Omega

I think it's due to all the media attention and BLM movement instead of the actual facts of the case.

In that decision, they stated a police officer may not shoot a fleeing perp to apprehend him (ruled against the police force). In this case, he was not shot to apprehend him, he was shot because he presented a danger to the officer.

There is nothing, even in the video, to contradict the officers statement. So if he indeed turned, with the gun, it could have been seen as a threat.

Umm, yea I just said the same thing.

That does not apply here IMO, he was not shot due to fleeing, he was shot because he did not drop his weapon when told to and presented a clear and present danger to the officer and society at large.

That there is one of those fast and furious rifles, the feds want nothing to do with it.

I like it, there are enough old rifles out there, so reworking a few is kind of cool.

Ok, so are we talking male or female? Because this whole he/she BS is confusing as all get out.

I'll take a wait n see on this one, nothing so far has shown he won't still be anti-gun. As to attacking the person vs the message, I agree somewhat, but some of these people, ie Hogg, Pelosi, et al, make it so easy to label them as idiots and treat them as such.

My condolences, though we all know it will come it doesn't make it any easier when it does.

I'm good, I have enough LC FMJ 7.62x51, and berdan cases.

Yea, but they make good bottle openers.

That is one thing that bugs me a bit, how is it on the guy to know someone is underage on a site like that, or say a bar or other establishment in which you must be at least 18 to be on/in? Not saying in this case he didn't know, but some of those girls look way older than they are.

Maybe they've seen the light??? Nah, I'm sure they can justify them having guns while still demanding ours.

What, no brace?

The picture story, is wrong: https://www.dallasnews.com/news/crime/2018/09/09/internet-wrong-botham-jean-officer-amber-guyger-didnt-pose-together-photo

In that case, the signs suck.

My understanding is that no money will be spent to remove the signs, but carry is legal unless one of the exclusions exist.

I can see her not knowing him, and those entrances look identical: https://www.star-telegram.com/news/local/community/dallas/article218068660.html And in the way this is written, I can see how it could have happened that way. She, IMHO, is still liable, but I can see how anyone could have made the same mistake. https://www.star-telegram.com/news/local/community/dallas/article218154635.html

They are good, I used to fish them quite often. Them and hybrids, taste the same to me, are abundant in the places I used to fish.

I searched her name, she posts some gruesome pics, but it seems many are not her own pics so she may be getting second-hand info. But, seeing as these are during surgery, it may be that the cleaning of the wound, removing damaged tissue, is what we are looking at.

Just waiting for the next prairie dog, or German..whatever.

I've read, no experience, that they are good for 12 years or so, then they have to be recertified, then every 5 years. I was looking to get a larger tank to keep at my hunting location, to use instead of the regular ones on my travel trailer, but most used ones I found were older and didn't want to mess with the recertification.

I can see loosing a hand due to damage, but looking at the picture it just seems like too much for a ND. I would think that it would be a clean hole with maybe some damage from the muzzle blast.

Seems like too much damage to be a gunshot, at least at close range, I might believe a kaboom, but not a ND.