Jump to content

Antlered Deer Defined


Recommended Posts

So TWRA has redefined what an antlered deer is and a button buck (nubs) is now considered a buck for reporting purposes.  They have also now added the antlered doe to the definition though until last year I had no idea some does had antlers.  I guess it now stands that if an antler goes above the hairline it is now considered antlered.  Correct me if I'm wrong but I think last year it had to be more than 3 inches to be considered antlered, right?
 

Quote

 

Antlered Deer.PNG

Page 23 of the regulations

 

I think this is going to put some in precarious situations when they already harvested their 2 bucks, they will now either have to risk a citation or leave a buck to rot.  My shots are no longer than 100 yards at any given time but I find it hard to see small spikes even at that distance.  I won't knowingly shoot a button buck or a spike but I also don't hunt for trophies so smaller buck are fair game to me.  I understand those that want to harvest bigger bucks will like this, but the rest of us should not be forced into QDM if they are meat hunters.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

You are correct that in the past the antler had to be at least three inches to be considered an antlered deer.

Since the doe harvest is very liberal, i wonder if to many young bucks were being shot.  This should not really affect meat hunters.  Really, how many bucks have you shot that the antler was past the hair line but under three inches.  Not many I am guessing.  Plus, if you hunt all seasons you can take something like 300+ does in unit L.

 

If you have already harvested your two bucks then you simply don't shoot if you can't politely identify whether it is a buck or doe.

I really don't think that this will turn out to be a big deal.  :2cents:

 

 

Link to comment

I hunt does, so unless it has spots or I can tell that it is a fawn I will harvest it.  Telling a large doe from a medium one is difficult, specially when there is nothing out there to compare them to.  As for bucks, yea I'll take a buck, but whether it has spikes or a 10 point rack makes no difference to me.  I have shot deer that turned out to have decent racks, though due to the branches in the area I couldn't tell until I went up to them.  That is why I don't hunt in areas where it has to have a 15" spread or other measuring guideline, just too much guessing for me.

I check all my game online, makes it much easier for me since I like to take the hide and the head off before I take it home.  But I don't misrepresent my harvest, even when a spike will keep me from getting another buck, just doesn't make sense to break the law in that way.  I would rather end my season early than to do that.  But at the same time I don't like the regulations to be written so as to put people in positions that may have them break the law.  Just like the bait rule, there is no distance given so you can technically be cited for hunting over bait if your neighbor has a feeding station near your property line which you are not aware of.

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
7 hours ago, Omega said:

I hunt does, so unless it has spots or I can tell that it is a fawn I will harvest it.  Telling a large doe from a medium one is difficult, specially when there is nothing out there to compare them to.  As for bucks, yea I'll take a buck, but whether it has spikes or a 10 point rack makes no difference to me.  I have shot deer that turned out to have decent racks, though due to the branches in the area I couldn't tell until I went up to them.  That is why I don't hunt in areas where it has to have a 15" spread or other measuring guideline, just too much guessing for me.

I check all my game online, makes it much easier for me since I like to take the hide and the head off before I take it home.  But I don't misrepresent my harvest, even when a spike will keep me from getting another buck, just doesn't make sense to break the law in that way.  I would rather end my season early than to do that.  But at the same time I don't like the regulations to be written so as to put people in positions that may have them break the law.  Just like the bait rule, there is no distance given so you can technically be cited for hunting over bait if your neighbor has a feeding station near your property line which you are not aware of.

 

I could be wrong, but I thought the baiting rule was changed recently to 250yds. I haven't looked it up in a while though.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
40 minutes ago, Wingshooter said:

I could be wrong, but I thought the baiting rule was changed recently to 250yds. I haven't looked it up in a while though.

 

 

I looked in the current rulebook but didn't find any distance listed, but yea I seem to remember there was a clarification last year.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
12 hours ago, Wingshooter said:

I could be wrong, but I thought the baiting rule was changed recently to 250yds. I haven't looked it up in a while though.

 

 

I think the issue is adjacent property. How am I supposed to know if the next guy over is baiting?  If I'm on the edge of my property with my back to the property line, there could be bait 50 yards behind me and I'd have no way of knowing that. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
13 hours ago, peejman said:

I think the issue is adjacent property. How am I supposed to know if the next guy over is baiting?  If I'm on the edge of my property with my back to the property line, there could be bait 50 yards behind me and I'd have no way of knowing that. 

Yep. You're right about that. Same thing if you're on a lease. I wish the no baiting law would disappear.

 

Link to comment

Maybe this antler restriction ruling won't effect hunters to much. If some hunters shoot a deer that they think is  antlerless, some may shoot a young buck with small spikes through the skin. That's where the problem might be. I've not killed a antlerless deer in about 8 years though. I usually try and shoot decent bucks.

Meat hunters may need to be careful.

Link to comment

Well at least it's written well, not much room for misunderstanding the new rule.  Last year's rule concerning the private land Hunt week ended up having some bucks taken though it was a doe only season.  At least not many citations were given due to the TWRA seeing it was honest mistakes.

Link to comment
  • 2 years later...

I thought I'd resurrect this thread with an update. It seems TWRA, has went back to the old definition of antlered deer, 3" spikes or better, starting this 2018 season.  And apparently, the regs will now be good for 2 seasons 18'-19'.  Also changed but effective in July, is no deer urine scents will be allowed, only synthetic. 

Quote

While it will not become law until July 1, 2019, the commission, noting concerns over the potential of Chronic Wasting Disease finding its way into Tennessee, voted to ban the use of cervid lures with urine. There is concern nationwide that the disease could be passed through tainted urine. Synthetic deer and elk lures, readily available on the market, would still be legal.

I use scents, but not 100% convinced they work all that good, so no big deal for me, but I know a few guys like to put out mock scrapes, so it may affect them next year.

Edited by Omega
Speeling
Link to comment
  • 9 months later...

Since tomorrow starts the season again, I'm bumping this in case somebody missed it in the new regs like I did, but they changed the rules again on natural scents.  Page 15 and 37 of the 19-20 regs says we can again use natural scents but it must have an ATA seal of approval on it.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.