EMTRN

3.18 in Somerville.

Ha Ha Ha

People watch too much TV.

That's awesome!

It's overkill until an attempt happens and then it would be,"the secret service just did not do enough."

I'll register it with my Dept.

Ask her to register it for you.

If you guys are ever in Phoenix, you should drop by Wilderness Tactical. My brother lives there, and I went in March for his wedding. The Wilderness staff are really nice people. I bought a belt, and they fitted me and made it right there on the spot. They also sell a bunch of other things like AR accessories and some surefire, and magpull products. I spent way too much money.

http://www.elite-tactical.com/aow.html

It appears that it was not a transfer, but a new ownership that would require registration.

By their reasoning, if I put my glock under a towel, it is an AOW.

Yea, I don't think it makes a lot of sense either. I really would not see the sense in paying 200 dollars to own a wallet pistol.

http://www.naaminis.com/faqgeneral.html That is the link to the NAA website that explains it's classification as an AOW. The ATF site is running very slow, when I get it to work I will cite the ruling.

It is an ATF ruling, I'll find it.

The type of wallet holster that is illegal, is the one where you can fire the weapon without removing it from the holster. Plain old wallet/ pocket holsters are fine.

See, we can play well with others!

Mine is a Beltman with the 7 holes. It is much more adjustable for a better fit than the traditional 5 hole belts.

I wish it was amazing, it's really pretty boring most of the time.

The best answer is, DON'T SPEED! That way neither one of us has to think about this little problem.

Cuz we are at work while you are at home on Sunday!

The passenger in the case presented will almost never come into play. I can't see any reason why your name would even come up. An unloaded gun, out of your reach, ammo separate, is not anything I would worry about.

It looks like the two felony charges, perjury and assault, were dropped. I can't find any new info on the misdemeanor weapons charge.

I need to find an update. They have dropped several of the original charges. I cannot believe they are trying to challenge LEOSA. I guess some DA is trying to make a name for himself. I think the officer made some poor decisions to get to this point, but I was not there and I hate to Monday-morning quarterback.

http://www.glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=916472 http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2008/08/29/news/local/doc48b784e086e0d898298826.txt I started this in response to Fallguy's questions in another thread. Interesting case in South Dakota.

There was an incident with a Police officer from Washington state who, during the Sturgis bike rally, used his weapon in self-defense and shot a hell's angel. The DA in South Dakota is challenging the legality of LEOSA, claiming it was never implemented on the Federal level, and has charged the officer with unlawfully carrying a concealed weapon. I will find more and post it.