GlockSpock

  The author of the page thinks it is a great idea to create huge oversize .jpg images and then downscale them to fit on the page. Clicking on the image will bring up the larger part of the page.   On one hand, it is very thought provoking stuff. On the other hand, it would be very easy to take any modern event (tragedy), find who the victim/s were, look into their personal life, find a photo of them and claim that they are someone else and the photo is from after the tragedy.    There are a few things that seem undeniably off, such as the Robbie Parker interview. At "best" it is the fact that in certain "tragedies" the media/government hires actors to influence the story. At "worst" it's a full blown conspiracy on the level of a James Bond novel or the like. I feel the truth probably falls between the two of those somewhere.

http://wellaware1.com/fairfield.htm   That pretty much sums up the conspiracy. Note some of their other conspiracies. 

  That may be the case. I don't know what you saw, but it is also very likely that a lot of people are purchasing these splurge "insurance" purchases on credit.

http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/topic/57868-lordie-alex-jonespiers-morgan-on-guns/   :up:

http://whoismyrepresentative.com/   Shows you Senators and Representatives

There it is @KCambell. He got the same letter as me. There are either a few variations sent out, or different lists based upon what you specified in your letter to him. 

Well I suppose that it is possible that some politicians still personally reply (or have an intern do so), but I also suspect that perhaps you and I just got put on two different lists? I may have gotten put on the 2nd Amendment/Sandy Hook list, and you may have just gotten put on the 2nd Amendment list? I don't know what your initial message requested, but it is just a thought. Anyone else receive one tonight?

I finally received this from Alexander         At least he admits that CT has strong gun laws and the problem is not with the gun but with the person pulling the trigger, but I am not really sure that I consider this a comforting reply.

Directly following the Sandy Hook Massacre, there immediately began a calling for the banning of guns. Mental health care was also brought up into the debate. I too feel that the mental health care program in this country isn't perfect. It is, after all, part of the bigger healthcare system that could use a lot of work. However, I wish to bring one point to everyone here today.   Be careful about generalizations. Should we allow unstable people to purchase firearms? That is a tough question. Do they not have just as much a right to protect themselves and their family as anyone else? Also, much like when considering violent crime in general, if an unstable person is not able to acquire a firearm, will they not just find another means to their madness? A mentally unstable person could ram their car into a large group of people, does that mean that mentally unstable people should not be allowed to drive? I don't know. My first reaction is that if we can trust these people in society (instead of in an institution), then they should enjoy the same rights as anyone else. There is obviously a lot that needs to be debated, but that is not necessarily why I created this thread.   I simply see the following scenario as a possibility:   Obama and Co. attempt to ban guns, but it either does not work or they back out due to political ramifications. We consider it a battle won. However, Obama and Co. have the war in mind. So they continue on and really jump on the mental healthcare bandwagon. They take the path of "acceptable" gun control measures in the form of tighter and mandatory background checks (I heard a news anchor on Fox yesterday ask "And who wouldn't agree with that?" in regard to "tighter" background checks). All of this to keep firearms out of the hands of criminals and the mentally unstable. Now, after all of this has faded from everyone's mind, they change the rules a bit. At this point all they have to do to essentially enact a gun ban would be to declare anyone they wish to declare "mentally unstable". Perhaps the leading new research suggests that Viagra has been found to increase violent behaviors. Perhaps the leading new research suggests that anyone with a degree in Physics isn't quire all there. Perhaps the leading new research suggests that anyone that has went through a divorce is ten times more likely to develop bipolar tendencies. Then all of these groups of people can be put on the "unstable" lists. On a list and apply for a HCP? Denied! On a list and try to purchase a new Ruger? Denied!      All I am saying is that I believe that we should fight all regulations regarding firearms.

  They also expire from what I understand. http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/04/22/when-banknotes-expire/

  Shown where?

Is it the Glock ID community thing? I cannot be sure. I am personally hoping it is a carbine. I'd be interested in one as well.

Older fashioned folks are probably better off storing printed photos in a box somewhere. Tech savvy people can get away with uploading them to the internet in various forms after encryption them. I agree that Truecrypt is probably the best bet here, then you can store them in Dropbox, FTP, etc.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/07/funny-money-pundits-float-1-trillion-coin-as-answer-to-debt-ceiling-standoff/

http://libertyandsuch.com/manager-of-fpsrussia-found-murdered/ Interesting. Some reports say he was found on the side of the road, others report he was tied to a chair in his on house?

http://www.gunsnet.net/showthread.php?22317-FPS-Russia-s-manager-found-dead-with-gunshot-wound-to-the-head Looks like it.

Just sent our two Senators another message, essentially telling them that it greatly concerns me as to why I have not received anything from them regarding the 2nd.

Defiance. Lots of Mosin Mania there!

If you idiots aren't careful...       You are going to see this weapon featured on the internet and telescreens by the gun banners, screaming at how this weapon is able to takeout practically any human/vehicle in existence.   :rofl:

Six months ago my wife and I spent our weeklong honeymoon in Asheville. It really is a neat place in many regards. Beautiful town, beautiful mountains. They have amazing food of practically any kind you could ask for. Met some really nice people there too. Also met a lot of off the wall in the creek or possibly even under the creek people too. The city probably isn't for everyone, but we enjoyed it.   They weren't the most gun friendly place I had ever been, but I carried many places while there with no problem.   They also had an interesting Gun/Pawn shop in downtown. Was overpriced, but they had quite a few interesting items.   I'd much rather spend time in Asheville than most places up north or California.

I do however remember seeing a sign outside of a show somewhere stating that you could not do it. I think it was an insurance thing. In all truth rumors like this probably get started in order to prevent people from showing up to shows, doing business outside, and then leaving without ever giving the show any of their money. I could see the people that run these shows becoming irritated at this happening if it appeared a lot were doing it.

I told you guys this is the MOACS (Mother OF All Conspiracy Sites). You know you have hit gold when your site makes the claim that other conspiracy sites are conspiracies! And Hitler was Disney was Roosevelt http://wellaware1.com/hitler.htm

I too just received the same message from Fleischmann. I have yet to receive anything from the senators.    I STILL want to know what happens if someone sends a message to one of these candidates asking FOR more gun control. Will the receive an appeasement response as well? In other words, is it possible to get them to support two positions at once via email?

And right there in the middle...Cleveland, TN VOW Hahahahaha.

I think part of all this may have originated from here:   http://wellaware1.com/fairfield.htm   MOACS