The Rabbi

OPSEC?

And via PM.

I was hoping to be the first.

Sounds good to me. Why wouldn't you?

Today was a busy day, thanks mostly to TGO members coming in (I love you guys). But the call of the day was worth sharing. ring ring. -Eastside. -Can I ask you a question? -Sure. -I have Smith & Wesson Sigma in .40. Does it take the same magazines as a Glock? -Uh, no. It takes Sigma magazines. They aren't interchangeable at all. -Thanks. At least he asked someone is all I can say.

.32 S&W topbreak. Great gun and surprisingly accurate. Probably 100 years old and still lethal. It was what I had around me at the time.

You're welcome. I'm a cheap date.

My wife didnt tell me the guy doing our gutters was coming this morning. So he nearly said hello to a S&W topbreak in .32S&W when he rang the bell. I had it discreetly in my pocket. But it was at hand.

More prosaic. I meant policies with regards to the Democratic primary process.

If you go to the User CP section there is a place to put people on "Ignore" so you cant see their posts anymore. I just did that. Encourage others to do the same.

And strangely Hillary's team largely shaped the policies that she is complaining about now.

Yes but by "helping" management you have made it impossible for everyone else who carries to go there. If you had kept your mouth shut it would still be possible. But no one ever said your judgment was terrific.

I dont understand how you can generalize from one rather unusual person to everybody. As for it being legal: it is legal to walk in N.Nashville or downtown Memphis at 2AM wearing a tuxedo with $100 bills sticking out of your pockets. But I wouldn't think much of someone who did that. Same thing here. I don't see any purpose to it beyond comfort and a lot of downsides.

Gee, you are veering off the cliff of irrelevant. So you aknowledge in this post that animal behavior isn't comparable to human behavior: But previously you posted that it was inherent in all animals: And here as well: So which is it? Do we learn the right of self defense from animals or not? And if animals exhibit a "right of self defense" then what are they defending against, since you say they do not murder or steal or rape? Then you assert: .But they dont. In countries on the continent I think there is no recognized right of self defense. There is strict liability for acts. If you kill someone, you go to jail. The reason is irrelevant. In America we follow English Common Law and that accorded a right of self defense. But you won't find the same concept in other cultures. It is cultural provincialism of the highest caliber to suggest that ours is the only right or normative one. And btw your list of "absolute wrongs" is also culturally determined.

I thought people on this site were in favor of liberalizing legal carry. Voldemort seems intent on restricting it. I don't understand the purpose of that. Legal permit holders are the safest people in the state. Restricting them will not make areas safer--the very opposite. So it comes down to one of two things: Either he is pulling our legs and trying to get us riled up (and doing a fine job of it); Or he really is the scum-sucking second cousin to Jimmy Naifeh and needs to be banned post hast. I hope it's the first.

Not mine unfortunately. I heard it said about the .357SIG caliber. But it works here as well.

LE's are civilians too. Just saying. I had a customer who ordered one. I got to shoot it. It was OK I guess but looks like the answer to a question no one asked.

I would bet it is stuck in a closet somewhere or drawer in the box unloaded. Yeah, point and pull the trigger. Of course it helps to have one in the chamber too.

Wow, name calling and mere assertion. What a great substitute for a reasoned argument. So do Europeans have a natural right of self defense or not? How do you know?

How do you know they aren't/won't?

Best post on the subject so far. Yeah, Voldemort open carried and ended up fighting a court battle over it. So people who say "point to an example where something bad happened"--here it is. As for cowboy, just because someone wears baggy pants and dresses like a gangbanger doesnt necessarily mean he is. But excuse me if I decide to treat him like one. You make the choice, you live with the consequences. And Mark@Sea, thanks for recognizing the rightness of my views. Any time you want to know the Absolute Truth feel free to ask me.

Thank you! Really making friends and influencing people here I see.

So did Oswald.

Wow, your argumentation has actually gotten worse. So now you claim that "natural rights" come from observing animals? In that case rape, theft and murder would all be OK, since animals do that all the time. And you start off "to me". So does that mean to other people it is moral? Is morality simply every man his own opinion? And what does morality have to do with rights? What is a "fundamental right" as opposed to a plain right? Do you have a clue as to what you are posting? I get the feeling you are simply regurgitating stuff you've read and heard, without trying to synthesize any of it or make sense out of it. It sure isnt making any sense to me.

For some reason the fact that you are such a proponent of OC convinces me that it's a bad idea.