Grand Torino

Typical leftist views of things. Let's apply their agenda instead of common sense. Who ever is shocked by this raise your hand.

Welcome to TGO.

Welcome to TGO.

Damn....that makes me want to go take a couple of Aleve right now. That's gonna leave a mark.

Got mine today....I like it.

I have tons of outside stuff to keep me busy in the Summer months. I've found every place I frequent slows down in the Summer due to outside activities, vacations, chores and the like. I don't think the upgrade has anything to do with it...at least I can't see how. The upgrade works great for me.

It's nice to see a business stand on principle.

Welcome to TGO

Good for you....and him. It took the missus and I over 3 years to get over the loss of our friend of 14 years so I get what your saying. But now we have another and while he's totally different from the other he makes us laugh 100 times a day. He's the funniest and loyal damn dog we have ever seen.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/14/nyt-congress-should-secretly-suspend-second-amendment-rights/ A New York Times editorial advocates for a new law allowing a secret court to take away citizens’ right to own a gun at the discretion of the federal government. Citing the Orlando terror attack that left 50 dead including the shooter and 53 wounded at a gay nightclub, the piece advocates for a “no-buy” list similar to “no-fly” lists. Under the law, suspected terrorists would not be able to buy a gun. In an attempt to ensure the integrity of the lists and preserve due process, the author proposes people only be added to this no-buy list after a secret court rules they are ineligible, similar to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court hearings where the federal government obtains permission to wiretap. Under this proposal, an American who has never been convicted of a crime could be denied their right to buy a gun simply because a secret court decided it should be that way. Read more.

http://fortune.com/2016/06/13/after-orlando-shooting-supreme-court-due-to-consider-assault-rifle-ban-case/ Less than a week after an apparent lone-wolf terrorist used an AR-15 assault-style weapon to carry out the deadliest mass-shooting in U.S. history—leaving at least 50 dead at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Fla.—the constitutionality of a ban on such weapons is scheduled to come before the U.S. Supreme Court. At a regularly scheduled conference on Thursday, the Court will decide whether to grant full review of the case, Shew v. Malloy, which challenges Connecticut laws enacted after the 2012 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. The shooter in that attack, mainly using an AR-15, murdered 20 children and six educators. (An AR-15 was also used in December’s terror-motivated shootings at the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, Calif., which killed 14 people. And it was one of three weapons used at the Aurora, Colo. movie theater shooting in July 2012, which killed 12 people.) Read more.

Good deal......looks like that shop agrees with you.

Welcome to TGO

I'm not trying to explain it....just stating an opinion.

The only reason for them to be off the shelves is because they are sold out. Anything else is a load of crapola.

Welcome to TGO.

If they are really pulling this crap they can kiss my Petunias.....I have no need for politically correct left leaning establishments.

Words of wisdom..all of them.

The problem is the left and that old skank have law abiding gun owners included in the same group as that evil POS that just killed 49 people. She wants us to suffer cause we own those evil black rifles.

Welcome to TGO

Daaaaaamn......that looks right tasty.

Welcome to TGO

Good lookin' blade there Jimbo

In an unrelated note but none the less about SF lawmakers.... http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06/09/san-francisco-pol-wants-flyover-ban-so-blue-angels-cant-strafe-city.html?intcmp=hplnws San Francisco pol wants flyover ban so Blue Angels can't 'strafe' city In the wake of last week's fatal Blue Angels jet crash in Tennessee, a San Francisco lawmaker wants to ban the famed F/A-18 fighter jets from being able to fly over his city -- and, in his words, "strafe neighborhoods." City Supervisor John Avalos, who long has waged a public battle decrying the squadron's aerial acrobatics over San Francisco -- at one point calling them loud "killing machines" -- has introduced a nonbinding resolution to require the jets to only fly over the bay.

Exactly....and you're allowed to carry openly but not under your coat. Really? The 2nd doesn't say you can't carry or even under your coat but some liberal judge want's to nit pick it to death. I'm sorry but I find this kind of ruling ridiculous no matter what some arm chair lawyers seem to think.