Jump to content

Legal Question


Murgatroy

Recommended Posts

If you can quote law, or are a lawyer, please answer. Anecdotal is fine, but will be taken with a grain of salt. If you prefer to PM me that is fine to. I just need a simple answer, not sympathy or sorrow.

 

A family member dies and legally there was no will, no power of attorney and four equal heirs. One heir is in prison, one heir is homeless and otherwise unknown. Two heirs are available. One of the two heirs feigned interest in settling the issue of the remains, however upon finding out that the 'estate' only exists as the remains, has refused to answer phone or text from the other heir, the hospital or the nursing home.

As such the last remaining heir is using the clause of 'paramount right' to have the remains cremated. This heir is covering the cost.

 

All heirs are estranged from one another and the decedent. Some for over twenty years.

 

That is the background.

 

The question regards the one heir that is using 'paramount right' to have the remains cremated. The research on that is done, but the question is about any debts or other contracts regarding the decedent. Does the heir have any legal responsibility to that? Again, there is no power of attorney, no will, nothing of the sort. It is my understanding that any property real or imagined was seized by the state many years ago. The decedent has been passed for nearly a week and this is only being settled as a way to prevent an 'unclaimed body,' and clearing a conscience. 

 

Thank you for your time.

Link to comment
23 minutes ago, Murgatroy said:

If you can quote law, or are a lawyer, please answer. Anecdotal is fine, but will be taken with a grain of salt. If you prefer to PM me that is fine to. I just need a simple answer, not sympathy or sorrow.

 

A family member dies and legally there was no will, no power of attorney and four equal heirs. One heir is in prison, one heir is homeless and otherwise unknown. Two heirs are available. One of the two heirs feigned interest in settling the issue of the remains, however upon finding out that the 'estate' only exists as the remains, has refused to answer phone or text from the other heir, the hospital or the nursing home.

As such the last remaining heir is using the clause of 'paramount right' to have the remains cremated. This heir is covering the cost.

 

All heirs are estranged from one another and the decedent. Some for over twenty years.

 

That is the background.

 

The question regards the one heir that is using 'paramount right' to have the remains cremated. The research on that is done, but the question is about any debts or other contracts regarding the decedent. Does the heir have any legal responsibility to that? Again, there is no power of attorney, no will, nothing of the sort. It is my understanding that any property real or imagined was seized by the state many years ago. The decedent has been passed for nearly a week and this is only being settled as a way to prevent an 'unclaimed body,' and clearing a conscience. 

 

Thank you for your time.

Most debtors, credit cards, loans etc, can't hold a third party responsible for any debt.  My MIL passed away and I took the responsibility of taking care of notifications to debtors. You will need a few copies of the certified death certificate, some will accept a faxed, scanned copy, others will insist on an original.  

Link to comment
  • Moderators

I wasn't aware of any such law as this until my mother passed away last year.  She didn't owe anyone as my brother and I always took care of her.  While she was in hospice this topic came up with some family and friends.  Like I said most of us in the room had never heard of this.  Come to find out there are 29 or 30 states that have varying laws for filial responsibility. TN being one as is NC where my mother lived.  Google "Filial Responsibility" to get all the reading you would like.  As always, an attorney is where one should get their factual answers.  Was dealing with our attorney for some legal preparation for my in-laws today.

http://www.calhounlawtn.com/tennessee-filial-responsibility-rules/

Link to comment
22 hours ago, Omega said:

Most debtors, credit cards, loans etc, can't hold a third party responsible for any debt.  My MIL passed away and I took the responsibility of taking care of notifications to debtors. You will need a few copies of the certified death certificate, some will accept a faxed, scanned copy, others will insist on an original.  

Death certificates are like gun safes. You never get enough the first time around.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
21 minutes ago, TNman207 said:

Here's my advice for what it's worth; the silliest thing you can do is take legal advice from anyone on a forum.

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
 

The worst advice you can get on this forum... "What's the best handgun?". It all gets better from there.

Link to comment
3 hours ago, TNman207 said:

Here's my advice for what it's worth; the silliest thing you can do is take legal advice from anyone on a forum.

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
 

Thankfully I have been around long enough to realize when advice is sound, and when it isn't. This site if full of a lot of knowledgeable cats, and some lawyers.

Link to comment
I wasn't aware of any such law as this until my mother passed away last year.  She didn't owe anyone as my brother and I always took care of her.  While she was in hospice this topic came up with some family and friends.  Like I said most of us in the room had never heard of this.  Come to find out there are 29 or 30 states that have varying laws for filial responsibility. TN being one as is NC where my mother lived.  Google "Filial Responsibility" to get all the reading you would like.  As always, an attorney is where one should get their factual answers.  Was dealing with our attorney for some legal preparation for my in-laws today.
http://www.calhounlawtn.com/tennessee-filial-responsibility-rules/



File under WtF?!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Just now, Hershmeister said:

 

 


File under WtF?!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

 

Yea, and if your folks go into a nursing home, the state can put a lean on their property.  And if they transfer (gift) said property, it had better be at least 5 years before they go into the nursing home or the state can still go after it.  Knew someone that was fighting the state because their parent had parcelled out some land to them and they built a house on it, and the state said they owned their land and house because the parent went into a nursing home before the 5 years was up.  I changed jobs so don't know the outcome but I thought it was BS for the state to even attempt that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
On 11/29/2017 at 1:07 AM, Omega said:

Yea, and if your folks go into a nursing home, the state can put a lean on their property.  And if they transfer (gift) said property, it had better be at least 5 years before they go into the nursing home or the state can still go after it.  Knew someone that was fighting the state because their parent had parcelled out some land to them and they built a house on it, and the state said they owned their land and house because the parent went into a nursing home before the 5 years was up.  I changed jobs so don't know the outcome but I thought it was BS for the state to even attempt that.

Seems like there should be a burden of proof on the state to show that the parents purposely became destitute before they can touch any property.

Link to comment
2 hours ago, macville said:

Seems like there should be a burden of proof on the state to show that the parents purposely became destitute before they can touch any property.

No, it seems all they need is to be under state care, then the state can recoup their expenditures.  There are a few loopholes, such as a disabled child in the house or a child living there with no means to go elsewhere.  The child can be an adult child of the home owner in state care btw.

Link to comment
On 11/30/2017 at 4:45 PM, Omega said:

No, it seems all they need is to be under state care, then the state can recoup their expenditures.  There are a few loopholes, such as a disabled child in the house or a child living there with no means to go elsewhere.  The child can be an adult child of the home owner in state care btw.

"Should be" is the key word. But the people who write laws are crazy on purpose.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.