Jump to content

South Carolina Sheriff Causes Controversy For Urging Women to Carry Concealed


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest blackbeltchick

I really like this sheriff! I wish he was the sheriff in our town, he is not only willing to voice his beliefs but a lot of my beliefs. He needs to be thanked not put down for wanting people to protect them selves. IMO

Link to comment
I really like this sheriff! I wish he was the sheriff in our town, he is not only willing to voice his beliefs but a lot of my beliefs. He needs to be thanked not put down for wanting people to protect them selves. IMO

Agreed!! But so many nut jobs in the world I don't ever see people like this guy being awarded with anything.

Link to comment
  • 3 months later...
"He's blaming the victim," said Melonea Marek, executive director of People Against Rape.

No, he's attempting to help empower other, potential victims.

And Caroline Brewer, spokeswoman for the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, told Reuters that a 2009 study found that people who carry guns are 4.5 times more likely to be shot than people who don't.

And people who drive cars are more likely to be involved in car wrecks. I wouldn't be surprised if that 'study' included people who carry guns and use them for things like armed robbery, etc. Of course those folks are going to be at an 'increased risk'. I wonder if it includes LEO, as well - being that their jobs would likely increase their risk. That statistic just sounds suspect, to me, and I would have trouble believing that a law abiding, private citizen who legally carries increases his or her risk of being shot by that great a factor.

Link to comment

'Liberals'.

I'd bet cash money that Melonea Marek could care less about women who decline to be victims. Her organization needs rape victims in order to generate cash.

As for Brady, they lie. They've lied for years, been caught out many times. If they said the sky was blue I'd expect an eclipse. Any resemblance to actual facts on their part is purely accidental and entirely unintended.

Link to comment

No, he's attempting to help empower other, potential victims.

And people who drive cars are more likely to be involved in car wrecks. I wouldn't be surprised if that 'study' included people who carry guns and use them for things like armed robbery, etc. Of course those folks are going to be at an 'increased risk'. I wonder if it includes LEO, as well - being that their jobs would likely increase their risk. That statistic just sounds suspect, to me, and I would have trouble believing that a law abiding, private citizen who legally carries increases his or her risk of being shot by that great a factor.

You are correct about the study. It does not take into account many factors that would eliminate them from the study. It's just like every other anti-gun "study": full of holes that are pointed out the day after the study is released. But glaring flaws have never stopped Brady from touting a study for years after it was debunked.

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...
Guest cardcutter

The whole primis of gun control is that a woman lying dead in an alley, strangled by her own panty hose ,after a brutal rape is somehow moraly superior to the woman explaing to the cops why she shot her attacker.

Link to comment

In 1972 or 73 there was an escaped convict rapist prowling around Augusta Ga. The local police and sheriff urged women to carry a gun, no permit required. We were notified that there would be no prosecutions for carrying a gun as long as the louse was free.

Edited by enfield
Link to comment

:up: to mrl4ng and cardcutter. Definitely agree.

I was recently surprised to hear about the gun confiscation that happened during Hurriane Katrina. When I told a fellow firearms fan about it, he actually sided with the government. And while I can see what the government was trying to do, I still can't stand by them taking away people's guns. Thoughts?

Link to comment

:up: to mrl4ng and cardcutter. Definitely agree.

I was recently surprised to hear about the gun confiscation that happened during Hurriane Katrina. When I told a fellow firearms fan about it, he actually sided with the government. And while I can see what the government was trying to do, I still can't stand by them taking away people's guns. Thoughts?

Haha thats a long topic worthy of a new thread....but your not gonna get anyone siding with the gun confiscators.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.