chances R

And this is not a time to panic and fear the 'sky is falling'. The voting booth is our friend, please do so. Also this shows a strengthening in the aftermath of the shooting, which is a much stronger force than the typical call for more gun control. As many have said in the past, THEY want all of our guns. This most recent assualt is on LONG guns. I don't believe the shooter fired a shot from his handgun. It will just as easily carry over to shotguns IMO. I believe many of the unfortunate victims would have no problem choosing a weapon over popcorn the next time they go out. Laws are and were ineffective; always been that way. Many want to eliminate the ballistic clothing, teargas, 'black' movies, guns, more signs, more security........We must think and react rationally. But, unfortunately, there is no way to make everyone safe......just look at the world around us and take responsibility for your own safety.

This is why all elections are important, especially Congress. Turn out to vote and get all your friends and family to do likewise.

I have a R1 and have shot at least 3000 rds through it. Great gun, especially for the price. I have had only 1 FTF with RN. Two 4 day classes @ 600 rds each with only that one issue. It is my go to gun for things that go bump in the night. BUT, great choice on the Sig. I bought one recently and it is sweet. Several hundred rounds through it and the accurracy is fantanstic. For the money the Sig is the best value out there IMO.....

I don't know my reaction, I know I do think about similar situations and plans. Staying 'yellow' is step one. I think I have really made that decision already, otherwise there would be no use in carrying.

Several comments 1. Evil has been present since Cain v Abel. Always will be that way. If man does not care to violate God's law, thou shall not kill, then why would he care to violate man's law? Laws are ineffective in this case...just like the gun-buster sign. 2. Many throughout the media and public call-in actually condemned any HCP intervention, worried about cross-fire etc. I don't think it could have been much worse. The shooter, IMO, was playing a video game in his mind. If the game shot back, I think it would have been different. Maybe not by one HCP, but what if there had been 3 - 4 HCP present? 3. The media gives no acknowledgment that many civilians have had considerably more firearms training than a lot of LEO. Not speaking of crisis intervention, in general, but simply firearms. 4. Whether the level of training of a HCP is satisfactory or not, each person has the right to chose whether to arm and protect themselves. In retrospect, it would be interesting how many in that theater would have preferred to have a weapon available.

Don't worry......if you can't pass the shooting exam you wouldn't have made it to the right place to take the test.

Agreed....but the media won't portray it that way.

The best helicopter view the news gave looks more like W.Virginia plates than TN plates......but doesn't really matter.

I'm 58, and TMF and Dave both said it best for me. At least having the perogative to carry in this State and for the most part, in this country, gives us the option to react as each of us sees fit at the time.

I agree with that 100%. Didn't judge you, but I am surprised many could stand by and watch such an attack, and do nothing. I will also add that this situation is totally different from robbery, etc. especially if it's not my stuff, where for the most part, it is either money or property that is stolen. No big deal, no bodily harm, maybe a little bruising of the ego, etc. and in such a case, my weapon stays holstered.

If I were to be judged by my peers, in this situation, I was hoping that most of them would be from this TGO forum. Guess I am mistaken. It would be interesting to see how this breaks down by age. Very similar situation in stopping to render aid at an auto accident. Many people say 'no' because of fear of liability. Other situations are out there, I'm sure. But to me, if someone is clearly being attacked, and in this situation stabbed----repeatedly---- well I've stated my reaction. My moral conviction is much more important to me than any possible legal ramification of my actions.

Seems as though you are going through a lot of steps for someone that lives in the combat zone of Memphis...

So Caster, you really believe that a cop is always there when you need them? A house is on fire and someone is inside......just wait for the fire dept, they are paid to get the people out? I guess none of us really need our guns or fire extinguishers. Yeah, I know it sucks....the legal crap....but then again by doing the right thing at the right time I can live with myself. You MIGHT get arrested, but it's doubtful given the circumstances as presented by the OP.

Sure, just look around at other 'societies' where there is more evil than good. Many of the African nations who have wallowed in stagnation for lack of development.......every man for themselves mentality. I would say it is the same in the Middle East. Read any American History? This country was built on helping each other in times of need and why this is still the best place on earth......for the time being. So yes I can see drv31st point.

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." , Edmund Burke My 'wiring' would not let me just stand there and not intervene. Yes, call 911, but then something must be done to save someone's life. I might try and pull the women through the opposite side of the car, but the attack would be stopped, using deadly force if necessary. I couldn't live with myself otherwise. I hope no one finds themselves in this position, or one of their loved ones being victimized and find out someone there had the power to stop the attack and didn't.

tough choice........offer enough 'boot' and get both....problem solved

The last gun I ordered, shipping free, extra mag and holster included. Local transfer $15. (taxes not included)

Nothing wrong with supporting your local gun shop.......but 'rarely' can I buy cheaper locally.

yep, saw the episode. ammo is not a concern.

TMF....got to ask, were you on active duty at the time of the mandatory training session? My point being, if so, is IMO, this is a perfect example of socialized medicine. Making a requirement for the 'subjects'. Who knows where the obamacare mandates will end?

First, according to statistics provided by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, there is an interesting correlation between accidental deaths caused by guns and those caused by doctors. Doctors: (A) There are 700,000 physicians in the U.S. ( Accidental deaths caused by physicians total 120,000 per year. © Accidental death percentage per physician is 0.171. Guns: (A) There are 80 million gun owners in the U.S. ( There are 1,500 accidental gun deaths per year, all age groups. © The percentage of accidental deaths per gun owner is 0.0000188. Statistically, then, doctors are 9,000 times more dangerous to the public health than gun owners are. old data, but I bet it hasn't changed much.

obviously junk..........or a well kept secret.....

Charles Krauthammer's view.........hope he is right: June 28, 2012 To all my friends, particularly those conservatives who are despondent over the searing betrayal by Chief Justice John Roberts and the pending demise of our beloved country, I offer this perspective to convey some profound hope and evidence of the Almighty’s hand in the affairs of men in relation to the Supreme Court’s decision on Obamacare. I initially thought we had cause for despondency when I only heard the results of the decision and not the reason or the make-up of the sides. I have now read a large portion of the decision and I believe that it was precisely the result that Scalia, Alito, Thomas, Roberts and even Kennedy wanted and not a defeat for conservatism or the rule of law. I believe the conservatives on the court have run circles around the liberals and demonstrated that the libs are patently unqualified to be on the Supreme Court. Let me explain. First let me assure you that John Roberts is a conservative and he is not dumb, mentally unstable, diabolical, a turncoat, a Souter or even just trying to be too nice. He is a genius along with the members of the Court in the dissent. The more of the decision I read the more remarkable it became. It is not obvious and it requires a passable understanding of Constitutional law but if it is explained anyone can see the beauty of it. The decision was going to be a 5-4 decision no matter what, so the allegation that the decision was a partisan political decision was going to be made by the losing side and their supporters. If the bill was struck down completely with Roberts on the other side there would have been a national and media backlash against conservatives and probably strong motivation for Obama supporters to come out and vote in November. With today’s decision that dynamic is reversed and there is a groundswell of support for Romney and Republicans, even for people who were formerly lukewarm toward Romney before today, additionally Romney raised more than 3 million dollars today. Next, merely striking the law without the support of Democrats and libs would have left the fight over the commerce clause and the “necessary and proper “ clause and the federal government’s role in general festering and heading the wrong way as it has since 1942. As a result of the decision the libs are saying great things about Roberts; how wise, fair and reasonable he is. They would never have said that without this decision even after the Arizona immigration decision on Monday. In the future when Roberts rules conservatively it will be harder for the left and the media to complain about the Robert’s Court’s fairness. That’s why he as Chief Justice went to the other side for this decision not Scalia, Alito, Thomas or Kennedy, all of whom I believe would have been willing to do it. Next let’s look at the decision itself. Thankfully Roberts got to write it as Chief Justice and it is a masterpiece. (As I write this the libs don’t even know what has happened they just think Roberts is great and that they won and we are all going to have free, unlimited healthcare services and we are all going to live happily ever after.) He first emphatically states that Obamacare is unconstitutional under the Commerce Clause saying you cannot make people buy stuff. Then he emphatically states that it is unconstitutional under the “necessary and proper†clause which only applies to “enumerated powers†in the US Constitution. Justices Ginsberg, Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan all went along with these statements. They never would have gone along with that sentiment if that was the basis for striking the law in total. This is huge because this means that the Court ruled 9-0 that Obamacare was unconstitutional under the Commerce clause which was Obama’s whole defense of the bill. They also ruled 9-0 on the “necessary and proper†clause. Even better both of these rulings were unnecessary to the decision so it is gravy that we got the libs to concede this and it will make it easier to pare away at both theories in the future, which we must do. Well done. Roberts, through very tortured reasoning, goes on to find that the taxing law provides the Constitutionality for the law. Virtually everyone agrees that the Federal government has the power to do this as it does with the mortgage deduction for federal income taxes. This too is huge because Obama assiduously avoided using the term “tax†and now he has to admit this law is a tax and it is on everyone even the poor. That will hurt him hugely in the polls and will help Romney. More importantly though is the fact that this makes this a budgetary issue that can be voted on in the Senate by a mere majority instead of 60 votes needed to stop a filibuster. That means that if the Republicans can gain a majority in the Senate, it can vote to repeal Obamacare in total. Finally the Court voted 7-2 to strike down the punitive rules that take away money from states that do not expand Medicare as required in Obamacare. This too is huge because we got Kagan and Breyer to join this decision and it can easily be applied to many other cases of extortion the Federal government uses to force states to do things they don’t want to. This is also amazing because Obamacare has no severability clause so by striking the Medicaid mandate portion as unconstitutional the whole bill should have been struck. If that happened none of these other benefits would have been accomplished. I haven’t read far enough to know how he did it but I am sure it is brilliant. So to recap the Roberts court through a brilliant tactical maneuver has: strengthened the limitations of the commerce clause and the necessary and proper clause by a unanimous decision, made Obama raise taxes on the poor and middle classes, converted Obamacare into a tax program repealable with 51 votes in the Senate, enhanced Romney’s and Republican’s fundraising and likelihood of being elected in November, weakened federal extortion and got the left to love Roberts and sing his praises all without anyone even noticing. Even Obama is now espousing the rule of law just 2 weeks after violating it with his deportation executive order. That is why I have decided this was a genius decision and that I did in fact get a great birthday present today not to mention U. S. Attorney General Eric Holder being held in contempt. What a day.

Anybody use these routinely? Seems overall quite a bit cheaper than the others. Any thoughts?

Ezoxx is suppose to be one of the best 'clean' products (vs. cosmoline) then put in a gun sock.