Chucktshoes

It’s a pleasant 41* here in eastern Oregon. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

It’s such a cool design, hopefully a larger company will buy their IP and start producing them.

I actually think this is pretty cool as a long term storage idea.

I didn’t say they were cheap. Of course I’ve got over $3500 in my FAL. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ The only reason FALs were so cheap for so long was the plethora of surplus parts kits that were floating around after such wide adoption around the world.

It exists. It’s called the SCAR 17.

The FAL was always the superior design. We never should have fielded the M-14.

The more I read about this, the more I want to try it. If it delivers as advertised, it seems like it would be the perfect subgun ammo. Might even get me off the fence for an Evo.

Here’s the write up on it from TTAG. It goes a bit more in depth as to how even a narrow ruling can be a big win for us. https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2019/01/daniel-zimmerman/breaking-supreme-court-grants-cert-to-ny-state-rifle-pistol-assn-v-city-of-ny/ Oh, and here’s an article from the folks over at Slate freaking the eff out over this case. It’s good for a laugh. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/01/supreme-court-new-york-gun-case-heller.html This is a case to watch closely because I believe it will make a seemingly small, but ultimately very significant, step towards that ultimate goal of officially recognizing that the 2A covers the bearing of arms outside the home.

His knife sheaths are excellent as well. They are a perfect compliment to GT’s knives. Also, that’s a really cool design. Totally impractical for me, but still an awesome looking setup.

Apparently. I congratulate you on your ability to hide it. I went back to reread it and still can’t find it.

Are there any high fence hunting facilities in that area?

Sweet!

To add to this, I’m an anarchist. I reject the idea of government being a legitimate entity on principle, and yet I went and got a lifetime permit because I understand the reality of the world we live in. There’s a difference between acting on principle and acting on pride. It’s best not to get them confused.

Agree. Unecessary.

I don’t think anyone is disagreeing with that premise, I just think that some of the others in the conversation just want to ensure they can keep shooting as long as it takes to find that exit. I intend to be able to be in the fight as long as I have to be, no matter how long that takes. That means having enough ammo to keep shooting until I can escape, or the other guy decides that he doesn’t want to fight anymore or has that choice made for him.

My friend Ryan is from OH. His response to that limitation is to use a .450 Bushmaster for deer. It’s a completely stupid rule.

He wasn’t the hero we wanted, but he was the hero we needed.

You would be wrong. That’s the main premise of the lawsuit.

Here ya go folks: https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2019/01/22/shot-2019-new-c9-hi-point-pistol/

Sorta like Texas where when you enter the state house, if you show them your carry permit, they waive you around the security checkpoint where they screen using metal detectors, eh?

We have a total eclipse of the sky going on in my neck of the woods.

I could be wrong, but I think most of the places with an AWB tie all the banned characteristics into semi-autos.

Someone who can’t get one otherwise?

You might have just found the one thing we agree on. This is all just show for political gain in how it is being handled.