Fallguy

You mean people didn't grab their kids of the streets, scream "GUN!" and call 9-1-1 or shoot you just becuase they could see you were armed? Great story....thanks for sharing. I wouldn't seek out an argument, but just because I'm armed, I wouldn't let someone walk all over me either.

No....I simply copy and past the URL into the message and when I preview it, it has the video embeded in the message.

If I ever plan on being in the area I'll give you a shout.

You can always make me laugh strickj

Welcome

Welcome As others have said, if the gun is unloaded and the ammo seperate from it, no need to have a HCP to go to the range, but I would suggest getting anyway.

Sort of like because of all the..... pedophiles that break in because someone has one of those "honor student" stickers. ...or those that break in looking for fishing equipment because of the "I'd rather be fishing" sticker. break in looking for golf clubs because of the "I'd rather be golfing" sticker. break in looking for dead fetuses because of the "Pro-Choice" sticker. Has anyone ever posted where an actual criminal broke into a vehicle because of a sticker on it?

Great article, thanks for posting it.

Welcome

Replays of last nights episode Sun 11:00pm and Tue 10:00pm (Central) No DVR here but I did flip back and forth and caught a "Best of" her speech on FNC this morning.

I liked it too....will be watching every week.

T.C.A. 39-17-1310 Affirmative defense to carrying weapons on school property. It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under § 39-17-1309(a)-(d) that the person's behavior was in strict compliance with the requirements of one (1) of the following classifications: (4) A person entering the property for the sole purpose of delivering or picking up passengers and who does not remove, utilize or allow to be removed or utilized any weapon from the vehicle.

Welcome

IMO that is 100% legal, but IANAL. As long as the car is locked I don't even think the gun has to be in a safe. Also I see no need to seperate the gun and the ammo. Again IANAL

I think they mean the firearm has to be carried for an official purpose, not the person carrying it on the property for an offical purpose. But it really doesn't matter what either of us think, it would be up to the federal judge. Let us know how your argument works.

Sort of proving my point for me, huh? +1 It says "employee or agent of the owner" in addition to responsiable for protecting property and persons.

No argument from me!

Comes on every weekday 7:00am and 6:00pm (Central) on Encore Westerns channel. Website with lots of info and pics.. http://www.riflemanconnors.com/riflemanconnors_index_page.htm

Yep

Although no LEO would ever charge another with it....the law actually says "...in the discharge of their duties", not simply "on duty". I have always taken that to mean inside taking a report or responding to some type of call for assistance, not simply eating lunch.

Guess I'm way behind today...

+1

I think that goes back to yours showing canceled because of some computer or human input error and was not actually, or at least didn't go through the proper procedure, to be canceled.

Yes, If they actually revoke or suspend your HCP they will send you a letter saying you have 10 days to turn in your HCP.