Jump to content
Pickaroon

What .38 ammo for .....

Recommended Posts

.....carry in a S&W Airweight snubnose? Can't be +P. Thanks for any recommendations.

Edited by Pickaroon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not +p, it should handle it fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I couldn't or didn't want to use +p loads, I would go with a lightweight jhp. Something like 110 gr. or maybe lighter. Loads like that might have enough velocity to expand. Some guys go the other way and use 158 gr. cast or similar with a large meplat. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Raoul said:

Why not +p, it should handle it fine.

I thought +P was not recommended for Airweights.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Pickaroon said:

I thought +P was not recommended for Airweights.

What model “airweight” and when was it made?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Pickaroon said:

I thought +P was not recommended for Airweights.

If you can look at the barrel, it'll have a "+p" near the 38 spl if it's capable of that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally loved Federal 125 gr Nyclad HPs, and still carry them in my S&W 442 along with 2 additional speed strips full. I thought this was the best standard pressure defense round going for snubbies. Sadly, Federal dropped them. I snap them up, whenever I can find the odd box, here or there. 
 

Now, I’d probably go with the HST round mentioned above or the Speer Gold Dot. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Pickaroon said:

I thought +P was not recommended for Airweights.

Look at the S & W website.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Garufa said:

What model “airweight” and when was it made?

It's a 638-3. And sure enough it does say +P on the barrel! Thanks.

Edited by Pickaroon
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For snubbies, I'm a fan of the old 158 gr LSWCHP load aka the "FBI load".  It can be found in both standard and +P velocities. Nothing fancy, it just plain works. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Grayfox54 said:

For snubbies, I'm a fan of the old 158 gr LSWCHP load aka the "FBI load".  It can be found in both standard and +P velocities. Nothing fancy, it just plain works. 

I agree and I carry non +P, Winchester Super X .38 special semi wadcutters in my .38 special revolvers.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My personal choice in my Chiefs Special is two .360 dia round balls over a fast burning powder. Ten holes in five shots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, DaveTN said:

Now that we know what the gun is and that it is rated for +P I would change my vote to this...

Federal Hydra Shok +P LE 129 Grain 50 round box P38HS1G

https://www.sgammo.com/product/federal/50-round-box-38-special-p-federal-hydra-shok-le-129-grain-ammo-p38hs1g

It’s tough to find any 50 round boxes locally, they usually carry the 20 round box with crazy pricing. I order mine online from whoever has the best deal at the time.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those 129 gr Hydro shocks have never expanded in any test I have ever seen.  The HST micro is a good load though. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Patton said:

Those 129 gr Hydro shocks have never expanded in any test I have ever seen.  The HST micro is a good load though. 

I found this initially shocking to read because the Hydra Shok is such a well respected and effective bullet design. Then I checked out the gelatin tests for it and was flabbergasted at how terrible and erratic its performance was in a snub nosed .38. I guess it just goes to show that not every design works in every capacity. 

Edited by Chucktshoes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I carry Federal Gold Medal Match 148 gr wadcutters in my J-frame size .38’s (LCR currently). These are mild recoiling (so a person may actually practice with them), penetrate adequately, are very reliable, and accurate.

Trusted sources such as Dr. Gary K. Roberts, Claude Werner, and the late Jim Cirillo have recommended this type of round in the .38 snub revolvers, especially the light weight versions.

Expansion out of a snub would come at a price, that’d be muzzle blast and recoil, which would have the effect of greater shot to shot times. And that expansion would be “iffy” at best. Some rounds, such as the Gold Dot design can perform adequately (most of the time), but older designs such as Hydra Shok and Golden Saber perform much better in other calibers and longer barrels. Even the excellent HST design struggles out of snub nose revolvers from what I read.

The sharp ogive of a wadcutter has the potential to cut tissue and vessels vs “pushing” tissue and vessels aside as an unexpanded HP or a FMJ/LRN are prone to do.

Bullets do strange things in human beings. I’ve seen people shot with lots of different rounds and I am a firm believer that placement trumps design.  

I’d prefer to stop the attacker with as few well placed rounds as possible. Wadcutters should help you get those rounds accurately and quickly on target imho.

 

There’s some excellent snubbie revolver info on the Tactical Professor (Claude Werner) link below.

https://www.targetsportsusa.com/federal-gold-medal-38-special-ammo-148-grain-match-wadcutter-gm38a-p-1187.aspx

https://www.amazon.com/Guns-Bullets-Gunfights-Modern-Day-Gunfighter/dp/0873648773

https://tacticalprofessor.wordpress.com/category/revolvers/

Edited by Jamie Jackson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Jamie Jackson said:

Double tap...

 

Edited by Jamie Jackson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Jamie Jackson you mentioned speed thresholds for HP expansion, which reminded me that (at least a couple of years ago) the relatively old and basic Hornady Custom load was expanding more reliably in .380 than some of the newer fancier Critical Defense loads (which were geared more towards 9mm velocities, from what I understand).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TomInMN said:

@Jamie Jackson you mentioned speed thresholds for HP expansion, which reminded me that (at least a couple of years ago) the relatively old and basic Hornady Custom load was expanding more reliably in .380 than some of the newer fancier Critical Defense loads (which were geared more towards 9mm velocities, from what I understand).

I've read this as well and see a lot of professionals recommending FMJ ball ammo in .380 as expansion is relatively unlikely and penetration is so critical.

 

I don't know if it's still available or even manufactured, but Federal once produced their NyClad round for .38 spl. As I recall it was pretty much "dead lead" or a very soft coated lead bullet that had a good potential for deformation, especially when striking intermediate structures like bone. 

And there's the "rub" with gelatin tests. Human being are made up of many different tissues of varying densities, degrees of flexibility, and the ability to take a great deal of trauma and still function. Penetration is needed along with accurate delivery to strike to quite small critical areas.

Back in the early 2000's Fizzy Fletcher, in collaboration with  Mr. Cirillo, manufactured a round they sold as Safe Stop for .38 spl snubby revolvers. This was a plated 148 gr wadcutter with a very sharp ogive.

My notes from that time show the Safestop rounds I chronoed at an average of 721 fps, the SD was very low and the rounds incredibly accurate out of my 640 S&W. They had a "snappy" recoil, but very manageable. Alas Fuzzy got elected to some political office and the company went out of business.

FWIW I also see I chronoed some 129 gr Hydrashoks and they were all over the place velocity wise, 700-780 fps. But they fed easily from a speedloader or speedstrip. I keep either Winchester 158 gr LSWC HP or 135 gr GD on my speedstrips these days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well most folks know I am a big fan of Bersa 380 calibers and own several of them. We have had many discussions on the site regarding the stopping power behind a 380. I have spoke with people about this several times and some folks will say use Hornaday Critical Defense hollow points and you will be fine. Others say I should have all my 380's loaded with FMJ ball ammo. After many discussions with folks I decided I would split load my magazines. For every Hornaday round in the Magazine there is a Fiocchi FMJ ball round. Because I wanted to see how the guns reacted to the assorted rounds I went to the range with my Thunder and my model 85 and shot both of them. Both guns handled flawlessly and operated flawlessly so now that is how I am loaded with the ball ammo being the first round for penetration and the second round HHP for impact if it is needed. Opinions are welcome on my decision. Oh to add, I do also have about 8 back up mags for the Thunders and 3 back up mags for the Model 85 and at least one of them on the 85 is all Ball and 3 of the Thunders are al ball. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Jamie Jackson said:

I've read this as well and see a lot of professionals recommending FMJ ball ammo in .380 as expansion is relatively unlikely and penetration is so critical.

 

I don't know if it's still available or even manufactured, but Federal once produced their NyClad round for .38 spl. As I recall it was pretty much "dead lead" or a very soft coated lead bullet that had a good potential for deformation, especially when striking intermediate structures like bone. 

Unfortunately, Federal is no longer making them. I have on box left and that's what I have in my 442.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Jamie Jackson said:

I don't know if it's still available or even manufactured, but Federal once produced their NyClad round for .38 spl. As I recall it was pretty much "dead lead" or a very soft coated lead bullet that had a good potential for deformation, especially when striking intermediate structures like bone. 

 

27 minutes ago, Moped said:

Unfortunately, Federal is no longer making them. I have on box left and that's what I have in my 442.

The Nyclad was just to help prevent leading. Cleaning prevents leading.

I mean…it’s a 1 7/8” Airweight; its not like it’s a range gun…. right?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By xtriggerman
      This is a job I did for a friend. It took a bit of imagination to pull off but it all gelled as I modified the parts to fit. The Flux MP17 frame is for a drop in FCG from the Sig P320 in this case 9mm. The Flux has the well designed spring loaded brace that literally shoots out of the collapsed position via a strong spring and self locks into a rock solid extended position. I'm not a big Tactical gizmo guy but have to say, its pretty cool since its well designed and as solid as it gets. The rail started out as a China made mid length AR narrow Key-mod hand guard.
      Here is the front collar anchor made from stainless heavy wall pipe.

       I fabed up a left side cocking handle and put it in the most amount of meat at the front. The threads have been milled to match the bore contour of the inner slide. In the rough... It is then JB weld thread locked.

       This shot is just the plain Flux lower with my rear rail anchor block screwed up on top in the back there.... that scruffy looking pained thing.

      Handle in place

      Rail roughed in place

       Done, just 3 screws to remove for removal of a rock solid rail.


    • By TGO David
      While y'all were hoarding toilet paper and draining the supply chain of affordable ammo again, I picked up this little pup during the first week of the "Safer at Home" response to the COVID-19 Coronavirus.
       
      Sig Sauer P320 XCompact RXP with Sig Romeo 1 Pro Red Dot Sight

       
      In all honesty, I ordered it around the first of February and it just took far too long for the retailer to ship it.  I naively chose Locked and Loaded out of Pana, Illinois from the retailers that advertise through Gun.Deals due to them having the lowest price available on it.  In hindsight I would have paid more just to have not had to wait nearly four weeks, or having had to call my credit card company to start a claim against the retailer for failing to ship it in a reasonable time.  Avoid them like the plague.
      Boy does that phrase take on new meaning in the modern context.  But yes, avoid them like you would avoid COVID-19.
       
      Anyway, the gun itself is a fine little blaster and the Romeo 1 Pro is a nice piece of kit as well.  The original Romeo 1 (non Pro) was pretty frail and fragile as evidenced by Aaron Cowan at Sage Dynamics bieng able to effortlessly break it far earlier in the test than any other red dot had succumbed previously.  Watch that video!  Aaron's tests of red dot optics has become a go-to for me when researching new gear, so I was initially pretty wary of the Romeo 1 Pro as well.  But those concerns seem to perhaps be a little unfounded, as Sig has beefed this model up and given it a heavy aluminum shroud around the glass.
      What really eased my concerns, though, is that the Romeo 1 Pro has the same mounting footprint as the Leupold Delta Point Pro... which, while it was also pretty weak in Cowan's torture tests... has been chosen as the footprint du jour for one of Holosun's forthcoming releases.  And Holosun has been making some really fantastic, very rugged red dot sights lately.  Again, go back to Sage Dynamics' videos for his test of the 507C and I think maybe even the 508T at this point.
      Regardless, the fact that I should be able to swap the Romeo 1 Pro for a Holosun at some point seemed like a winner of an idea in case the Romeo Pro can't handle real life carry and use.
       
      Anyway... let's talk about the gun....
       

       
      I had a regular plain jane P320 Compact shortly after they came to market and just couldn't love it.  The grip design felt like a dry bar of soap in my hands.  It wasn't particularly ergonomic, lacked material in the places that would have allowed me to get more of a tight grip on it, and had mateiral in places that kept me from getting a firm enough grasp where it counted.
      I sold that gun fairly quickly.
      When the dimunitive P365 came out with the new and improved and grippier texture, I was greatly impressed.  And when the P320 X-Series came out with the same texture and a recontoured grip design, I was intrigued.  It just took me a hot minute to pick one up.
       
      First Shooting Impressions...
      1st - I liked the trigger, a lot.  I put about two solid weeks of dry-fire into the gun before I was finally able to get it to the range.  I was lucky to get to my favorite local outdoor shooting spot on a day that the pistol bays were fairly empty and therefore Chinese Virus (tm) free.  I spent enough time there to dial-in the dot and then run a few mags for function checking.
      2nd - There is no hiding the fact that it's a Sig with the typical higher-than-seems-necessary bore axis.  It flips a bit under recoil, but not too badly.
      3rd - While the ergos of the X-Series frame are lightyears beyond what the standard P320 has, it can still be better.  The grip texture isn't grippy enough and Sig strangely opted to leave smooth the area where your middle finger falls across the front strap beneath the trigger guard.  While that may seem smart from a comfort perspective, your middle finger is one of three that most folks apply the most gripping force with.  The other two being their thumb and index finger.
      I'd rather see some grippy texture where the middle finger falls so that I can really get some traction, especially with that high bore axis trying to flop the gun around in my hand when I put striker to primer.
      To remedy that, I'm expecting another X-Series Compact grip module soon from Chris over at 3 Golf Gunworks in North Carolina.  He's putting their "Autumn" texture on the module for me and it should have a lot more grip as a result.  Like the photo below, albeit in all black.

       
       
      Anyway, bottom line?  Really nice gun.  I like a lot of the things about it.  The trigger is good, the shape of the grip is good, the red dot optic seems good and has a nice big open window for quick and easy sighting, and it carries very comfortably in a Werkz M6 holster.  I stumbled across Jamison's company while searching for IWB light-bearing holsters for the P320 Compact and the Streamlight TLR-7 combo.  Not only is it a design similar to some of my other favorites (SAC Zulu, Henry Holsters Spark) but the M6 is one of their Quick Ship models that goes out in the mail in approximately 2-business days.
      I've added a pair of Pull-the-Dot soft loops that I had on hand since taking this pic.  Werkz offers those as an option in their web store, too.

       
      It's a shame about the grip texture, but at least grip modules are inexpensive (about $50 for the X-Compact) and there are numerous places to have them worked-over by competent "Stipplers".  Or you can try your hand at it yourself with a wood burning tool, a light touch and a steady hand.  And you aren't ruining a perfectly good gun since the grip module isn't the serialized part on the P320.
       
      I'm looking forward to more range time with it, but right now I think it's a solid choice and a good option for people who just don't want to recognize the fact that the Glock 19 and Glock 45 share the pinnacle of perfection. 
       
    • By NashvilleGlock45
      What are yalls input on Glock 45  gen5 I just bought it because I liked the 19x but didnt like the FDE,So I got The 45 in black .TIA

The Fine Print

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions. TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines