Jump to content

ANyone use Hard-cast lead ammo for .38 and semi-autos?


Recommended Posts

Hard cast is deeper penetrating than a hollow point -

Not generally accepted for a self defense round due to over penetration and pass thru-

I use hard cast for most of my target and range loads due to cost factor-I reload most everything I shoot-other than defensive rounds which I keep with good factory loads-

  • Like 2
Link to comment
55 minutes ago, chances R said:

Interesting, from your Branca background you would look at hardcadt for anything but wad cutters in snub revolvers.

It would be for j-frame Model 49, plus 9x18 or .380 as it seems that HPs in those calibers don't perform as one might wish. Take a look at this.

Wadcutters for SD

I would only carry factory ammo for SD, no handloads.

Edited by crc4
  • Like 2
Link to comment
1 hour ago, krunchnik said:

Hard cast is deeper penetrating than a hollow point -

Not generally accepted for a self defense round due to over penetration and pass thru-

I use hard cast for most of my target and range loads due to cost factor-I reload most everything I shoot-other than defensive rounds which I keep with good factory loads-

Yet, it seems that the low velocity of HP rounds shot in short barrels do not do well when going through material before reaching the subject, while the wadcutters do penetrate outer layers.

Plus there's the benefit of lower recoil with wadcutters. 

I'd like to see a side-by-side test using ballistic gel with denim material in front.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Defender said:

Branca?

Andrew Branca. An attorney who specializes in Self Defense law, Author of  The Law of Self Defense: The Indispensable Guide to the Armed Citizen

Those who teach how to react to a self-defense shooting advise to never carry handloads, only factory ammo as a prosecutor could attempt to make hay with a jury that your were carrying handloads 'designed to blowup, destroy, annihilate, and obliterate' any human flesh. 

Plus, forensics are unable to test handloads reliably due to the various recipes by handloaders as opposed to factory ammo with its known characteristics.

Factory loads are all I carry; not all I shoot, but all I carry for SD.

It's an excellent book that far too many SD people will never read.

Edited by crc4
  • Like 1
Link to comment

What little I've read is that lead hard cast ammo penetrates further than hollow point rounds and is only recommended as a self-defense round when you specifically need that feature (e.g., for wildlife).

The Ballistics by the Inch website might have some gel test data on hard cast in .38 or .357 - you may want to check that out.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Reloads much better then smile and wait for flash on compensator, other aggressive comments on a striker cover, social media comments…  attending self defense training classes has been twisted into you manufactured this event.  They come after you any way they can. So don’t carry +p ammo either.    

 
use what works for you. hard cast wouldn’t be my choice for concrete jungle predators.  
 

another internet option.  

 

Link to comment

Wadcutters as a Self Defense Load in Snubbies

I been hearing a lot about using hard-cast wadcutters in a snub nosed .38 from various sources I respect. The above is another article that gives additional info.

I usually have Remington +P in my Bodyguard, but have considered going with wadcutters again as I did when I was a detective. Something around 900 fps give or take.

Some +P ammo in a snubbie is almost like  a .357 in recoil and flash. Plus the accuracy and ability for faster follow-up shots makes me think I may go back to wadcutters, particularly if I can find a factory load that keeps it around 900fps.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment

Actually there are some 38+p loads in jpg which test out quite well. It is an old but check out Lucky Gunner ammo tests

Two problems with hard cast are excessive penetration and availability in factory loading

There are a couple made for defense. However usually when you see a factory lead 38 it is a mild load for general use or dedicated target shooting

I must also say that while having loaded many semi-was cutter bullets, they were never done with the intention of self defense.

For me a 38+p jhp or go directly to 347 jhp

btw, did you ever try shooting a reversed hollow base wadcutter into gel. Try it sometime. Wimpy penetration. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
2 hours ago, JustEd said:

Actually there are some 38+p loads in jpg which test out quite well. It is an old but check out Lucky Gunner ammo tests

Two problems with hard cast are excessive penetration and availability in factory loading

There are a couple made for defense. However usually when you see a factory lead 38 it is a mild load for general use or dedicated target shooting

I must also say that while having loaded many semi-was cutter bullets, they were never done with the intention of self defense.

For me a 38+p jhp or go directly to 347 jhp

btw, did you ever try shooting a reversed hollow base wadcutter into gel. Try it sometime. Wimpy penetration. 

Never shot the reversed wadcutters into gel, but in those days .38 special SD loads were rare, with many officers carrying round-nose for ease of reloading. My reversed wadcutters were probably closer to +p loads as they were strong in recoil and snappiness, but less than a 2' .357. At 10-15 yards they seemed to be accurate enough with a tendency to keyhole. I never had to shoot anyone with them, but I did believe they would do the trick.

After checking around I'm going to try some of the hard-cast loads and some Honey Badger loads.

I'm a fan of my Bodyguard as a good BU revolver, particularly in wintertime when I can have my hand on the gun in my pocket without drawing any attention and if necessary shoot through the pocket without hanging up as an auto might.

Thanks for your response.

Edited by crc4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
5 hours ago, crc4 said:

Never shot the reversed wadcutters into gel, but in those days .38 special SD loads were rare, with many officers carrying round-nose for ease of reloading. My reversed wadcutters were probably closer to +p loads as they were strong in recoil and snappiness, but less than a 2' .357. At 10-15 yards they seemed to be accurate enough with a tendency to keyhole. I never had to shoot anyone with them, but I did believe they would do the trick.

After checking around I'm going to try some of the hard-cast loads and some Honey Badger loads.

I'm a fan of my Bodyguard as a good BU revolver, particularly in wintertime when I can have my hand on the gun in my pocket without drawing any attention and if necessary shoot through the pocket without hanging up as an auto might.

Thanks for your response.

Same fun here, well one of them. Appreciate you wanting the best load. Have you ever made hardcast hbwc?  I did cast bullets years ago, but the hollow base seemed to difficult. The factory hbwc were all fairly soft lead. That made sense as the idea is for the hollow base to expand and seal against the rifling during firing.  At least for the normal loading. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
41 minutes ago, JustEd said:

Same fun here, well one of them. Appreciate you wanting the best load. Have you ever made hardcast hbwc?  I did cast bullets years ago, but the hollow base seemed to difficult. The factory hbwc were all fairly soft lead. That made sense as the idea is for the hollow base to expand and seal against the rifling during firing.  At least for the normal loading. 

The ones I had handloaded for me were semi-hardcast - harder that normal wadcutters but certainly not the hardcast almost indestructible bullets I see today. I believe I still have some in my safe that are almost 48 years old. 

Link to comment

Should try them out then. The factory ones I have used actually had a very slight inward taper towards the base.  While it made seating the bullet in case easy, it also necessitated using a tighter crimp than usual. 
 

just fyi. Have fun with it 😀

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Have hand loaded a bunch of 148 grainers in the old days.  Generally to about 850 to 900 fps.  They work like a charm... They will tend to keyhole at ranges over 40 yards or so.

Loaded the 158 LSWC at 5.3 grains of Unique with anybody's brass n primers for about 900 fps... This one is the " FBI Load " as I remember.  They work best in K frame pistols n shoot very well.  

Leroy...

  • Like 2
Link to comment

I like hard cast 158 gr. swc. in both Hp and solid. I've even loaded some 170 gr. swc in .38 cases. I've never tried them to see what kind of penetration they get but, should be good. I've shot some 124 gr. cast RN in 9mm too.

Edited by Quavodus
  • Like 2
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.