Jump to content

Sig Brace ILLEGAL to shoulder


Recommended Posts

I am just copying and pasting from another forum ..... Could be BS but the letter looks rather legit.... You be the judge
 
 
"Just posted tonight in a local gun group. This is the first specific letter I have seen dealing with the sig brace, and an AR15. This is not the same letter that you have all seen, it is new, as in tonight. Or you can wait a couple days or so and I am sure TAG or some other better late than never gun blog will have it in there."

4eXqocy.jpg]http://i.imgur.com/4eXqocy.jpg]

----------------------------

Edit to add new pics of entire letter that I received from the individual that wrote the inquiry.

YnA2mTj.jpg]http://i.imgur.com/YnA2mTj.jpg]

O7EOpTm.jpg]http://i.imgur.com/O7EOpTm.jpg]

SBJBf3b.jpg]http://i.imgur.com/SBJBf3b.jpg]

Edited by mcordell
Link to comment
Just glancing over this letter it says the Sig brace "is not intended or designed to shoot from the shoulder". I'm not seeing that it is saying it is "illegal" to do so. At least I hope not. I am working towards a SBR 9mm and plan on using a Sig brace which will probably at some point be used as a shoulder stock
Link to comment
And so it begins. Confusion by the ATF and a previously legal item is now illegal based on how it is used.

What sucks for us in Tennessee is it is illegal to have a long gun, loaded or unloaded, ion your person outside of a vehicle unless certain criteria are met. You cannot just carry around a rifle like you do with a pistol, either with or without a HCP.
Link to comment
Also, wonder if shouldering a bare buffer tube will soon be illegal as well.

The NFA needs to go away in a major way. Why should it matter whether I shoot from the shoulder or not? The rounds are just as effective regardless whether I shoulder it or not.

Bet a lot of people will be returning their Christmas gifted Sig braces now.
  • Like 3
Link to comment

Well damn... Depending on how this shakes out I may sell mine AR PISTOL build. If I cant shoulder it then I don't want it. I have no desire to screw with SBR paperwork.

I don't see anything in this letter that suggests all AR pistols are now illegal to shoulder.

 

"If this device [meaning the SiG brace] ... is assembled to a pistol and used as a shoulder stock...."

 

But it will be interesting to see if they try changing their interpretation of the law in other details as regard AR pistols.

Link to comment

I don't see anything in this letter that suggests all AR pistols are now illegal to shoulder.

"If this device [meaning the SiG brace] ... is assembled to a pistol and used as a shoulder stock...."

But it will be interesting to see if they try changing their interpretation of the law in other details as regard AR pistols.


You just contradicted yourself. My AR-15 pistol has the brace and I want to shoulder it.. Apparently that is no longer allowed.

Did I misinterpret something?
Link to comment

I plan on leaving the state of Florida in the near future and taking these across state lines is a nightmare.

It's not worth it.

 

I received my approved Form 5320.20 to take my SBR into Kentucky.  The form was approved for Nov 2014 through Nov 2015.  Letter was approved/returned to me in less than 10 days.

 

In my experience, with NFA friendly states and provided you are going to a single address in the neighbor state, it's not a big deal.

Link to comment
Also, realize you CANNOT carry a SBR or any rifle on your person outside a vehicle. This is a deal breaker for me to SBR my shorty AK "pistol".

I will say this will get a huge response from the shooting community. There are 10's of thousands of people who have bought the Sig brave because it can be shouldered. Now their $130 brace cannot be used the way they intended it so there will be a huge response, along with lawsuits, to determine whether use can change the classification.

Think about this. If the opinion states use is what determines what something is then you could argue installing machine gun parts are not illegal unless you actually fire it in full auto. Or a rifle with a 10" barrel is not an SBR unless it is shouldered.

Personally I hope the courts determine there is ok difference between an SBR and a pistol and do away with the NFA requirement to register what amounts to a "pistol" with a shoulder stock.
  • Like 1
Link to comment

All very interesting lately.

 

- Now we have three letters from two different "Acting Chiefs" of this "Technology Industry Services Branch" that directly conflict with the letters by John Spenser, previous Chief, and  by Earl Griffith, the current Chief of the (I assume) more top level Firearm Technology Branch.

 

- Both the Black Aces letter and this letter dated in October and November, by Mr. Max M. Kingery who was "acting Chief" of the TISB.

 

- Note that Mr. Kingery's tenure was evidently somewhat short lived, as the Shockwave Blade letter is dated December 15, as is signed by TISB "acting Chief" Michael R. Curtis, presumably replacing him in this "acting" capacity.

 

Perhaps this will force the issue such that ATF has to release an actually official blanket ruling rather than the ongoing series of letters to individuals. And if that ruling says that how a legally configured firearm is actually used determines the difference between lawful use and a felony, I would expect court action to follow. Whether that would take an actual individual being charged first or not I don't know

 

The bottom line is though, that short of issues of public safety (think autos and flammables for example), conservation/ecology (think pesticides/hunting laws for example), or of course crimes committed against others, I can think of no area of law where how one actually utilizes an otherwise legal possession determines criminal behavior. I would posit that is a principle that is more basic that merely the area of firearm law itself.

 

But even within the context of just firearm law itself, this decision seems tantamount to ruling that firing a handgun using two hands or firing a stocked rifle or shotgun from the hip would also change the classification of the weapon also, with whatever attendant legalities that could ensue from that behavior, rather than the actual configuration of the weapon.

 

- OS

Edited by Oh Shoot
Link to comment

Also, wonder if shouldering a bare buffer tube will soon be illegal as well.

The NFA  BATFE needs to go away in a major way. Why should it matter whether I shoot from the shoulder or not? The rounds are just as effective regardless whether I shoulder it or not.

Bet a lot of people will be returning their Christmas gifted Sig braces now.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

All very interesting lately.

 

- Now we have three letters from this "Technology Industry Services Branch" that directly conflict with the letters by John Spenser, previous Chief, and  by Earl Griffith, the current Chief of the (I assume) more top level Firearm Technology Branch.

 

- Both the Black Aces letter and this letter dated in October and November, by Mr. Max M. Kingery who was "acting Chief" of the TISB.

 

- Note that Mr. Kingery's tenure was evidently somewhat short lived, as the Shockwave Blade letter is dated December 15, as is signed by TISB "acting Chief" Michael R. Curtis, presumably replacing him in this "acting" capacity.

 

Perhaps this will force the issue such that ATF has to release an actually official blanket ruling rather than the ongoing series of letters to individuals. And if that ruling says that how a legally configured firearm is actually used determines the difference between lawful use and a felony, I would expect court action to follow. Whether that would take an actual individual being charged first or not I don't know

 

The bottom line is though, that short of issues of public safety (think autos and flammables for example), conservation/ecology (think pesticides/hunting laws for example), or of course crimes committed against others, I can think of no area of law where how one actually utilizes an otherwise legal possession determines criminal behavior. I would posit that is a principle that is more basic that merely the area of firearm law itself.

 

But even within the context of just firearm law itself, this decision seems tantamount to ruling that firing a handgun using two hands or firing a stocked rifle or shotgun from the hip would also change the classification of the weapon also, with whatever attendant legalities that could ensue from that behavior, rather than the actual configuration of the weapon.

 

- OS

 

Are you going to continue shouldering your Pistol until we have a formal letter or ruling? 

 

I watched a video online by Sootch00, he brought up a good point. If her were to hold his Glock/Sig, etc up to his shoulder and fire it, it doesn't suddenly become something else. We shall see if the ATF agrees. 

Link to comment

If anybody wants to follow the saga in chronological order:

 

1. Original SIG brace approval letter:
11/26/12 - John R. Spencer, Chief, Firearms Technology Branch

 

SIG Brace legal to add to a pistol, no mention of "usage"

------------------

2. Sgt. Bradley Letter:
3/5/14 - Max M. Kingery "signing for" Earl Griffith, Chief, Firearms Technology Branch (whatever that exactly means)

 

Using brace "improperly" in way not intended by manufacturer does NOT change classification of firearm

-----------------

3. Black Aces Letter:
10/28/14 - Max M. Kingery, ACTING Chief, Firearms Technology Industry Services Branch

 

Shouldering the short barreled shotgun type "firearm" would make it an SBS. Also without mentioning it, allowed buffer tube/brace to add to the legal OAL of a firearm which did not require it for operation, thereby extending the current operating procedure of what constitutes the "firearm" for purposes of measuring OAL.

----------------

4. Current letter under discussion:
11/10/14 - Max M. Kingery, ACTING Chief, Firearms Technology Industry Services Branch

 

Shouldering AR pistol with SIG brace makes it an SBR

-----------------

5. Shockwave Blade Letter:
12/15/14 - Michael R. Curtis, ACTING Chief, Firearms Technology Industry Services Branch

 

Shouldering any pistol with Shockwave Blade makes it an SBR

-------------------------

 

Note that if Max "signing for" Earl in the Bradley letter means Max wrote it, then he has directly contradicted his own opinion in both the Black Aces letter and this one.

 

- OS

Edited by Oh Shoot
  • Like 1
Link to comment

You just contradicted yourself. My AR-15 pistol has the brace and I want to shoulder it.. Apparently that is no longer allowed.

Did I misinterpret something?

Yes, you didn't read the letter or my post very carefully.  The passage I quoted deals with AR pistols that have the SiG brace and are shouldered.  It doesn't say anything about the legality of shouldering AR pistols that don't have the SiG brace....which I suspect is the great majority of AR pistols.  I realize this letter is a blow to SiG brace owners, but it doesn't mean that all AR pistols on the earth are now illegal to shoulder fire.  Of course, BATFE may be planning to move in that direction....

 

Cheers,

Whisper

Link to comment

Are you going to continue shouldering your Pistol until we have a formal letter or ruling? 

 

Not worried about it for now, at least for where I normally shoot.

 

Hell, if somebody else would pay for defense I might volunteer to be a test case. :)

 

Also, ironically, none of these "letter decisions" specifically mention that an AK pistol with SIG brace becomes an SBR if shouldered, and the Bradley letter specifically allows firing from the shoulder with any pistol, so at least half my SIG brace usage is so far not verboten even by any letter, to whatever degree they will or even can be actually enforced.

 

- OS

Edited by Oh Shoot
Link to comment

Think about this. If the opinion states use is what determines what something is then you could argue installing machine gun parts are not illegal unless you actually fire it in full auto.


Here's an example of that, there are many more..
http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_6_17/436565_M_16_trigger_group__in_an_AR_15.html

I have a buddy that has a RDIAS with several hosts, when he leaves the range he'll pull all the FCG except the host he decides to leave the rdias in, not worth getting caught..
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.