leroy

Jay:_____________ I aint missing anything: Your arguement is that government needs to "regulate" to "break up". My solution is to "de-regulate". That's what Reagan did with the airlines in the 80's; so it can be done. I didn't miss a thing. leroy Late breaking news (...in case you had any doubt about what FCC "regulators" do...): Link here: http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=556103&p=2

I like it!! Great grips (...and sixgun....) Leroy

Jay:___________ I simply wont play the "...if you dont read, you dont know..." game with you. That position destroys my basic premise about not needing more regulation. That part of the discussion is over. As i previously stated; i simply dont care how ...."winsome and well intentioned the proposed regulations are...". We dont need 'em to begin with. You and I are having conversations from two polar opposite perspectives. I'll try to sort them out: Your perspective seems to be saying that "...i dont like regulation; but since we already have the regulatory system in place; why not do the "noble and alturistic thing" and promulgate regulations (...which, by the way, are the same as laws...) and "fix loopholes" with the internet that the "bad corporations" are taking advantage of. By the way, i have a problem with the concept of "bad corporations". How do we know when they are bad? Who is cloaked with the authority to pronounce them bad? When do they turn "bad" ?. The "bad" corporation thing seems suspiciously anti-capitalist to me; but im a suspicious man. The fact is that you are either a capitalist or you are not. I'll grant that capitalism has problems; but my solution is to let the market and the consumer sort them out; not the government. When the government sorts them out, that is a "managed economy"; a euphanism for socialism (...which is exactly what we have in many parts of out economic system today, by the way; a hold over from the "New Deal"; another euphanism for FDR's great american socialist experiment...). Remember this, what the government "gives today"; it can "take away tomorrow". The best solution is to not give them the authority to give at all. My perspective is "....we dont need any regulation to begin with....". Allowing the FCC to reach out and claim the regulation of the internet is, in fact, an expansion of government regulatory power and authority, and i dont like that. As my sainted old mom used to tell me as a child: "...what you dont start, you dont have to quit...". The fact is that we dont need more regulations; we need less. That being the case; i refuse to quibble about the "correctness and need" of such regulation. My position is that we dont need them to begin with. While im on the regulation subject; i think a history lesson is in order. Regulatory bodies purport to take "things" (...broadcast radio, tv, the power industry, wateways, railroads; for example...) and seize the authority thru legislation to "regulate" them for the "public good". This is an old time political tool to raise money in fees, implement policies that otherwise cannot be implemented thru the legislative process, and generally interfere in the business of individual businesses in the name of the "public good". We can quibble about the beginnings of these things; but the end is always the same. The bureaucrats make the "regulatory agency" bigger, reach farther from their original intent, and reflect the views of the political class thru the appointment of directors and heads of agencies. The result of this is never good; and i challenge you to point to one modern "regulatory authority" that is improving anything. The whole "regulatory" concept is one that makes the regulated entities either serfs or "protected species"; depending on the regulatory posture, and increases costs for the consumer. Dont be drug off into the woods by the idea that says that "regulatory authorities" do a good work for the citizen; they simply dont. That presumes that mankind (...polititians and bureaucrats...) are fair, well-meaning, alturistic beings that are, in fact, the "best and brightest" and as such, would never make a mistake or do anything wrong. To all that, i say a hearty "....Baloney...". It simply aint so, and casual observation will validate my libertarian cynicism. Never believe the malarkey that polititians and bureaucrats are the most ethical, honest, or the brightest among us; it simply aint so. We dont need more regulations; we need less. We dont need more bureaucrats; we need less. Leroy

Jay:___________ I dont need to "...read the regulation for myself...". and, by the way, "...i can understand the terms real well myself..." I dont need your (..or anyone else's...) "summary assessment" of rules for complete comprehension of this malarkey. If you are against regulation; that means you are against regulation. We've got too many regulations now. No proposed regulation,"...no matter how winsome and and alleged to be upright..." suits me. If ya want regulation; vote for it. I aint goin to do that. I'm sure that the regulators will welcome you recommendation to accept the proposed new rules. I wont give mine. Remember, there will be another election in 2012; that means that there may be a shake up in the FCC. Leroy

Thanks David. I like the "Box o Truth" tutorial. Has anyone used synthetic motor oil (...5w - 20...) to lube the gas rings? I'm thinkin about using it (...been using regular synthetic gun oil, like the Educational Zone instructons say...) and using a synthetic grease (...like Slip2000...) for the bolt lugs and bolt carrier sliding surfaces. The thought is to keep the lube where it belongs and keep it on there longer with the grease. The thought with the synthetic motor oil is to simply try it out; there aint a harsher enviornment for oil than the rings and cylinder walls on an internal combustion engine. Whadda ya think? Leroy

Alpha:___________ Dwarren's answer(s) are right on target. Been reloading for about 45 years now. I'll add a few things about safety: Some folks worry about storing powder in your home or outbuildings. Smokeless powder is classified as a "flammable solid'. Handle it just like you would a 5 gallon can of gasoline. Check this out for details: Alliant Powder - Storage & Handling Primers are the most "dangerous" thing you will handle. Be careful with them, they will go off, and they can hurt you (...loose an eye or cripple a hand...). The bottom line of the "primer thing" is to be an adult and handle them carefully, dont "force" them into a primer pocket, keep primers fully identified and in their original packaging, and store them where they cant fall off the shelf and detonate. Check this out for details: Primers, the Sparkplug of Centerfire Cartridges The answer on "saving" is simple. You can save about "half" on reloading most cartridges. We load big bore pistol and shoot lots of it. Almost all with "hard cast" lead semi wadcutter bullets. If you shoot 9 mm or 223 (...556 military...), you wont save too much. There are lots of good deals on military type ammo out there. If you want the "best" ammo for long range shooting or target work, reloaded ammo is the "best"; as it can be "tailored" to individual firearms. Again, as Dwarren said, reloading is a great hobby; and his observations on "mentoring" are a great idea. The guys here on TGO are a great resource for help. Dont be bashful about asking questions. Have fun, Leroy

Ya did good!! It looks great. Regards, Leroy

Ya did good!! This is a very worthy cause and is exactly what Christmas is all about. Keep up the good work! Leroy

Dear folks:____________ Been thinkin about doing a lightweight flattop AR upper. What barrel and free float handguard would you all use? Thanks in advance. Leroy

Thought about this myself a couple of days ago. It is a very sobering and sad look back into our history. Thanks for reminding us. Regards, Leroy

Jay:___________ I dont believe for a moment that any regulation, no matter how winsome and alleged to be upright is appropriate for communication and opinion. The FCC is, in fact, a government regulatory agency. The emphasis is on "regulatory"--- without anything to regulate, there is no need for more "regulators". More than that, the net doesnt need "regulation". Regulation in the communications industry is a cash cow for the government and a chance to meddle in the affairs of "government regulated monopolies" by ultimately controlling content and service. We can quibble about whether we need "government regulated monopolies"; but that's a side issue . By the way, i worked for a "regulated monopoly"; the electric utility industry for thirty eight years. That gives a bit of insight into the "benefits" of regulation and the "calling in of favors" to regulators. I will grant that we can quibble about the "benefits" of the "technical" portion of this regulation; but i believe that's a side issue too. An issue designed to drag folks off into the bushes with a "red herring" issue that some folks will applaud. I believe the real issue is the issue of "regulating content", "regulating speech", and demanding "equal time for opposing views" just like the FCC (...and many polititians...) would like to see with the radio and video broadcast industry. The "technical improvements" are simply a bone to be thrown to the foolish. The "regulated monopoly" thing is a red herring in itself, but we are saddled with it. I see on no problem with both the telephone and cable industry being "regulated" thru the mechanism of the free market; but they wont be because the government already has their hooks into these industries thru the "regulated monopoly" doctrine for the "public good" (...which, by the way, i find laughable; it sounds like the old soviet "collective good" to me, and it benefits the government thru fees for regulation and largess to pass out to politicos who sit on government regulatory boards...). The only "public good" that i can see from this is that the politicos get a job and the government gets to collect fees. The real looser in this deal is you and me, the average citizen. The fact is, this whole move is 'red meat' move calculated to stir up Nobama's base with a move toward regulating speech. I predict that if left alone, the courts will do it in anyway; because the effect of some of the regulation will be to stifle political speech and thus nullify the First Amendment; my guess is that wont happen. The real test for the "political class" is to oppose this idiotic move. I frmly believe that the folks in this country are watching those who survived the election of 2010 very closely. I do not believe that any politico's survival of the election of 2010 or the one coming up in 2012 is a validation of the continuation of "business as usual" in Washington. I believe that they will be voted out if they dont oppose increased regulation (...and that's what this is, along with the long term goal of regulating political speech, which some politicos on both sides of the aisle (...read that incumbents...) like...), they will be seen as part of the problem rather than a part of the solution and thrown out; and that's ok with me. You may like the old ways of "regulating for the public good", i dont; and i think that lots of other folks dont like 'em either. Leroy

I understand; but i believe this one will get lots of traction in the next congress. It will probably be an issue of "doing the right thing for the wrong reason". The politicos well know that everyone is watching them and waiting for them to start dismantling everything that Nobama has (...and wants to...) do. This will be a good place to start; because the internet doesn't need regulating, and they well know it. Ray Charles (...if he was still down here upon the earth among us...) can see that this is a move to bring internet news media under government control under the guise of "making things fair". You, me, and others know that is 'baloney" and so do lots of other folks. I see this as a test for the polititians that survived the 2010 campaign. If they do the wrong thing, they will be out; and i like that. The political class should be mindful and even afraid of the voter. Let's keep watching and not loose heart, this one ought to be interesting. Keep up the good work! Leroy

I know. Sometimes i just aint quick enough! It's one of the problems with old age. Leroy

Thanks Raoul. They must do a great job with the machining. Now all i need to do is find a "...lightly used and lovingly cared for..." PM9 and i'll be in business!! Many thnks, Leroy

All:______________ Take a look at this from PC Magazine: Link here: FCC Broadband Plan Prompts GOP, Industry Backlash | News & Opinion | PCMag.com I suspect the fireworks are just about to start. I seem to remember both the FCC and other "Bureaus" being slapped by congress when they tried these shennagians in times passed. Leroy

All:_____________ When you use grease on the bolt and carrier; do you grease the sliding surfaces AND the bolt lugs? Do you use a couple of drops of oil on the gas rings? Leroy

Thanks Mike. Leroy

Mike and David:_______ RE: This for home use. What barrel length? What flash suppressor? What round? Thanks, Leroy

I like 'em!! They look good. Good thinkin!! Keep up the good work! Leroy PS-- I like the shotgun too. Keep it under your overcoat? ! ---HEHEHE Looks like a real handy tool!

David and all our Kahr toting brothers and sisters:______________ I (...like all of you...) like the "little" kahrs. I think they are the ultimate pocket pistol to date. In regards to the "break in". What is your collective opinion about the break in? Do the kahrs need the "rough edges" worn off; or are they built so tight that they need to be loosened up? What da ya think? Leroy PS-- David; I really like tha kahr. I'm waiting to find a "lightly used, lovingly cared for" oney myself!

My guess is that the FCC is about to take a whooping after the first of the year. Lots of times in the past, the way the congress handled rogue bureaus in the executive branch was by having endless hearings, berating the top brass, and de-funding them in a loud, public way. They can do all that in the House now ---HEHEHE. My guess is that the Tea Party and Libertarians are watching this one pretty closely. I think the fun is just about to begin. I'm sure some Republican polititians are for this malarkey too; but it's dangerous to be "for" this type regulation now. Sadly, for these bureaucrats and sorry polititians, there will be another election in 2012. This should be fun to watch. Leroy (...watching...)

My glock 33 in a left hand allen miller pocket holster. Ugly but indespensable. Extremely accurate and reliable. All this from an old time smith revolver and colt government model snob!! Leroy

This is a great thing!! Just exactly the club i was thinkin about! On a less delightful note; i, like you, are interested in the interpretation. The damn hospital and doctors wont let me go "really armed" when i go see 'em (...im having to do that more and more; sadly...). I'm interested in keeping the yahoos from taking my baby aspirin (...and money --- what little there is...) from me in the parking garage. I see the ASP or sap as a great way to do that. I'm interested in the report from the "baton training" myself. FWIW; and old buddy of mine who is a reserve policeman said "dont worry about it". Just carry it and go about your business (...and ive done that from time to time; but i live in Knox county; they are pretty ignorant down there...). Keep up the good work! Leroy

Barry:________________ Thanks for the kind words. They are much appreciated. I believe as you do (....and as many others here do....) that real people have to take back the political discourse. RE: LBJ --- LBJ was one of the most delightful, windsome, and rascally political personalities in modern times. You couldn't help but love his style and antics no matter the political persuasion. I was about 21 years old when LBJ made the speech that i referenced. Any student of modern history (...or oratory...) should take the time to go to Youtube and watch some of LBJ's speeches (...if they are there...). RE: Beck. I see Beck just like you do. He is an "over the top" guy; and that tends to stir things up. I think Fox needs to team Beck up with Geert Wilders from the Netherlands; they would really have some incenderary stuff then!! I love Wilders; he is a great Dutchman. Keep up the good work. Leroy

Mosinon is exactly right. The truth is always the truth. The howling about Assange's character is just that; "...howling...". It's a desperate attempt to take the public's focus off the content of the messages and focus on discrediting the messenger. Dont allow yourself to be dragged of into the bushes about Assange's character; that aint the problem here, and those doing the howling well know that. If folks want to be mad about all this, the anger should be directed toward the overbearing insiders who are doing the wrong thing and being embarrased by all this, and the system that allowed a gay PFC to download it. How's that for '...dont ask -- dont tell?... . For additional reading on this subject; i would recommend this article by my genius heartthrob Ann Coulter's article at Townhall. Link here: Bradley Manning: Poster Boy for 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' - Ann Coulter - Townhall Conservative Highly recommended. Great read. leroy