Jump to content

LC9S vs 638 bodyguard air weight


Troutburger

Recommended Posts

I carry a 638. I love the concept of a small single stack striker fired 9MM. My problem is that I just do not have confidence in the reliability of any of the small autos. I realize that some of them are 99% reliable but I am always afraid if I ever needed one, I would find myself with the 1% of the time that it did not work. If I ever need to use a gun, I will be so stressed out that I certainly will not want the extra stress of wondering if my gun might not work.I have a Ruger LCP that I carry when I have to have something truly concealable. So far it has been flawless. I still do not trust it nearly as much as the 638.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

I'd go with the LC9... more capacity, easier reloads, better sights, thinner, lighter trigger...    

 

Airweights are perfectly good guns, I just don't like them.  The few I've shot have been awful from a recoil, muzzle blast, and accuracy perspective.

Link to comment

I'd go with the S&W Shield more capacity, easier reloads, better sights, thinner, lighter trigger....

I fixed it for you!

If you are recoil sensitive at all I would stay clear of Airweights and LC9's. You pay a price for light and powerful.

Seriously, I love S&W revolvers but I do not necessarily love Airweights. A 640/36/60 or the like models that weigh 20oz shoot so much better. I have not shot a LC9 of any version so I can't say anything about them. I have heard they handle about the same as a Pf9 which is almost painful. My Shield however is Remarkably easy to shoot without costing more.


Something else, if you go the j frame route I would caution you that shrouded hammer revolvers have all the bad aspects of the hammer models and enclosed models without much to gain. Dirt, moisture, coins, and everything else finds its way into the funnel created by the shroud. My grandfather told me stories of cops with them that stood out in he rain at a crime scene in the 70's and didn't clean the inside of their Bodyguards. The following month they went to shoot them and they had seized up and didn't work until soaked in oil. It is also believed that a hard fall can be enough to close the shroud onto the hammer to where it will lock up. If you drop an enclosed hammer model like a 642 you will just dent it. If you drop a chief special like a 637 you will just nick or break off the hammer spur, but it will probably still work. You will never have a justifiable self defense situation to where you will be able to use a single action trigger and that is all an airweight is for is carry and self defense. Edited by Patton
  • Like 1
Link to comment

I fixed it for you!

If you are recoil sensitive at all I would stay clear of Airweights and LC9's. You pay a price for light and powerful.

Seriously, I love S&W revolvers but I do not necessarily love Airweights. A 640/36/60 or the like models that weigh 20oz shoot so much better. I have not shot a LC9 of any version so I can't say anything about them. I have heard they handle about the same as a Pf9 which is almost painful. My Shield however is Remarkably easy to shoot without costing more.

 

 

Got a Shield9 for the wife, it's a very good choice was well. 

Link to comment

Something else, if you go the j frame route I would caution you that shrouded hammer revolvers have all the bad aspects of the hammer models and enclosed models without much to gain. Dirt, moisture, coins, and everything else finds its way into the funnel created by the shroud. My grandfather told me stories of cops with them that stood out in he rain at a crime scene in the 70's and didn't clean the inside of their Bodyguards. The following month they went to shoot them and they had seized up and didn't work until soaked in oil. It is also believed that a hard fall can be enough to close the shroud onto the hammer to where it will lock up. If you drop an enclosed hammer model like a 642 you will just dent it. If you drop a chief special like a 637 you will just nick or break off the hammer spur, but it will probably still work. You will never have a justifiable self defense situation to where you will be able to use a single action trigger and that is all an airweight is for is carry and self defense.

 

Jamming up from pocket lint etc is something I never considered. Good to know. Thanks for the advise!

Link to comment

Jamming up from pocket lint etc is something I never considered. Good to know. Thanks for the advise!


The shroud is a funnel and a coin accidentally dropped into the wrong pocket is far more of a concern than lint.
To be honest it may not be any worse than some of the holes and crevices on an auto but the centennial models like the 642/442 do not have that issue.

You may want to read this from a couple of months ago:
http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/topic/75544-opinions-on-sw-airweights/
Link to comment

I second what Patton said about the all-steel j-frames like the 640, and how much better they feel to shoot than the airweights.  I love my 640, but I had to part company with my 442.  It literally hurt the webbing of my hand to shoot it (I think it was the exposed backstrap more than anything).  You do have a bit more weight in the 640 and like models if you want to pocket-carry them, so there is that consideration too.  I personally chose to take my chances with the weight... Good luck on your choice!

Link to comment
I have a 638 air weight, and a Shield in 9mm. You're welcome to shoot one or both if you want to try before you buy. Just let me know and I'll drop them by. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - [URL=http://tapatalk.com/m?id=1]now Free[/URL]
  • Like 1
Link to comment

I have a LC9, and had S&W Bodyguard .38 A buddy of mine had the 638, and I was able to shoot it on occasion. He sold it and got a SW Shield and I sold my Bodyguard. 

 

I prefer the LC9 to a revolver

 

1.) Capacity 7+1 rounds vs 5 Rounds

2.) Reloading the speed strip is roughly the size of a spare LC9 mag, but it is much easier to shove a 7 round mag in to the LC9 vs 2 rounds at a time with a "speed strip".

3.) Recoil, 9mm semi auto seemed less then a .38+p. But regardless they both suck. 

4.) Size the LC9 is thinner thus easier to put in your waistline. 

5.) Sights. XS big dots on the LC9 makes the gun much easier to shoot vs (as far as i know) no after market sights for 638 and only a front site for the Bodyguard .38

 

With all that said... Id rather have a Shield then the LC9

Edited by jmevis
Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

The Bodyguard is very concealable.  Hitting the center of a target, however, is NOT easy.   It is not my favorite carry gun but it does get used some.  It is also not easy to field strip without tools which is important to me.  Glocks are king here, I suppose.

Link to comment
The striker fired LC9s is a huge improvement over the original LC9. I own both and after carrying my LC9 for over a year, it's now sitting in the gun cabinet and the 9s goes with me daily. Love the new trigger in the LC9s. A few other often overlooked (in the ads) changes are the removal of the big red pop-up loaded chamber indicator and a minor redo of the manual safety. The LC9 safety always seemed stiff to me and not simmering I'd ever consider actually using because I didn't want to fiddle with it in a stressful situation. I never used it because I figured the LC9's trigger was enough to keep me from firing accidentally during unholstering. The LC9s safety is easier to move with the thumb and smoother. I still don't use it, but if I did, I'd feel better about it. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Edited by SamZzz
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.