DaveTN

Sure, I will. Because the Trump Administration got it through with Operation Warp Speed, by throwing money at it and negotiating with the FDA. They are afraid there is something in the design to kill liberals; or at least make them see the light.

Bah, humbug no family for us this year. But I hope you all have a good Turkey day, and good health.

I’d take it tomorrow, no questions asked; I see it as my duty to help end this thing and save lives. So, I guess I’ll be the last to get it. I would think all front-line workers being exposed everyday would want to take it. But I’ve been wrong before.

No! I refuse to be part of this pricing scam. Someone that wants Garand food (who lives close by) might eventually do a trade. I also have "notify me when available" on some of the more respectable ammo sites. In the meantime both the guns I bought will shoot other calibers; that I do have.

Or, after you had decided not to add any new calibers; you add two during Covid/Riots/Biden. How stupid is that??

And my 90 year old parents who are in assisted living, quarantined to their apartment. It goes through those places like wild fire and those people are without a doubt the highest risk for death. They should be in the same category as healthcare workers. It’s the government. I thought they were on a path to being on top of this vaccine rollout. I should have known better.

Exactly! All we have heard is how the kids need to be in school because their rates are nearly zero. The dissenters claim they will bring it home to Grandma and Grandpa. Yet it appears Grandma and Grandpa will be in the last group, getting the vaccine next summer. That’s crazy.

I could be wrong, but I don’t think any of that will help. There is too little time, too many jurisdictions, too many criminals counting and changing ballots, and too little hard core evidence that can be used in court. Couple that with a mindset that criminal acts are justified to get their way “at any cost”, fear of riots if the elections were legitimate, and the biggest percentage of the media siding with the liberals; and we have a problem that will be tough to overcome.

It would be nice if that were true; but it isn’t. If that were true, they would have been out of business the last time they did this and everyone posted they would never buy anything from them again. But they are still in business because people will buy from whoever has the best price/availability at the time. We see plenty of people attempting to rip others on ammo prices.

We better hope the SCOTUS helps. They are going to have to do their job. “It’s within our grasp to end our gun violence epidemic and respect the Second Amendment, which is limited.” The SCOTUS has to quit dodging the issues and lay out precisely what our rights are. Of course if the Dems are allowed to pack the court; that will be a problem. We just lost Remington even with the “Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act”. They could no longer afford to defend themselves. If that is repealed; all our American gun manufacturers will be gone. And it appears “imports” can be easily stopped. I suspect this won’t stop with guns either. If they can justify holding the gun manufacturers accountable for the actions of criminals; they can do the same with Drunk drivers and the automobile industry. Its about paydays for people that live off the government and they will do anything to do that; no matter what the cost to our economy and the working class. Liberals want to destroy big business and the wealthy. They aren't smart enough to understand the consequences, or they just don’t care, as long as it gets them reelected. I suspect, just like the Presidential election, truck loads of illegal ballots will show up in Georgia and the Senate could be compromised.

I saw this on the news. I don’t know where the elderly, mainly those in assisted living facilities, fall in this plan, but it appears they (the highest death rate group by far) would be in group four. Group four won’t get the vaccine until the summer. I wonder who “essential workers” will be. All I’ve been hearing is how fast this is going to rollout. You would need to have a vivid imagination to think 8 months for the general public is a “fast” rollout.

My initial thoughts were that if we don’t have the professionals at the CDC to give us the information we need; that’s a big problem. As far as Trump goes; now it's mostly the hardcore Trump haters that refuse to listen to anything, so that wouldn't have mattered anyways. Anyone that disagrees with them here; they just call them out by name and say they “know” what’s in those people’s minds. If you remember correctly Trump tried to put Pence in charge of the COVID Task Force and have him do the briefings. But of course the MSM was having no part of that. They got Trump in there by saying he didn’t care and wasn’t doing anything. All they wanted to do was ask stupid questions and make ridiculous accusations. Like an idiot; he fell for it. Both parties and all elected officials should be ashamed. This should have never been a political issue; but it was and Americans died because of it. We should have a vaccine released in the next 2-3 weeks. If the elderly get it first, the death rates should start dropping around the time Biden takes office. Then two and fours years from now, we can hear about how Joe turned things around.

I reset my gateway every month or so, and replace it every two years or so; they go bad. My two main PC’s are ethernet and run about 350 Mbps, but my wifi speeds on my laptops had dropped to 30-40 Mbps, 5 feet from the gateway. I waited until I could get the new XB7 to replace the XB6. When I did that my older devices jumped up some, but my newest laptop went from 30-40 to 310. My cameras don’t lag anymore either. I didn’t want an in person visit. They just seem to chase their tail thinking its faulty cable; it never is.

As I understand it one of the vaccines (it appears two will be released about the same time) requires two shots 3 weeks apart. More are in the works, as vaccines are the way out. I have taken a bunch of vitamins everyday for years. The vitamin D claim is certainly controversial, but there is no reason not to take it daily. It obviously isn’t the way out or we would not be seeing what we are seeing now, but hopefully vitamins help.

I lightened it up a little, so you can see better.

https://www.choketube.com/accessories-product-details-R.php?Shotgun-Magazine-Extension&mf=500 Brownells sells these, They might have a better price; I don't know.

Or they are counting the one bullet everyone keeps in their front shirt pocket.

I was wondering the same thing. Never saw anything like that before.

Looks like there is some new technology in revolvers. 6+1

I agree, that’s why I quit using them. It’s been that way for years. I thought someone would have, by now, started a site that wasn’t retail; but it hasn’t happened yet. If I’m buying new, they can’t compete with Amazon Prime.

Can you see any of your family?

I don’t know much about FIGHTBACK, or GIVESENDGO, but they are taking donations for Kyles defense fund. Of course the MSM doesn’t cover this, so its hard to tell who they are, or who “Friends Of The Rittenhouse Family, Atlanta, Ga” is. GOFUNDME wouldn’t allow a webpage for a Kyle defense fund. So much for innocent until proven guilty. I’ve sent money to GOFUNDME; but never again. Of course they don’t care; they aren’t taking the loss; the people that need their site are. But if those sites are legit, it looks like they are making their goals.

I don't know how these prices are, but Frankford Arsenal has a sale on tumbling stuff that ends tonight. https://www.frankfordarsenal.com/case-cleaning/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=frankford&utm_campaign=bfweek3_lastday&utm_term=body&utm_content=sale_button1

The wife and I got tested yesterday. She wasn’t feeling good and her work told her to get tested and stay home until she got the results back. The drive through line was over two blocks long, but moved pretty fast; it took about 30 minutes. They said usually is takes about 3 days for results, but due to the increased testing they expected it could take 5 days or more.

I don’t see much of a way out for him. I suspect this will end in a plea bargain. They’ll want his testimony against Kyle. Below is the law we are talking about. You can make your own decisions about what it says. It requires no intent to harm someone, only intent to transfer, which he has confessed to. He could also face Federal charges should the feds decide to go that route. .......................................................................................... 2013 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations 948. Crimes against children. 948.60 Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18. Universal Citation: WI Stat § 948.60 (2013 through Act 380) 948.60  Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18. (1) In this section, "dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends. (2)  (a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor. (b) Except as provided in par. (c), any person who intentionally sells, loans or gives a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age is guilty of a Class I felony. (c) Whoever violates par. (b) is guilty of a Class H felony if the person under 18 years of age under par. (b) discharges the firearm and the discharge causes death to himself, herself or another. (d) A person under 17 years of age who has violated this subsection is subject to the provisions of ch. 938 unless jurisdiction is waived under s. 938.18 or the person is subject to the jurisdiction of a court of criminal jurisdiction under s. 938.183. (3)  (a) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult. This section does not apply to an adult who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age for use only in target practice under the adult's supervision or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the adult's supervision. (b) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon in the line of duty. This section does not apply to an adult who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age in the line of duty. (c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28. History: 1987 a. 332; 1991 a. 18, 139; 1993 a. 98; 1995 a. 27, 77; 1997 a. 248; 2001 a. 109; 2005 a. 163; 2011 a. 35. Sub. (2) (b) does not set a standard for civil liability, and a violation of sub. (2) (b) does not constitute negligence per se. Logarto v. Gustafson, 998 F. Supp. 998 (1998).