dennis.r.bible
-
Posts
6 -
Joined
-
Feedback
0%
Content Type
Forums
Events
Store
Articles
Posts posted by dennis.r.bible
-
-
I saw a headline in knoxnews.com that a second lawsuit was filed, but I could not read the article because I refuse to subscribe to that rag. Does anyone know anything about it?
Sent from my 831C using Tapatalk -
That makes sense, when I first read it I thought it meant that only officers from that county could carry. I was thinking it was odd to not allow officers from other jurisdictions to carry there.Punisher, do you ever drink that Guiness for breakfast sometime on gameday if you go tailgating? I'm sure it would make a nice substitute for bud light and scrambled eggs that I know some folks back home eat. You don't have to cook anything with that Guiness! Ha Ha.
e) In counties having a population of not less than thirty thousand two hundred (30,200) nor more than thirty thousand four hundred seventy-five (30,475) or not less than one hundred eighteen thousand four hundred (118,400) nor more than one hundred eighteen thousand seven hundred (118,700), according to the 1990 federal census or any subsequent federal census, the authority conferred by this section shall only apply to law enforcement officers who are law enforcement officers for those counties or law enforcement officers for municipalities located therein.
I read this today when not working to have a more clear mind. I kind of think that this statute means that the only Bedford and Rutherford police/deputies that can carry anywhere off duty are the city police and the sheriff's deputies.
I have a feeling there is some other police/security force in those counties that the statute wants to limit off duty carry. Someone mentioned a school police force in a previous post.
Did we ever get confirmation for what this section means? I visit Rutherford county several times a year.
Sent from my 831C using Tapatalk
Any progress on TN no permit to carry bill?
in 2A Legislation and Politics
Posted
Sent from my 831C using Tapatalk