E4 No More

It looks blue that's plain.

The racking of a 12 gauge shotgun would immediately get a lot of people's attention.

You'd think, but it wasn't just a few years ago, (after several church shooting including the one in Paducah), I heard a congregant talking anti-gun as he was walking up to the church remarking that he was glad guns weren't in his church. He was sooo wrong. He left a few months after he made that comment. I don't know why. Stuff got real with my church after the church shooting in Antioch. You see, one of our church members that I knew for years was the Fiance, (and now, wife), of the young man who neutralized the shooter.

Did you see when said asshole took credit for there being no violence?

You should be ostracized just for posting something so ugly!

I do feel special now.

I have asked the agent. That's why I commented.

Not according to my insurance agent. Why do you suppose that the state now automatically checks license plates to an insurance database? They are relating a specific vehicle to an active insurance policy, not drivers.

I would recommend considering the difference between possibility and probability. The imagination can come up with all sorts of possibilities that are not very probable. For instance, how likely are you going to have 6 people jump out of a van with AK's and AR-15's to attack your church? It's not likely to happen at all given that attacks thus far have been two shooters at most and that was statistically rare. [referencing the recent New Jersey attack by a couple of Hebrew Israelites] The odds are far greater that IF your church is attacked then it is likely to be one attacker. You should look at your church with the view of if you wanted to attack it then how would you do it? If you could find someone as crazy as you, then how would you do it with two? That is much more likely. You also have to consider not alarming the sheep. In that way I mean the anti-gun congregant who would be VERY alarmed knowing there are guns around him/her in a place where love and understanding are supposed to rule. Too much and they can be very vocal with the elders, and my have enough clout to effect decisions.

That 390 4bbl would flat out run, especially the Interceptor pkg. Remember it quite well.. My wife's first car was a Galaxy 500 that had a 428 HiPo engine in it. The engine was a beast and leaked oil like a sieve. I found it odd that they'd put an engine like that without some version of posi-traction differential. The car would absolutely roast the passenger side rear tire.

From my insurance agent: "Remember if you loan the kids the vehicle insurance follows the vehicle so your autos are covered but we do need to get them added somewhere if they have regular access to the autos"

I just asked my agent about this. He said that the total coverage follows the vehicle; not the driver.

How did we ever survive without permits and range qualifications?

First car I drove regularly was my mom's 1969 Dodge Dart w/a 225 slant six. First car I owned was a 1976 Buick Century with a 455 lean burn.

The way that I understand it is that comprehensive coverage follows the vehicle whereas liability coverage follows the driver. That's why if there is a lien on the car the lien-holder isn't out the money if you loan your financed vehicle out to someone and they wreck it. The liability coverage covers the damage to another person's property.

The government has laws in place to prevent a corrupt bidding process, and a dinner wouldn't cut it anyway. The laws pretty much limits you to a doughnut and a cup of coffee. That varies from state to state. Being in technical sales and dealing with a lot of local government accounts during my years, it is mostly bias towards a solution and then writing that bias into an RFP so that only a specific vendor or manufacturer can fulfill the requirements of the RFP. Cisco and their loyal users, for instance, does this a lot. They use a proprietary protocol, such as Cisco's EIGRP, (a routing protocol), and write that into the RFP as a requirement regardless of whether or not the agency is even going to use it so that only Cisco can fulfill the RFP requirement and "win" the business. To appear "fair" they'll even write in "or the equivalent" which is never the case for a proprietary feature. Cisco wins the business and the Cisco Certified whatever user keeps his Cisco certifications relevant to the organization for which he/she works.

Yep, I have two grandsons living with me. I bought an old Jeep Compass for them to drive. Liability only insurance for them is over $5,000 per year.

Good for you!

Why doesn't he just call their office and ask them?

Or it's what their parents give them to drive. I know that my parents didn't give me a choice as to what I drove in high school.

I should have said that I doubt that many people buy them for the giggles of it. I camped much more than that. Usually a couple of times per month in the spring and fall. I hated driving the truck and hitting a good bump or depression in the road when the 5th wheel wasn't hooked up. I also didn't like how the back end would walk around on me when traversing a rough cloverleaf.

That looks like an 1800's drag queen.

These trucks ain't exactly Cadillacs when they aren't under load so I doubt people buy them and drive them for the giggles of it. When my wife and I decided not to camp anymore and sell our 5th wheel, the first thing I did was go trade my 1 ton for a 1/2 ton. Now I can drive around town comfortably.

Heck, I had a SRW 1 ton bought new without the front license plate bracket installed. I just assumed that it was optional to mount the plate up front.

What Dave said, employment is "At will" and that means either party. You can quit for no reason and they can fire you for no reason. The difference in your case is that if they cite no reason for your termination then they must pay unemployment. If they cite that you broke a company rule that you were properly warned about then they don't have to pay unemployment.