GlockSpock

Open to offers.

Clearing out some things around the house as well as raising funds for Christmas. Included: 90mm M19 Shell (Stamped 1944, cut down to a "pencil/pen holder size") .50 Inert Round Mother's Polish (for making everything shiny) $130 Shipped OBO

No, it is relevant in my opinion. The ATF declared illegal the use of a shoestring to increase the rate of fire. https://www.everydaynodaysoff.com/2010/01/25/shoestring-machine-gun/ In a roundabout way, they did the same thing with bumpstocks. I am personally against both of these measures. The term ‘‘machinegun’’ means any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger. The term shall also include the frame or receiver of any such weapon, any part designed and intended solely and exclusively, or combination of parts de- signed and intended, for use in converting a weapon into a machinegun, and any combina- tion of parts from which a machinegun can be assembled if such parts are in the possession or under the control of a person. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2011-title26/pdf/USCODE-2011-title26-subtitleE-chap53.pdf In my observation and interpretation, a firearm with a bumpstockj attached does not fire more than one shot per function of the trigger. What you have is a trigger functioning very quickly. Sorry, but in my opinion it is clear. Letter vs spirit. They should be legal based on letter of the law. Don't like that? Change the law!

Does a bump-fire stock alter the firing mechanism to fire more than one shot per pull of the trigger? Because if it does, it's a machine-gun. If it doesn't...well:) I agree that it violates the spirit of the law. But if something doesn't violate the letter of the law, then in my opinion it is legal. But...then again...shoelaces are machine-guns too so who knows anymore.

And, in my opinion, I think more people than we care to admit would jump on board stricter private gun sales. Heck, the media has already done a really, really good job convincing a lot of people that private gun sales are already illegal intrastate. I've met so many friends and coworkers that are baffled by the fact I've bought and sold guns without going to a gun dealer.

No, you'd be anti-gun if you wanted/supported banning bump stocks. Just like I'm not anti-gun because I don't want to ban revolvers, although I own none.

Vetoed by Trump? Really? Lets see...Republican House? Check. Republican Senate? Check. Nobody "had" to do anything, but Trump volunteered the banning of bump stocks. Why? If it were to get passed the House and Senate, I think Trump would sign it in a heartbeat if he thought he'd gain a friend over it.

Price dropped to $1,500 net. That means $1,500 locally or + shipping and insurance. Would also consider some trades partially, such as Glock.

Pics added. Woot woot.

Price dropped to $1,500 net. That means $1,500 locally or + shipping and insurance. Would also consider some trades partially, such as Glock. It is this exact model. Great overall shape. As far as I can tell, everything still 100% fully functioning. Will arrive to you with MacOS Mojave freshly installed and ready to be setup by you. No iCloud Lock or Firmware Password 100% fully usable by you As shown in photos, small inflection on screen. Otherwise, metal and screen in superbly great shape. This computer is still powerful by today's standards and still fully capable and should last someone many more years. Included: 2016 MacBook Pro Original Charger & Original USB-C Cable $54.95 Value - Blue Lounge Sleeve (shows wear as seen in photos, could probably be cleaned by someone willing) $29.99 Value - SanDisk USB-C SD Card Reader $7.99 Value - Anker USB-C to USB-A Adapter $29.99 Value - i-BLASON Case I have, to the best of my ability, listed everything 100% as accurately as possible. Pictures override everything. Original box not included.

But she is in a safe space.

When I sold a Glock 19 Gen 4 w/ TFX Sights a few months ago, I had a hard time getting $450. Maybe I sold it for $425, I don’t remember. The market is down.

It was obviously the instructor’s fault to be in the situation in the first place, but I feel as if his actions during the flight did indeed save the man’s life. The mere fact the guy’s weight kept pulling the glider left was worrisome enough. Usually the harness seems to keep the weight centered on the thing.

I thought about posting this yesterday. Epic video.

You just bumped a five year old classifieds ad that sold five years ago?