.jpeg.c37ff0a59d01df0ac85b1b85a548916c.jpeg)
WindHawk
-
Posts
263 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Feedback
100%
Content Type
Forums
Events
Store
Articles
Posts posted by WindHawk
-
-
From his mug shot, orange seems to look OK on him. Maybe, just maybe, he'll get to wear it 24/7 for a while.
-
If you're posting for a regional event, you're welcome to title it appropriately - maybe leading with the City/Region in the title.
We've got a bunch of members that will travel a couple of hours to events - training, gun shows, etc...
Truthfully, we favor more visibility as opposed to less.
+1 on McGyver's thoughts. Read the header; decide if you're interested. The event/item will determine how far I'll travel or work out the shipping issues.
-
What do you expect... at an "NAACP Image Awards" event?
I'm constantly amazed at the mentality of Hollywood and the "entertainment" industry. They claim to want guns banned and everyone to live in a "love fest" world but make their money on movies and TV shows filled with violence... guns everywhere, good guys shoot, bad guys shot, multiple killings by various gruesome methods, kidnappings, mutilations, prime time displays of corpses in the morgue, etc.
I've considered picking a channel, any channel, and counting the violence and firearms shown between 6:30 and 10 some night; then I come to my senses and ask myself... why? It won't make any difference; nothing will change.
-
1
-
-
If I were going to get into that game I would get these sights: http://www.tech-sights.com/ruger3.htm and put them on a standard wood stock 10/22. o
If you want to make that gun shoot really good then I would send the trigger to Brimstone and just get the Tier 3 for 38.50: http://www.brimstonegunsmithing.com/collections/ruger-10-22/products/tier-3-basic-10-22-trigger-work But then I would send the barrel to Randy at CPC and get it rechambered and crowned: http://www.ct-precision.com/ruger10-22.html I would then either buy a Kidd bolt or have Randy at CPC clean up the OEM bolt at the same time he does your barrel. After that I would bed the action and put a pressure pad under the barrel.
Here is what Appleseed says: chrome-extension://bpmcpldpdmajfigpchkicefoigmkfalc/views/app.html
+1 on Graycrait's first suggestion as a beginning point, then add the second if she has enough interest . A "factory" 10-22 with Tech sights, swivels and a canvas sling has earned many shooters a rifleman patch.
The Ruger is the most popular but some people like the Marlin 795 for Appleseed. They actually make a factory LTR version complete w/Tech sights and sling that's available for about $200 on-line. Either way you end up with a nice .22LR shooter for a decent investment.
One thing to keep in mind - the most accuracy needed to shoot rifleman is about 4 MOA (hit a square inch target at 25 yards). In three of the four stages the targets are larger. The "devil" is in shooting the required sequence of positions/targets/firing patterns within the time limits while doing the reloads. It's all about learning how to be a rifleman that can lay down effective fire rapidly not about sharpshooter/sniper accuracy. Plus some US history for emphasis.
Plus It's a lot of fun. I strongly suggest that you shoot both days when you go. They are different. You'll learn a lot but there's no room for ego. I saw combat veterans that had to "unlearn/relearn" to improve their scoring. Should be a great weekend with your daughter.
-
1
-
-
Me + 2 more definitely interested. Just need to hear the details as they come available.
-
Great group of folks. Welcome!
-
Howdy!
-
I can see it both ways. I've waited to vote on election day and "lost" my vote because of conflicts I couldn't work out; I've enjoyed the opportunity to vote early and "avoid the lines".
As far as recruiting voters, the same opportunity exists for all parties. Can't say I agree with it but anyone that believes politics is a nicey, nice let's play fair activity isn't very in tune with the real world.
-
1
-
-
Don't confuse morality with legality here.
Morally, if you are equipped to save lives and feel you can do so at some acceptable risk to yourself, you probably should.
Legally, its everyone for themselves. If they were too stupid to carry a gun, you aren't obligated to save them.
Exactly.
-
That's Fun! Wonder how many times I can vote in an hour?
-
Obama's small ball on guns could be a big deal
By Chris Stirewalt (Fox News)
Published January 05, 2016
OBAMA’S SMALL BALL ON GUNS COULD BE A BIG DEAL
Is it possible that President Obama’s executive actions on gun control can be both inconsequential and of lasting significance? You bet.Friend and foe agree that the president’s move to nudge out the definition of a federally licensed firearms dealer doesn’t amount to much as it relates to curbing gun deaths.
Not only did the so-called “gun-show loophole” not play a role in any recent mass shootings, but anyone who was already habitually selling firearms at pawn shops, flea markets, or, yes, gun shows, is already licensed or already in violation of the law.
Leaning harder against those who sell firearms - what Attorney General Loretta Lynch deemed “a clarification” - will not do much, if anything, for what the president promised to do to “spare families the pain and the extraordinary loss” from gun violence.
So, in that way, Obama’s new actions are small beer. Much of his supposedly bold actions relate to directing federal agencies to do better at what they’re already doing. One wonders why he waited so long to think of that...
It’s easy to understand why the president would fancy up these measures as bold steps. For himself, Obama can certainly feel his presidency turning into that thin wisp of smoke from a snuffed candle. As with every year since Obama lost the House for his party in 2010, the president is promising to go it alone.
Obama is preparing to give his last State of the Union address and his longtime rival, Hillary Clinton, is getting ready to finally grasp control of the Democratic Party from him. Six weeks from now, the Obama presidency won’t even be a wisp. It will already be a nostalgia trip.
Aside from trying to show some vigor on an issue he has made a top drawer priority, Obama can also try to hem Clinton in on the subject of guns. She has veered quite a bit on the subject, which promises to be an electoral loser for Democrats this year, and by acting now, he can make her sign on the dotted line.
This is not all kabuki, though.
House Speaker Paul Ryan is doing more than blustering when he accuses the president of “subverting the legislative branch, and potentially overturning its will.”
Think of the president’s actions as a test case for a broader-still executive action on guns. If Obama’s more modest measures outlined today can survive the legal challenges that are sure to follow, he will have broadly redefined what the chief-executive’s role is in administering the Second Amendment.
The enumerated restrictions on the federal government in the Bill of Rights get special status. While courts may hold that the executive branch has broad discretion in enforcing environmental regulations, banking rules, or food safety, Mr. Madison’s addition to the charter has created a force-field around certain activities.
Regulate wetland usage, bank sales or raw milk and courts balance the general idea of individual freedoms against the good of the society. Trip into speech, religion, assembly, guns or other enumerated areas and the test changes.
That means courts have struck down, repeatedly, efforts by governments to restrict individuals’ abilities to own firearms. In other cases, courts have demanded at least legislative permission before restrictions have been imposed.
If Obama could win for himself and his successor broader power to regulate the sale of firearms for the executive alone he will have struck a small, but very significant blow in his bid for large-scale gun control. Obama ultimately wants the right to regulate firearms the same way he can regulate the environment, banks and food, and this could be the start.
The path to the kinds of confiscations that Obama has said might be necessary could run through a loophole just like this. -
+1 on the Perry suspenders. I like them because they hook onto my belt without having to sew buttons into all my pants. When I can support my belt (and the load it's carrying) my pants stay up just fine! Plus my belt feels much better when it's not pulled so tight.
Got some crazy patterns too. If you can't have fun wearing these you just can't have fun.
-
6
-
-
ATF is going to cause themselves more headaches... Can't wait for somebody who is considered 'in the business' of selling firearms because of the EO, being turned down for an FFL because they don't meet the ATF 'business' requirements.
All sorts of fun court cases coming down the time from this stupidity.
Hmmm, what would happen if every gun owner in the USofA suddenly decided to send an application to become an FFL? Sure, 99.999% of us would be denied but think of the "grid lock" and mess it would create. "But "O", we're just trying to be good citizens and comply with your EO."
Edit: Didn't see Mike's post first. I second his idea!
-
A part of me wishes they would just go ahead and cram full scale ban and confiscation down our throats. It would be the straw that broke the camels back, hundreds of thousands would die, and the country would be forever changed. But at least this festering boil would be lanced and could begin to heal. If it's coming I want it to come while my generation is the one still here to deal with it, so my children don't have too.
Sent from behind the anvilA sad but very true statement, Spots. I'm not sure the future generations will have the "intestinal fortitude" to stand up for their rights. The way to control the future is to train the youth (think Germany in the 1930's / Russia's history). They aren't interested in changing your and my generations; know they can't. If they can manage to control us for a while they can wait and let nature "solve" the problem.
Those of us who "resist" the "common sense" restrictions on gun rights proposed by the liberals are being demonized by the media, the public school curriculums are being "standardized" with liberal views, and the right to defend yourself is under constant attack at all levels of government. And more and more the sheeple are drinking the liberals' Kool-Aid. Remember the "Safe Communities, Safe Schools Act of 2013"? Nice warm and fuzzy name for a bill that raised the real possibility that a gun owner would become a felon if they left home for seven days and did not transfer all their guns to someone to hold. Of course the transfer (and the one back to you) would be through an FFL. Didn't go anywhere... this time. Who knows what's next.
-
To pull up an old phrase, "There ain't no such thing as a free lunch". Everything the manufacturer ships with the gun adds to the cost and is included to the price we see as the buyer.
Most people aren't TGO savvy buyers; they won't think about the number of magazines that are included when comparing prices. Just "I can get Gun A for $$ but Gun B will cost me $$$". Personally I like the option to chose what I use with my guns. But two mags would be nice! ;)
-
Hi neighbor! Welcome.
-
The Anti-Gun politicos will probably go into a frenzy after this:
Supreme Court justices reject challenge to local assault weapons ban
Published December 07, 2015
Associated Press
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from gun owners who challenged a Chicago suburb's ban on assault weapons.
The justices on Monday refused to hear the case of a Highland Park, Illinois, pediatrician who objected to the city's 2013 ban on semi-automatic weapons and large-capacity magazines.
The federal appeals court in Chicago upheld the Highland Park law, ruling that local governments have leeway in deciding how to regulate firearms.
In October, the federal appeals court in New York largely upheld similar laws in Connecticut and New York, among a handful of states that ban semi-automatic weapons.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly turned away challenges to gun restrictions since two landmark decisions that spelled out the right to a handgun to defend one's own home.
-
Sounds like a red herring to me. As one "famous" commentator often says "Follow the money..." That's what this is all about. Metro government (and the real-estate developers) want the $$$ that redevelopment of the fairgrounds will provide. Charging a substantial parking fee didn't discourage people. Allowing income producing activities to operate there isn't supporting this plan either. Plus they have financed expensive convention facilities that need paying activities to meet the bills.
If you don't like what Nashville is becoming spending your money outside "Metropolitan Nashville/Davidson County" is the most powerful protest you can make. I recall very well when Nashville had a total hold on retail. Remember when Church Street was the place? Then the malls, several of which are about ghost towns today or have been converted to office/medical facilities.
With the development of retail/restaurants/etc. in the surrounding counties Metro Nashville is no longer the 8,000 pound gorilla that they still see themselves to be.
-
3
-
-
Who says you have to be good.... to have fun!
-
Welcome from a guy with two Post Versalogs! Dates me doesn't it? Lots of techie geeks here. Makes for interesting conversations sometimes.
-
"We are not anti-religion," Henderson said. "We are anti-crazy nonsense done in the name of religion. There is a big difference. Our ideal is to scrutinize ideas and actions but ignore general labels."
When you look at it this way it's not really as nutty as they appear. But I still want a golden strainer with red, white and blue pinwheels on each side! Think that will work on my HCP renewal?? :devil:
-
From the IRS website:
The Affordable Care Act requires employers to report the cost of coverage under an employer-sponsored group health plan. Reporting the cost of health care coverage on the Form W-2 does not mean that the coverage is taxable. The value of the employer’s excludable contribution to health coverage continues to be excludable from an employee's income, and it is not taxable. This reporting is for informational purposes only and will provide employees useful and comparable consumer information on the cost of their health care coverage.
... and we are expected to think there's not a "plan". Make employers document it... add up the $$$... then tax it!
Oh, I forget it's only to "provide employees useful and comparable consumer information on the cost of their health care coverage". How can I be so suspicious??
-
10-Ring, I'm not being critical, looks like a good source of info, but I'd suggest some caution when using the TWRA maps. TWRA's overlay info may have something to do with how they define "Huntable Lands" instead of their actual property limits. Or it could just be sloppy work on the overlay.
I'm fairly familiar with the Cheatham County area and I see a lot of private property under TWRA's green shading. All the "square corners" and North, South, East, West "edges" are pretty good clues; property here was never surveyed by sections. Most property lines either follow a natural detail like a stream, etc. or, if they are straight, they're at some random alignment . It made sense to someone at the time but it's hard to understand today.
Also, I noticed the base photo changes as you zoom to different levels. They were taken at different times with, probably, several years in between, so things may have changed from one photo to another. Most likely more houses and development on the newer one.
-
Yeah, when I first saw it but not for long. I think it developed a case of lead poisoning. Had rooted up about 1/4 acre of my neighbor's yard. About 25 miles northwest of Nashville.
Do I need Bigger Tires?
in General Chat
Posted
Putting liners in the rear wheel wells will help "appearances". Wasn't happy with the looks of my F150 w/20's until I di it. They cover up the gaps under the bed and "black out" that area, knock down some water and junk, reduce the sound off the rear wheels a little and don't cost that much (a little over $100). Another one of those things that should be included for the price we pay for a truck these days.