Kelemvor

Passing gun control legislation isn't the worst thing a President can do. Perhaps she was more concerned with the aims of the other candidates.

It's almost as big as she is, lol. It's amazing what a muzzle brake can do for recoil, too.

Not age appropriate. Euphemism does not change meaning.

Jesus, I don't even know where to start on that article. Sounded like a damn woman spouting feelings...

Hot gas and powder on my arm and face?! I'll take two!

What if you have a gun mounted on the front of your car that is belt fed from the trunk?

+1

Cool, I need to get my wife a carry piece. I think it would be awesome to do "couples carry" or even "couples open carry".

Ask seller a question: Why are you such a b****?

Thank you Grammarnazi. I guess everyone lets one slip every now and them.

Yeah, I more or less agree with you. It was stupid for him to break the law when so much was at risk. It seemed early on in the thread that people were condemning him in line with the whole reefer madness garbage that was slung around back in the day. Once again, my opinion is, if it doesn't negatively affect your work or the people around you, it isn't wrong and shouldn't be illegal. Obviously, putting himself in the position to be blackmailed and discredited affects his work and people around him, so it is wrong.

Well, like I said, if it doesn't affect his job, or other people, then it's fine. If it were legal, it would likely not do either. There's also no reason to be suspicious of him being under the influence of marijuana while working anymore than there would be suspicion of him being under the influence of alcohol or prescription narcotics which are both legal, yet just as dangerous if not more dangerous if misused. You can say, well he broke the law, so what's to keep him from breaking other laws, but that doesn't really hold any water. By that logic, you could say, "nearly everyone speeds, so what is to keep us from committing other crimes." Disregard of laws that you think are unjust doesn't necessarily make you an unethical person. Would you guys talk about me like I was some kind of lowlife if I put a pistol upper on my AR-15 rifle lower and got annihilated by the ATF? Probably not. None of you see anything ethically wrong with having an SBR, it's just illegal. Many people feel this way about illegal drugs. Also, to clarify, I don't have a pistol upper for an AR and I would NEVER put one on my lower. I don't want to lose everything I have worked for my whole life.

Do you guys realize how many people with Ph.D's use marijuana? A large percentage of them do and the effects of light recreational use on brain function is infinitesimally small. I'm not into it personally, but what someone does outside of their profession is their own business so long as it doesn't effect other people or their work.

Surely you don't think that test could simulate any situation outside of an ATF raid or the like. Real BG's don't have range time, aren't military or LEO's, and they don't expect a guy to come out of a room prepared to shoot them. It would be fun to try though.

My house is small enough that I could tell in seconds how many people there are and which rooms they're in. I am going to shoot them with, my wife is going to stay in the bedroom with whichever gun I don't bring.

I'm going to have to agree with TwoLane, while any gun can kill someone, the 5.7 has never been shown to be a superior round aside from armor penetration with the AP rounds. The FiveSeven is overpriced as well as the ammo, which is just a weaker version of the .221 Fireball. I might get one someday, but it's very far down on my list and it is by no means magical like so many people think.

I'm curious to see what you guys think about this: U.S. history textbooks could soon be flavored heavily with Texas conservatism - Yahoo! News

I sold all my guns after reading some Brady Campaign literature. So no problem for me.

Looks like a GSG9, Saiga12, ar, ar, ar chambered in something larger than .223, and an SKS. Evil collection.

In defense of the people who said Tom Slick is on drugs, they have a point (even if they are garbage.) He is pretty mentally unbalanced if you've seen video of him outside of this particular instance. However, Captain Ambalamps definitely deserved his leakage.

Warning: Prepare for thread derail.

You mean, that thing that goes up?

No offense Will, but you seem to have a lot of paranoia about your stuff being stolen and too much faith in your ability to stop intruders with your 5-shot .38spl. I can understand you being paranoid about your guns being stolen, but it would typically follow that you would also be paranoid about being attacked. I could also see you being relaxed enough to only really want a small revolver to defend yourself, but then it would follow that you wouldn't really be all that concerned about your guns being stolen either. Everyone has their own opinions about home defense, but I am inclined to want to place myself at an unfair advantage. I want to have the better weapon, training, and situational awareness if and when my house is invaded. If there are 2 or more BG's I want to have enough rounds to sufficiently neutralize all of them and have more rounds in the magazine if anyone else shows up. I also want to be able to reload quickly if necessary. A revolver does not do that for me. That's my take on it. I hope it's never put to the test.

Is that a can on it?

I did a trigger job on my AK pistol and I can shoot it offhand, 1/4 MOA, at 100yds all day long. P.S. ...with Wolf ammo.