-
Posts
4,163 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
8 -
Feedback
100%
Content Type
Forums
Events
Store
Articles
Everything posted by Dustbuster
-
We now have a 300 Blackout discussion group
Dustbuster replied to Dolomite_supafly's topic in General Chat
I'm in w a grin! -
But u forgot the missing order: Benghazi no drones for you!
-
The highway men is correct w hank jt and hank being the collector of civil war stuff rugers and colts. If u ever bump into him he's fun to talk guns w and is a encyclopedia about guns and reloading ...
-
This pic speaks for itself, 10 points if u can name every one of these desperado and name which one is a renowned colt collector.
-
New York flags 278 gun owners as mentally unstable.
Dustbuster replied to The Legion's topic in 2A Legislation and Politics
All they did was make a list of all the divorcees that live in that state. Voila! -
I go to Shelby avenue electronics. Just don't buy from the guy in the green mask no warranties haggling welcome, if they ask u for a 9 mm hand them a open end wrench and they'll respect you. Great deals!
-
This is so non gun related but, i know there's some members that enjoy drone discussion. This came from a trade paper i was ingesting: FWIW: http://geospatial-solutions.com/five-new-faa-commercial-uav-exemptions-what-do-they-mean/ By Eric G In a major step towards allowing unmanned aerial systems (UAS, UAV, drones) to be used for commercial purposes in the United States, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) granted five exemptions to four companies this week, allowing commercial UAS operation with an extensive list of conditions and limitations. If you recall from previous articles such as this one, the FAA says it’s illegal to operate a UAS for commercial purposes in the United States. But, take a look at this article: FAA Says Commercial Drone Operations Are Illegal… Public Says So What? Then, when the FAA attempted an enforcement action against a person (Pirker) using a UAS for commercial purposes, an NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board) administrative law judge sided with the person, not the FAA. Clear as mud? Of course, the FAA appealed the NTSB opinion v. Pirker, and won. Click here to see the documents explaining the decision. Essentially, the NTSB ruled that a UAS is considered close enough to a manned aircraft that UAS fall under similar rules, and that the FAA is within its rights to apply the rules of careless or reckless operations to UAS as it does with manned aircraft. So, after some legal wrangling, the rules seem to be as the FAA has stated: no commercial UAS operations. However, under order from the Obama Administration, the FAA is working on developing rules to allow commercial UAS operation in the U.S. The deadline for those rules to be released is September 2015, but there is much speculation that this deadline will not be met. That said, the FAA is not waiting until September 2015. In June 2014, the FAA issued the first UAS commercial use CoA (Certificate of Waiver or Authorization) to BP (British Petroleum) to allow commercial use of a particular UAS for surveying roads, pipelines and equipment in Alaska. Then, in September 2014, the FAA issued CoAs to six aerial photo and video production companies in the film and television industry. It should be noted that each CoA includes an extensive list of conditions and limitations, which are not necessarily the same, but similar (more on that below). That brings us to yesterday, December 10, 2014. On that day, the FAA announced it has issued exemptions to four companies for commercial UAS operations: Trimble Navigation,VDOS Global LLC, Clayco, and Woolpert. Looking at these four companies, it’s interesting that three of them are service providers and one is a manufacturer of UAS: Trimble. One might assume that, since Trimble is a manufacturer of UAS, the FAA exemption might carry over to its customers. After checking in with several people on this, the exemption appears to be only for Trimble owned-and-operated UAS, not customers. However, it doesn’t appear that the operator must be a Trimble employee (as opposed to a contractor). In that case, Trimble, as a manufacturer, could potentially deploy hundreds (or thousands) of its UAS under this exemption and have contract pilots operating Trimble-owned UAS. The exemptions are valid until December 31, 2016 unless rescinded or superceded. Conditions and Limitations For each FAA exemption granted, there’s a long list of conditions and limitations for each grantee. You can read the detailed list of these at the bottom of each document issued to the specific company. Trimble VDOS Global LLC Clayco Woolpert #1, Woolpert #2 Although the conditions and limitations vary with each exemption issued, there are some common to all: UAS must operate below 400 feet above ground level. UAS must obey the speed limit (varies by UAS). UAS must be within VLOS (visual line of sight) at all times by pilot in command. All operations must have a second person, a VO (visual observer). Pilot in command must possess at least an FAA private pilot certificate (some exemptions require a commercial certificate) and a third-class airman medical certificate. There are many more conditions and limitations, but this gives you an idea of what is required. The Trimble exemption contains 35 such items, so before you get too excited, take a look at the complete list of conditions and limitations. It’s not a simple endeavor. On a positive note, the FAA is making an effort and making progress. For an agency that has a reputation of moving very slowly and methodically, this is near lightning speed.
-
clandestine santa..........PJ Santa Ranger Santa, and the beat goes on lol.....
-
primary is GTG
-
hell be the club leader, will buy dope from jesse, and will retain saul as his lawyer, wendy will be the club matriarch,watch
-
I understand a fair challenge, but sliding on snow at 75 mph on 2 slick boards w rocks on either side is: Fill in blank w adjective to describe lack of common sense and ______________
-
that ending was just smashing! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk, Hell yeah it ate my spelling!!! again!!
-
Nice build !!!!! Can't wait to see the finished product!
-
Chase screwed sopranos fans BigTime.... That ending was just crap.
-
A U.S. Citizen can't get into Canada if u have been charged w certain crimes.... I don't get why he wants to open the floodgate and let all of the fleas, ticks, killers and felonious rejects in....
-
There's a joke that was posted about Obama peeing in a gold urinal that ended up being Clintons saxophone ....
-
After finding out he peed in Clintons saxophone, Obama came to the music city so he could buy Clinton a new sax from a company called Gibson .....
-
Mounted up. Little tricky to get set, it's tight and stiff on the noveske forged upper. Def need to work w it, it's sitting on an ar pistol,
-
Well someone did try to put Chlorine in the gene pool.
Dustbuster replied to vontar's topic in General Chat
Hot women in pikachu outfits? -
I've got a Gibbz. There's no fa or dust door. The rail space taken by the DD is minimal,1 slot up front. I'm going to try it on a pistol first before I say anything and see how it runs.
-
Came in today. I think I have an ar pistol that may be its first victim !!!!
-
This ^^^^ I will thanks!
-
From a big co. First Id ever seen of this: 9 mm 115 gr Primer in backwards lol ......
-
Thats what she gets for allowing obama to pee in his saxophone!
-
What will your next gun be? Post a picture of it and why you want one
Dustbuster replied to MrBrian's topic in General Chat
Agh a strip joint gun where it sticks em and -------