Chucktshoes

With the trademark lawsuit, that’s going on, I wouldn’t expect to see a restock anytime soon. This ad was likely planned well in advance, and for whatever reason wasn’t changed in light of those development.

True about the PF9, but that really was the proof of concept of the micro-compacts that dominate the CC market these days. They did the same thing with the .380 pocket pistols of the generation before with the P3AT.

Considering the number of their guns that have gone on to be refined and produced by larger “more reputable” companies like Ruger and S&W, they’re basically an independent R&D skunkworks for the industry.

https://ky-leadernews.com/brayden-tyriq-lovan/ The obituary of the deceased. Since this is where the discussion of the topic has been, I figured this would be the place to put a face to it all. godspeed.

I’m starting to see where holster makers are making announcements that under the advisement of their insurance companies and lawyers that they are discontinuing holster production for the P320. SIG is backing themselves into a corner they probably didn’t anticipate. Their insistence on blaming everything else other than their gun is going to put it in a position of not having accessory support because nobody will want to take on the liability of doing so.

https://triblive.com/sports/mark-madden-hulk-hogan-always-stole-the-show-made-wrestling-a-true-phenomenon/ an excellent write up.

I don't think that Chrissy Boy is thinking this one through too well. If he is harping on "It was never adjusted for inflation!!!!!!" and then you do and people see how exorbitant it would be NOW, then you strengthen the argument that it was never about generating revenue and was instead meant to price out constitutionally protected activity, just like poll taxes were.... That is NOT going to do well in the courts.....

Some humor. And one that’s not funny at all

The internals of the P365 are very different than the P320. The P365 has a design that is much more akin to the design standards of other striker fired pistols. The 320 uses a different slide lock lever layout and a coil spring held in by a horizontal lateral pin where the 365 uses a wire like spring in the FCU chassis and the takedown lever arm to hold the slide lock lever in place and give it spring tension. The disconnector is in slightly different location on each and a different size and shape; same with the firing pin safety lever that pushes up on the firing pin safety plunger in the slide. The 320 FCU has a separate housing for the sear assembly whereas the 365 sear fits into the FCU chassis directly. The 320 FCU goes into the grip module then the take down lever is pushed through a hole in the grip module and FCU; the 365 has the take down lever in place in the FCU and the whole assembly is placed in the grip module as a complete unit. The P320 FCU is stamped sheet metal and the 365 FCU is a casting which is then finish machined The ejector on the P320 is just a bent over part of the stamped steel, the ejector on the P365 is part of the machined component.

Glockstore in Nashville has banned them from the premises entirely. Scott Jedlinski of Modern Samurai Project has banned them from classes. There is a tidal wave of ranges and instructors banning the 320.

You could not pay me to possess one.

https://www.twz.com/land/sig-m18-pistols-pulled-from-use-by-air-force-global-strike-command USAF spokesperson has confirmed the incident and that the airman died from his own pistol.

A couple of days ago, the USAF added another very tragic incident to that list. In response, they are pulling them from use by security forces, pending investigation and evaluation. https://www.warren.af.mil/News/Releases/Article/4251188/90th-missile-wing-confirms-on-base-airman-fatality/ I don’t think I can accurately describe how livid I am reading that. If it is accurate with regards to what happened, not only should all of their contracts be canceled, but they need to be investigated and everyone involved in covering up the design flaw that is so obvious with this firearm need to be held criminal liable.

The latter.

Does he know?

You are very welcome.I’m not an instructor or anything, I’m just a nerd with a hyper fixation on the legal issues and so manage to keep up-to-date out of nerdery.

https://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/Apps/GeneralAssembly/Publications.aspx if you click the link to view the public chapter enactments for 2025, on page 26 you will find public chapter 356. It describes how in 39–17 – 1351 the legal age for obtaining an enhanced handgun carry permit has been lowered from 21 to 18 with an effective date of 05/02/2025.

Your information is out of date. The legal age for obtaining an HCP is flatly at 18 now. since 2023 Tennessee has been under a court ruling that declared the 21 age limit as unconstitutional, and it was codified into law this year. The only hang up that someone between the ages of 18–20 has an exercising their right to carry a pistol in self-defense is federal law that still sets the age for purchase through an FFL at 21. They must have obtained their pistol through private sale or gift as of right now.

I’ve moved the listing and cleaned up the conversation in the thread. Please add a price to the listing to comply with the rules. Other than that, good luck with the sale.

The MSP provided additional pistols for testing beyond the one involved in the uncommanded discharge incident. The user nor the agency modified the triggers. They did previously go back to Sig for warranty work.