle in 44 mag to buy. The only thing is that it will not load 44 specials. I thought it should feed both. Am I wrong?

Does anyone one know if they are making an extended threaded barrel for the compact yet? Are there any other mods that you would recommend?

I am not exactly set on the small mags but I do need a flat plate for the small mag I have. Then I wouldn't have any problem choosing a larger mag for my spare.

I don't know where to put this, but here goes. I recently bought a sr9c and it only came with one mag. I was wondering if anyone here (especially around knoxville) had extra mags they might sell at a decent price. 17 round or 10 doesn't matter.

I know they are not the same caliber but of the gun manufacturers which would you choose? Same price. Carry concealed and home defense both. I also have the chance for a conversion barrel for the glock to nine.

How good were the old Dan Wesson revolvers? How close were the internals to smith and wesson? Just curious if they are worth it at 350? 4 inch barrel with no others. Just gun.

How good is the quality on these pistols?

It does but I wa hoping to leave it original. Anything else?

I am looking at an argentine made hipower but the trigger sucks! Hard and heavy. Can these be lightened up and are they an ok gun? Do they hold up good? After all, I don't know how many rounds have been put through this one.

I believe the smith is a snub model 15. Blued

Forgot one to go above. Argentine hi power (350)

Choices are: smith wesson 6 shot 38 special snub with adjustable sights and the pin on the hammer (350), ruger sr9c stainless (3560), glock 27 (399), or sig p250 45acp compact (449), all the pistols have only one clip. Which would you buy and why?

Friend of mine says he killed deer at 60 yards with 124 grain hollowpoint from hipoint. Does that sound feasible? I really like the idea of one caliber through the house, but I know the sks is more powerful at a greater distance.

I meant that the smith mags would fit in keltec. I am used to the Keltec so I don't know if I could get used to having a safety to swipe off. I do like the browning pistol though.

Does the argentine use all the same parts as a regular hi Power? I have a keltec p11 so the mags would work for both the p11 and the 59.

Which would you choose? And why?

Home defense and possible closeup deer (30 yards)?.

Thanks for the help. I went to the lgs and he now has a Glock 21 at the same price. I don't know if I can conceal the 21 but it is a thought.

I have a choice between a Glock 36 and a ati 1911 style officers model. Which has more readily available parts and which will hold up in the long run? Will I do more maintenance on one? What is your opinion about safety or trigger safety?

In a shtf scenario, which would you rather have? Bear in mind weight to carry, having the same caliber for pistols and such. I am actually debating this in my mind.

I know the 357 is much more powerful but I am talking about shtf type problem. Bug out (or in). The 9 is a military round and from a five inch barrel could kill small deer. The 357 is more powerful and has a better range. Also can shoot 38. Would ammo availability be enough to overcome the other? Also with springs and mags to deal with the 357 is easier to maintain for any length of time and shooting. Which would you choose?

Thanks, that is whee I was heading. I have shot the keltec and it is decent out to 10 yards but not much beyond that for me. I haven't had a chance to shoot the llama.

Chance between keltec p11 or llama 45 double stack. The llama is a short barrel similar to the para p12. Which one would you choose and why? I have both calibers so ammo is not an issue.

So what range would you think is the extreme practice range? I want to become proficient at the outside realistic ranges.