E4 No More

Gee, I thought criminal records were already checked during background checks? Did I miss something?

You're right. I should have said, "Then you would be part of the 60%...."My apology.

Because you are part of the 60% of elegible voters who don't vote and thus stick us with the likes of Carter, Clinton, and Obama, and then complain about it.

He influences a butt-load of them.

I don't believe that it did, but that's about the time Florida went concealed carry and all, so no idea what impact if any.

Preaching to the choir guy. Just pointing out that extremely "Conservative" people are moving their views on the subject.

I got news for ya'll, Bill Krystal of the "Conservative" Daily Standard was on FOX this past weekend and called for reasonable restrictions on such things as high-capacity semi-automatic weapons and magazines. Many people are getting fed-up with massive shootings, and they are compromising already.

I got rid of my M&P 9C because the mag kept popping out in the holster. S&W was great by sending me a new mag release assembly without question, (and a second mag extender w/o charge I might add), but the problem still existed.

Without exertion you need 2 liters of water a day to replace loss. More in the summer heat or heavy exertion That can be from drink or what's in your food. Alcohol binds to water, so it more if you are consuming alcohol.

Duh!!

Yeah, it kind of all sums up with "relevance." They want to stay relevant in other words. Really kind of sad, IMHO.

Al & Jesse flock to stuff like this for one reason: MONEY!

So does he have some kin to run against Alexander should he decide not to retire?

And many of the innocent can't afford to fight the charge so they plead-out. We have a legal system; not a justice system.

I don't care what his motives are, if it goes to the soldiers I'm all for it: however, I would have liked to have seen it go to the Wounded Warrior Project.

I was talking about the presumption of innocence. In the back of the average person's mind the person wouldn't be there if they were innocent. Look at how many people on this forum alone jump to conclusions based on "news" reports.\ Also, keep in mind that one of the reasons that I got fed-up with law enforcement was watching corrupt courts. My own judge, for instance, did things like represent his own client in his own court. I've seen corruption in Nashville's courts too. Smyrna as well.

Having been a LEO what you think is not what actually goes on these days. Look at how many folks convict based on the news. In lesser courts the judges are simply revenue collectors.

Presumption of innocence is a fallacy. In today's society it no longer exists.

Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah! Reality sucks man!

Perhaps motormouth would be a better description. Just keep running your mouth spouting whatever comes to mind in a rapid manner so the opponent can't get a word in edgewise. O'Reilly flat called the guy a liar - which was incredibly funny - but that just derailed the conversation further rather than the guy proving what he said was true.

Have you noticed the the general approach to a Lib debate is to shout down the opponent? I watched Bill O'Reilly last night with a NAACP official, and that's all the dude did was try to shout O'Reilly down. They don't need to make sense, they just need to run their mouths constantly until their opponent gets tired of listening to it.

Armyveteran37214 REALLY needs to seek treatment for his OCD because judging by the content of his posts that's exactly what he has. No, it's not dissen because I have OCD too - just not this kind. RP lost; get over it! You either support the Communist In Charge or you support Romney...period!

So true! My middle kid told me after hearing Oblamo speak that her sole reason for supporting him was that he "...speaks to me." I retorted with, "And what did he say that spoke to you?" She couldn't say anything that he said that she agreed with. I asked her what she felt about various issues, and then pointed out how Oblamo believed in the opposite. It was striking when she came to the conclusion that she fell for his oratorical gifts rather than his positions.This is why Ron Paul has no chance. To the vast majority of people he looks like their crazy great-grandpappy who would die from the stress of office within a year. I think Rand Paul would have a better chance at winning than his father.

This^

Yes, some things never change. RE: Maggert, I agree. It's sad how many politicians will game the system to get their way rather than abide by the system of voting and letting the chips fall where they may.