I heard Rush's initial monologue on Fluke (Thursday & Friday of that week), and also the following Monday.
I agree, his assessment was on target. But, when I heard him analyze the hearing testimony, I did not hear him directly call her a sl*t. Rather, he inferred that 1. the costs seemed excessive, the frequency was absurd, and the natural perception by the public would be to regard these the actions of a sl*t. He also inferred that someone demanding contraception at taxpayer expense could be regarded as working for sex, i.e. the actions of a prostitute.
I don't recall exactly how he worded his Friday analysis, but do not seem to recall him pointedly saying "Fluke is a sl*t", but rather the actions and testimony were consistent with the behavior of one. He even wondered aloud "what her parents think" about her necessity for the amount of contraception and her asking the government to pay for it.
He even asked what the "return on investment" for the taxpayer would be.
He apologized over the weekend, and explained his apology on the following Monday. His reason for the apology was not a correction of facts, but that he had responded in a manner that would be normally deployed by his opposition. He "sank to their level" was the way he put it, and apologized for *that* reason.
Me, well, if it looks like a turd, smells like a turd, and squishes like one, it is not necessary to taste it in order to be certain. She is a shill.
Anyway, I bet her family is proud.