No_0ne

Well, I can remember, as a child, ...... What were we talking about again?

I gave up worrying about goofs, inconsistencies, technical errors and anachronisms on this show long ago, makes watching it more enjoyable ...

Well. That assumption certainly wasn't right. Lots of plot twists in this one ...

I'm getting email updates from TGO on the latest account now, but I still have the orange banner stating: "Emails that we send to you are being returned to us. If our emails continue to bounce, we will stop sending emails to you and require you to update your email address. " at the top of each page on the site.

Not sure, however I updated the email to yet another account and got the confirmation link to go through, however I still have the same message appearing on TGO pages as the OP, even after updating the email address.

I'm getting the same message as the OP. Changed the email address, same message, except TGO now shows the updated email address as my current one. Suggestions?

Not bad. The Russians had a better idea though ...

From the previews it seems that maybe we are about to see the apocalyptic battle between the Old Guard and Negan's forces, after all that storyline has been running what, 3 years now?

I think Eugene has gone over to the savior side permanently now. Having both of your old comrades swear to kill you while kidnapping you will tend to do that. I also don't think he much liked the idea of being locked up in a hole until called on to render ideas, after all that scenario isn't nearly as appealing as being Dr. Smarty Pants for Negan, along with the perks of women, wine, and especially garlic flavored sardine enhanced mac and cheese ...

50 "soldiers" wielding automatic weapons ( since it seems everybody in TWD has a FA) is going to really use up a lot of ammo, those 6 guys with the single stage presses are going to have to get after it ...

A half dozen RCBS single round loaders. Eugene needs to read up on progressives ... On the other hand, he does seem to have a massive melt pot ...

Count me interested in any 357 brass you have, also the .38 as well ...

Light snow for 2 or 3 hours this morning in Northwest Tn., enough to whiten the grass and leave some buildup on the trees. Interesting weather we're having this "spring" ...

Only Bubbas ....

Same old song as before, see the Colt saga, pick whichever iteration you want ... I suspect that it worked quite well for the Equity firms, as they were able to sucker another group of gullible investors out of a billion bucks for a marginally-profitable company again ... Again, in the private equity market it works quite well ...

I was equally confident that it never had a chance of passing, even before the Las Vegas shooting ...

Mostly because it's the latest one. There's also been a little more attention paid to the kids who speak well during their 15 minutes of TV time. Like the previous school shootings, eventually something else will come along to push the current hysteria onto the back pages, and the kids will eventually move on to whatever the latest news is about some social media slut ...

"School me on Ar's" - easy. AR's are the scary black rifles which indiscriminately kill kids and kittens, also unicorns. You don't want to be anywhere near one of those things, they can go off in full-auto mode at any time. No one needs an AR to deer hunt, which should be banned anyway as killing Bambi is cruel, and unnecessary, try vegan instead. Since any sane person seeking common sense gun laws will agree, the evil black rifles like AR's should be melted down and turned into recyclable container collectors, why not try one of the "good guns", which are ok to own (but not of course to actually shoot) like shotguns (highly recommended by Uncle Joe), revolvers (John Wayne used those), bolt rifles like Mosins (these aren't dangerous at all and leave you with a warm, fuzzy feeling for all the benighted proles and peasants left penniless by the ravages of capitalism), airsoft guns, and of course the recommended defensive weapons of choice, whistles and water pistols ...

"French rifle, never fired. Dropped once" ...

Many do, but there are several who do not have fulltime SRO's. It runs from larger metro schools with multiple officers to small, rural schools with none, and every iteration in between. In some systems, officers are shared across several campuses, others employ fulltime officers at the high school but either have no SRO's assigned to the lower grades or share an officer between two or more schools. The variations are as diverse as the schools themselves ...

Not a chance, as long as he has his twitter account ...

Not at all, just responding to the previous comment that machine guns are illegal. The 1986 act definitely had an effect, as it put an end to new stamps being issued for MG's.

The courts have been pretty consistent in prior rulings that states have the right to regulate the "bearing" of arms by their citizens, including whether or not to allow open/concealed carry. To date, no case dealing with this issue has made it to the SCOTUS, lower court rulings have mostly been "no, each state has a right to decide how it's citizens bear arms" to this question ... While the original definition of "assault rifles" (circa WWII) was clearly a rifles firing reduced caliber ammunition in full auto configuration, the term has become more amorphous since, and pretty much depends on whomever is making the argument now ... It's not, those rifles are in the hands of some citizens now, in the form of Class III weapons, requiring the federal tax stamps. SCOTUS has ruled repeatedly that Congress has the right to impose taxes, and that the NFA is a tax law, not a law which outlaws machine guns. The Treasury dept. made the decision to stop issuing any new MG tax stamps in 1986, thus only those rifles made before that time can get a stamp, therefore paying the tax which makes them legal to possess. These laws and decisions have already been adjudicated and found constitutional ... If you look at the history of previous rulings by the SCOTUS on national gun laws, most of the decisions have been framed fairly narrowly, and in a consistent manner. There are, of course, one or two "head-scratchers", but you find this with most issues which have been repeatedly looked at over time. One example is "US v. Miller", of 1939, which basically ruled sawed-off shotguns illegal, the argument was whether or not such a weapon was in common usage in the military, but since the defendant died before the case got to the SCOTUS the court let stand the decision of the lower courts which mandated a barrel length of 18" or more. Most observers agree that this decision could probably be overturned in another case, but to date no case has come before the SCOTUS dealing with shotgun barrel lengths. As for the assertion that the SCOTUS "has" to one day answer the questions the OP posed, maybe. Based on the court's history regarding gun laws though, it's going to take a case which is very narrowly framed with very specific questions for the court to agree to hear it. To date, there have been no cases which fit that definition ...

I'm a bit confused. If you only go into REI (whatever that is) to browse gear to order online, how exactly do you boycott them?

Even a cursory glance at his past statements and positions would show that he has always been well-versed in this art ...