Jump to content

Noah's Ark in Kentucky


Recommended Posts

  • Admin Team
2 hours ago, Trekbike said:

Just curious, your comment led me to think you don't subscribe to the "Young Earth" theory, correct?    

 

I don’t. 

I am in practice what most would consider a conservative Christian. But, I also work to sync my faith with what’s been revealed to us through science - or art for that matter.  

My faith is not challenged if the narrative of Genesis has more to say about the relationship between God and his created people rather than it does specifically, literally about “how” the earth was created.  

I do very much believe in a creator God. 

My kids were taught the creation story on the flannel graph just like I was.  But, as a church - we don’t want our kids to grow up feeling like they need to turn part of their brain off when they go to church - so we try to struggle with these things in a way that’s open and genuine.

As scientists, the more we learn, the more we find we don’t know. I’m certain future peoples will look at us with the same wonder that we look at the understanding of other ancient cultures.

I think our modern, post-enlightenment minds make a mistake when we try to take the Bible and turn it into a scientific text. That’s not how the intended audience would have read it - and so we should be careful there, too.

I do believe it has an enormous amount to tell us about our relationship as a community with a creator God. In that way, the stories in the first part of Genesis represent a far different story than the creation narratives of other near-Eastern cultures of the time.

For that matter, and back to this topic, I’m even okay if the flood narrative is mostly apocryphal.  It doesn’t disrupt my faith.

But, at the same time, I can go to see a full-scale model in Kentucky and think it’s pretty cool.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment

I've resigned to the theory that the folks in biblical times had a different concept of time, or at least a different way of measuring it than what we have today.

 

I still can't wrap my head around folks living for several hundred years then, yet I've watched the average life expectancy go up my entire life.

I'm pretty simple minded.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
8 minutes ago, gregintenn said:

I've resigned to the theory that the folks in biblical times had a different concept of time, or at least a different way of measuring it than what we have today.

 

I still can't wrap my head around folks living for several hundred years then, yet I've watched the average life expectancy go up my entire life.

I'm pretty simple minded.

If we kept producing HGH like we did in our 20's we'd live a lot longer than we do.

Link to comment
  • Moderators
On 4/14/2019 at 7:50 PM, MacGyver said:

They’re young earthers, but if you can get past that, it’s pretty cool and worth seeing.  

My kids went there last summer and really enjoyed it. 

Young earth is so 1990's. It's flat earth or get out.

  • Haha 4
Link to comment

I'm a Christian and an engineer. I believe what's in Genesis even if it doesn't quite seem to jive with current scientific theory of world history.   I have a few simple ideas as to how to resolve that, but I'm quite sure I won't get the final answer here on earth.

I also understand that what we actually know about geologic history is like a drop of water in the ocean.  It's fairly routine for new discoveries to flip existing geologic history theory on its head. This is one of the first questions I intend to ask. I expect the explanation may take a while, but I figure I'll have the time.  :)  

Edited by peejman
  • Like 4
Link to comment

I am hardly a biblical scholar, but I don’t quite grasp the concept of selective belief in the Bible. The Bible speaks against adding or taking away from the text. From my (perhaps simplistic) perspective either you believe in the Bible or you don’t. If you selectively believe in certain portions you believe in something other than the Bible. Of course each one of us has that choice to make and I am fine with it (wouldn’t matter if I wasn’t) as we’ll all be held accountable for our beliefs. Of course I recognize many may differ in their opinion as to the consequences of those beliefs. 

In any event, I agree with greggintenn in that the Biblical era may well have had a different concept of time. I also wonder about the veracity of carbon dating. Circling back to the Bible (for you believers), how old was Adam at the time of his creation? Clearly not an infant. I see no reason why the earth could not have been created at a mature age or some age other than that of “an infant.”  As peejman said, we’ll have the time to figure it out...

For all you gamblers and non-believers out there look up Pascal’s wager. 

Edited by Bnashville
  • Like 1
Link to comment
9 minutes ago, Bnashville said:

I am hardly a biblical scholar, but I don’t quite grasp the concept of selective belief in the Bible. The Bible speaks against adding or taking away from the text. From my (perhaps simplistic) perspective either you believe in the Bible or you don’t. If you selectively believe in certain portions you believe in something other than the Bible. Of course each one of us has that choice to make and I am fine with it (wouldn’t matter if I wasn’t) as we’ll all be held accountable for our beliefs. Of course I recognize many may differ in their opinion as to the consequences of those beliefs. 

In any event, I agree with greggintenn in that the Biblical era may well have had a different concept of time. I also wonder about the veracity of carbon dating. Circling back to the Bible (for you believers), how old was Adam at the time of his creation? Clearly not an infant. I see no reason why the earth could not have been created at a mature age or some age other than that of “an infant.”  As peejman said, we’ll have the time to figure it out...

For all you gamblers and non-believers out there look up Pascal’s wager. 

This goes to the idea of God creating the earth in a manner that we can interpret on our own. If we don't take his word for it then we are responsible for our incorrect interpretation.

1 Corinthians 1:27 - But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty

Link to comment
38 minutes ago, Bnashville said:

I am hardly a biblical scholar, but I don’t quite grasp the concept of selective belief in the Bible. The Bible speaks against adding or taking away from the text. From my (perhaps simplistic) perspective either you believe in the Bible or you don’t. If you selectively believe in certain portions you believe in something other than the Bible. Of course each one of us has that choice to make and I am fine with it (wouldn’t matter if I wasn’t) as we’ll all be held accountable for our beliefs. Of course I recognize many may differ in their opinion as to the consequences of those beliefs. 

In any event, I agree with greggintenn in that the Biblical era may well have had a different concept of time. I also wonder about the veracity of carbon dating. Circling back to the Bible (for you believers), how old was Adam at the time of his creation? Clearly not an infant. I see no reason why the earth could not have been created at a mature age or some age other than that of “an infant.”  As peejman said, we’ll have the time to figure it out...

For all you gamblers and non-believers out there look up Pascal’s wager. 

Your thinking is way deeper than mine. I'm still trying to figure out whether Adam had a belly button.:lol:

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
  • Admin Team
3 hours ago, Bnashville said:

I am hardly a biblical scholar, but I don’t quite grasp the concept of selective belief in the Bible. The Bible speaks against adding or taking away from the text. From my (perhaps simplistic) perspective either you believe in the Bible or you don’t. If you selectively believe in certain portions you believe in something other than the Bible. Of course each one of us has that choice to make and I am fine with it (wouldn’t matter if I wasn’t) as we’ll all be held accountable for our beliefs. Of course I recognize many may differ in their opinion as to the consequences of those beliefs. 

In any event, I agree with greggintenn in that the Biblical era may well have had a different concept of time. I also wonder about the veracity of carbon dating. Circling back to the Bible (for you believers), how old was Adam at the time of his creation? Clearly not an infant. I see no reason why the earth could not have been created at a mature age or some age other than that of “an infant.”  As peejman said, we’ll have the time to figure it out...

For all you gamblers and non-believers out there look up Pascal’s wager. 

I very much believe the whole thing. I am just willing to look at it as the story of God's people - and not necessarily have to have it be a scientific text.

I might even go further to say that I'm willing to believe in divine revelation even when human authors, translators, preachers, and readers are imperfect.

For example - take the King James Bible that is generally revered by the most conservative traditions.  Those traditions that still regularly use it do so because they believe that it is the "purest" English translation. Modern vernacular arguments aside - did you know that the original 1611 version of the King James included several books of the Apocrypha? In fact every version up until 1666 did - and they were included in most versions up through 1885. They were already debated at the time.  Jerome labels them as such in the 4th century - even though they were in the Jewish Septuagint. Really he keeps them because St. Augustin talks him into it.  Post-reformation, they're really removed (despite a big war being fought) because the protestants would really like to appear less Catholic. There's a lot more here - and it's an interesting bit of history I recommend - but there are some pieces not in most Bibles today because one tradition wanted to look less like another tradition.

What do we do with that?

All of our translations are problematic.  The best translators are upfront about the decisions they make and why they've made them.  But, they're admitting that their translation of the text is imperfect because of the lack of ability to express ancient languages across into something accessible by the reader.

Does God still speak to us through imperfect translations?

What about through imperfect understandings of ideas?

I read an article the other day that made a compelling case for needing a second person plural in our translations - basically the Bible needs "y'all" and "all y'all" because we don't have the words in English do describe a Greek plural "you."  As such, we mistake "you" in some cases to speak to us individually when we should be reading it  "y'all" to speak to us as a community.

I guess I say all of this to say that I can continue to believe without a full understanding - and even an imperfect one.

I pray that God will be graceful with all of us...

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
  • Admin Team
2 hours ago, SWJewellTN said:

This goes to the idea of God creating the earth in a manner that we can interpret on our own. If we don't take his word for it then we are responsible for our incorrect interpretation.

1 Corinthians 1:27 - But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty

Something I've pondered a lot over the last few years is what if one day we get the chance to ask God all of those big questions, and the response we get it, "oh, you just weren't created to understand that."

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.