Jump to content
Garufa

M&P M2.0 3.6" Compact

Recommended Posts

Smith & Wesson has announced a 3.6" barrel version of their wildly popular M2.0 Compact (4").  Available in both 9 and 40.

https://www.smith-wesson.com/firearms/mp-9-m20-36-compact

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Love my 9C version 1. Great match between a full-size and pocket carry (I can conceal it, but it handles like a full size for me). 

Primary reason I got the 9 was ammo capacity, 12 or 18 rds w/ extended mag. The .45 only carried 9 I think?

Got me to thinking, and I don't mean to start a debate, just showing my ignorance... if you were going to carry a .40-cal, why not a .45? I know it's a debated topic, but is there an inherent feature to the 40-cal cartridge that I'm missing? If I was interested in bigger-bang (aka 45 vs. 9), I'd be shopping for .45 or 10mm! I see a lot of police turn-ins in 40, so I always assumed there was a reason, just can't think of it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ReeferMac said:

Love my 9C version 1. Great match between a full-size and pocket carry (I can conceal it, but it handles like a full size for me). 

Primary reason I got the 9 was ammo capacity, 12 or 18 rds w/ extended mag. The .45 only carried 9 I think?

Got me to thinking, and I don't mean to start a debate, just showing my ignorance... if you were going to carry a .40-cal, why not a .45? I know it's a debated topic, but is there an inherent feature to the 40-cal cartridge that I'm missing? If I was interested in bigger-bang (aka 45 vs. 9), I'd be shopping for .45 or 10mm! I see a lot of police turn-ins in 40, so I always assumed there was a reason, just can't think of it?

Capacity. My full size .40 has 15 rounds. I don’t need to carry an extra mag.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, ReeferMac said:

 

Got me to thinking, and I don't mean to start a debate, just showing my ignorance... if you were going to carry a .40-cal, why not a .45? I know it's a debated topic, but is there an inherent feature to the 40-cal cartridge that I'm missing? If I was interested in bigger-bang (aka 45 vs. 9), I'd be shopping for .45 or 10mm! I see a lot of police turn-ins in 40, so I always assumed there was a reason, just can't think of it?

I like all 3 cartridges. They  all function well and , with the proper Ammo choice , are great defensive weapons. 

I like the .40 caliber most of the 3 for several reasons: 1) capacity in the same sized weapon doesn’t drop off much from the 9mm but will dramatically transitioning to .45 2) anecdotally I find the recoil of the .40 to be nearly identical to 9mm but far less than .45 even though some disagree 3) generally speaking , there is more stopping power in a wide variety of .40 cal loads than 9mm and it’s nearly identical to the .45.

That being said , my current edc is a 9mm shield , but that has more to do with a great deal on the weapon than anything. I’ll still feel as safe with it as I have traditionally felt with my G27 but more comfortable, physically. 

On a side note , many reloaders hate this load because the brass gets “glocked” in the unsupported chamber of the factory barrel and is rendered unsafe to reload . This problem is easily solved with a fully supported aftermarket barrel which will also greatly increase accuracy and won’t sacrifice reliability (I’ve happily been using a storm lake barrel for years ).

Edited by tntnixon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, tntnixon said:

 

...On a side note , many reloaders hate this load because the brass gets “glocked” in the unsupported chamber of the factory barrel and is rendered unsafe to reload . 

Picked up and loaded hundreds if not thousand of the brass out of glocks.  Never had an issue.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, chances R said:

Picked up and loaded hundreds if not thousand of the brass out of glocks.  Never had an issue.

I know many who have . Just mentioning that’s one of the things people say negatively about the .40 round .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, ReeferMac said:

Got me to thinking, and I don't mean to start a debate, just showing my ignorance... if you were going to carry a .40-cal, why not a .45? I know it's a debated topic, but is there an inherent feature to the 40-cal cartridge that I'm missing? If I was interested in bigger-bang (aka 45 vs. 9), I'd be shopping for .45 or 10mm! I see a lot of police turn-ins in 40, so I always assumed there was a reason, just can't think of it?

I was a fairly early adopter of the 40 back in the day. it offered befter stopping performance in a 9mm size package back then. 9mm terminal performance was thought to be marginal. In the last 15 years or so bullet design has solved those issues and today I think the 40 offers little advantage over a 9mm. Most people shoot a 9mm better than a 40 or 45. 

For years I was a 45 guy, 40 offered more capacity with only a slight terminal performance loss. Today I use 9mm almost exclusively. 

If you can handle full house 10mm loads, it's top of the heap... Great muzzle flash at night! 45 ammo is cheaper...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The .40 gained a lot of popularity during the 1994-2004 Assault Weapons Ban.  The thought was, if I can only carry a gun with a 10 round mag, may as well carry the bigger rounds.   LEO agencies were also going to .40 in large numbers at the time.

 

Now the trend has swung the other way, with the development of more effective 9mm JHP ammo.   .40s are sitting on the shelves in droves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven’t got a 2.0 Compact yet, but I will. For me, concealment is more dependent on width than length. Accuracy is absolutely dependent on length. There is only 1.3 Oz difference is the 3.6 and 4 inch models. I think I’ll probably go with the 4” since I see no advantage to the 3.6”. But I guess I’ll need to see them both.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see no reason for the 3.6 the 4 inch conceals perfectly and is perfect in my opinion 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah it's hard to imagine what they were thinking. "We are getting a flood of complaints about the 4.0 version; everyone says they wish it were .4" shorter."

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/16/2018 at 9:08 AM, ken_mays said:

Yeah it's hard to imagine what they were thinking. "We are getting a flood of complaints about the 4.0 version; everyone says they wish it were .4" shorter."

Who is that quote from?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/16/2018 at 10:08 AM, ken_mays said:

Yeah it's hard to imagine what they were thinking. "We are getting a flood of complaints about the 4.0 version; everyone says they wish it were .4" shorter."

Releasing the 3.6 should drive down the price of the 4.0. Good. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the 2.0 9 C with the 4" brl. Like it a lot. 15+1 fully loaded. Fits my medium sized hands.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/22/2018 at 12:33 PM, DaveTN said:

Who is that quote from?

My imaginary S&W product managers :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Steelharp
      . Hey, this guy at work brings me a bag with a completely disassembled Colt .38. The last patent date on the barrel is 1888, and the serial # is 67. Says COLT D.A. 38. Any idea when it was made?
    • By Grayfox54
      Lately I've been noticing a lot of AR pistols for sale around here. I'm beginning to like the idea. I really like the looks of one. Especially when decked out with Magpul furniture and a blade stock. I'm sorta gettin' an itch here and I'd like to know what the group here thinks about them.
       Many years ago when I was a young troop in Uncle Sam's Green Machine, my issue weapon for a while was a M3 Grease Gun. I really liked it. So the idea of a sub-gun sized weapon has a certain appeal to me. 
      However, I think I'd prefer one in a pistol caliber. Either 9mm or .45acp. Being a 1911 type guy and with my previous experience with the M3, I'm leaning toward something in .45acp. I'm also a reloader, so ammo cost isn't really a decisive factor here. I've also heard that firing the 5.56 out of such a short barrel has a really nasty muzzle flash and is extremely loud. So another reason to go with a pistol caliber. However, there are several listed locally in 5.56 at what seem to be reasonable prices. So maybe I shouldn't rule them out? 
      Also, it doesn't necessarily have to be a AR platform. Just something in that basic size and pistol type configuration. So I am open to suggestions. 
      I've done a bit of checking around the web. PSA is currently out of everything in pistol calibers. Other guns often sell for $1000+. I don't want to spend that kind of money on what will pretty much be a range toy. So I'm open to suggestions. 
      So tell me, what are your experiences with the AR type pistols? The good, bad and ugly? Caliber choices? Accuracy at say 100 yards? Worth it or a waste of money?
      BTW: there's a gun show here next weekend. I'd like to know what to look for or even if I should bother looking. 
       
    • By SonnyCrockett
      1 of 5000,M17s released to the public,...Pretty neat gun..

Footer title

This content can be configured within your theme settings in your ACP. You can add any HTML including images, paragraphs and lists.

Footer title

This is an example of a list.

Footer title

This content can be configured within your theme settings in your ACP. You can add any HTML including images, paragraphs and lists.

Footer title

This content can be configured within your theme settings in your ACP. You can add any HTML including images, paragraphs and lists.

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines