Jump to content
ZoidMeister

Dan Wesson 1911 porn

Recommended Posts

This thread is dedicated to photos of your Dan Wesson 1911's gents (and ladies).  Post them up.

I'll start with . . . . .

The Twins - Dan Wesson Classic Bobtails - CBOB's - 10mm & .45 ACP

(yea, I'm a lousy photographer)

Twins%20DW%20Classic%20C-BOB%20-%20001.J

Twins%20DW%20Classic%20C-BOB%20-%20002.J

Twins%20DW%20Classic%20C-BOB%20-%20004.J

Twins%20DW%20Classic%20C-BOB%20-%20009.J

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is mine.
0dbe72e1aa06706e43763b958809bfdc.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, ARO Matt said:

Sadly I took no pics of my EDC Guardian .38 Super before it was stolen...loved that gun!

Arrrgh . . . . I hate that for you.

I would like the post, but nobody could like getting something that nice unknowingly "borrowed" . . . . .

Edited by ZoidMeister

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was planning on adding these before I read ARO's post above, but my two Dan Wesson 1911's are both Guardians . . . . .

Now I feel like an insensitive arse . . . . . kinda . . . . .

The Twins - Dan Wesson Guardian Bobtails - .38 Super & .45 ACP

Twins%20DW%20Guardian-005.JPG

 

Twins%20DW%20Guardian-002.JPG

 

Twins%20DW%20Guardian-004.JPG

 

Edited by ZoidMeister

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, ZoidMeister said:

I was planning on adding these before I read ARO's post above, but my two Dan Wesson 1911's are both Guardians . . . . .

Now I feel like an insensitive arse . . . . . kinda . . . . .

The Twins - Dan Wesson Guardian Bobtails - .38 Super & .45 ACP

Twins%20DW%20Guardian-005.JPG

 

Twins%20DW%20Guardian-002.JPG

 

Twins%20DW%20Guardian-004.JPG

 

 Yep, that's my .38 there...well, not mine, but a twin.  Second favorite handgun I've ever owned, and was a birthday gift from my wife to top it off.  My fault though.  I stopped at a "no carry" establishment and left it in the car.  Then forgot about it when I got home.  Someone decided to check my car for stuff that night and bingo, they had a winner.  Awesome gun though!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, ARO Matt said:

 Yep, that's my .38 there...well, not mine, but a twin.  Second favorite handgun I've ever owned, and was a birthday gift from my wife to top it off.  My fault though.  I stopped at a "no carry" establishment and left it in the car.  Then forgot about it when I got home.  Someone decided to check my car for stuff that night and bingo, they had a winner.  Awesome gun though!

D,JD. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not a 1911 guy but do have a Dan Wesson .44 Magnum that I love.  Are these mostly the CZ owned Dan Wessons or the pre Cz models (or is there a difference)?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, ma6907 said:

I am not a 1911 guy but do have a Dan Wesson .44 Magnum that I love.  Are these mostly the CZ owned Dan Wessons or the pre Cz models (or is there a difference)?

Of the four DW's I have, only one is pre-CZ - the Classic 10mm.  There are differences, but for me they are so close as to be negligible.  If I had to pick one (pre vs. post) I like the post-CZ acquisition guns I have a tiny bit more . . . but then, I don't have a lot of experience comparing pre models, vs. post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, tarheelbball said:

20151030_205353-1_zpsmsncxue1.jpg

Nice Guardian and Runt!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a pair I had Custom built by DW a few years ago.

Commander & Govt  length, forged frames bobtailed, both have Cylinder & Slide top quality internals, Greider Triggers, Dawson Sights.

These have proven to be great pistols.

42217 008.JPG

Edited by AuEagle
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since we are boasting here .......my Valor w CoCobolos ,the stock thin grips werent my style,I have to admit this 1911 impresses me every time I shoot it

0634866d-1848-40c4-81c2-38a8ebf6db9f_zps

Edited by SonnyCrockett
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a picture of my Valor, changed the grips to VZ full size did not like the thin ones. That's the only modification I have done, great gun.

Have a Guardian and a couple of CZ 75 also.

Valor.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By xtriggerman
      Well, after building the 1892 Winchester in 357, I guess I got horned into 357 and just had to finally spring for a nice wheel gun. My taste is in S&W but I want a nice handling range gun and the K frame is just right as not being too heavy. Besides I carried a M10 S&W as a duty gun for 18 years and became fond of my qualifying scores with that action. Problem is, I think S&W has been giving the shooting public the screws on their K frame magnums for a very long time. Frame cutting, and burned throats aside, That I can understand but I draw the line at poor barrel shank design. Iv seen a few K's with bore bulges just forward the barrel shank threads inside the frame mouth. Its ugly and should not happen. Reason being, they stop the barrel treads into a "root diameter" opening cut of the shank rather than stopping the threads into thread OD. Taurus correctly decided long ago that they would correct this deficiency and that is one main reason why I bought a 669 rather than a 66 S&W aside from the $$$ difference. The barrel cylinder gap on the Taurus is perfect at .004. It needs a trigger job and a forcing cone hone that I figured would be needed but all in all, this particular Taurus 357 is going to be a very sweet shooter. Its a bit beefier in the frame than a S&W 66 and the finish is exceptional for the 5 bones even OTD on a GB purchase.
       
      The Taurus shank



    • By robtattoo
      Well, kind of a review, bearing in mind I've only owned the thing for (checks calendar...) 5hrs & 5 minutes.
      First impressions: It's a mini Vaquero! Fit & finish is far better than I expected actually. Joint to joint finish is very tight, although there are a few rounded corners, making it look more 'gappy' than it really is. The grips are perfect fit for the frame & are significantly nicer than those on the Blackhawk or vaquero. Yes, they're plastic, but the checkering is crisp & sharp. It feels very familiar to my hand. Like my 1860 Army. It points just as well too. The sights line up instinctively as soon as it's brought to bear. The MIM hammer has a little patch of very grippy checkering (Like the Blackhawk) making strong or support hand, thumb cocking a breeze. The trigger is rough. It has a pretty long, gritty take up & as it comes heavy break weight. I'd estimate pull weight at around 7-8lb. For a single action, that's just horrible. That said, there is a super simple mod that can be done with no permanent alterations to all Ruger single actions. Pop off a grip plate & drop one leg of the trigger spring of it's post. Instantly reduces weight by 50%. I worked the hammer & trigger a couple hundred times before shooting it & the grittiness went away, although the pre travel remains. It's 1000 times better than it was though & The break itself is very clean with minimal over travel. I also gave all the twiddly expensive bits a drop of oil & greased up the hammer strut. This reduces the cocking effort significantly. The hammer strut rides through a thin steel plate at the bottom of the grip & THAT'S the part that Ruger decided needed minimal tolerance. They bind on occasion. The best solution is to open up the hole a wee bit, but that's not really a fair thing to do before a test/review. Let's be honest, 99.9% of folks won't do it, so I slapped on some lithium grease instead.
      To the shooty bit.....
      Testing parameters:
      I'm working on the theory here that since this is a really cheap pistol, 99% of buyers are going to use it purely for plinking & occasional target use, but certainly not competition (CAS/SASS stuff aside) bullseye shooting. This being my train of thought, I didn't bother even trying any quality ammunition. No Eley, no Lapua. Only cheap, readily available bulk.....crap to be fair.
      I shot indoors, at Templar Shooting Sports range here in Tullahoma ($20+tax per lane) so wind & atmospheric variables could be avoided. Ruger state in their blurb that the sight is regulated at 15yds, so that's the distance I shot at. Shooting was done from a rested, seated position from a Caldwell sand bag. 2 full cylinders (12 shot groups) were fired at each target & the groups measured at the end of testing. The target wasn't moved during grouping.
       
      Ammunition tested:
      Aguila Super Extra 40gn solid
      Federal Target Grade 40gn solid
      Remington Golden bullet 38gn HP
      Federal Black Pack 36gn HP
      *Winchester Super X 37gn HP
       
      I had no ammunition failures, nothing shot or sounded 'weak' (common with bulk) or 'hot'. Not one single mechanical issue with the pistol at all in 125 rounds fired. I fired 3 full cylinders of blind-loaded mixed bag ammo to ensure hitting paper at 15yds & to ensure the cylinder & barrel were good & dirty before I began the accuracy portion. 
       
      The targets:
      Aguila 40gn....
       
       

The Fine Print

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions. TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines