Jump to content

Maryland State Supreme Court on firearms ballistics matching


Recommended Posts

  • Moderators

The Maryland Supreme Court has decided that firearms ballistic experts cannot give unqualified testimony regarding whether or not a particular bullet was fired from a particular gun because it’s just not scientifically possible. This is an excellent, excellent decision from a court striking at the junk science that comprises most of crime scene forensics.CSI may have been enjoyable television, but it’s also mostly science, fiction and fantasy.

 

https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/marylands-highest-court-limits-ballistics-evidence-trials-100286757

 

 

Edited by Chucktshoes
  • Like 8
Link to comment
32 minutes ago, Chucktshoes said:

The Maryland Supreme Court has decided that firearms ballistic experts cannot give unqualified testimony regarding whether or not a particular bullet was fired from a particular gun because it’s just not scientifically possible. This is an excellent, excellent decision from a court striking at the junk science that comprises most of crime scene forensics.CSI may have been enjoyable television, but it’s also mostly science, fiction and fantasy.

 

https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/marylands-highest-court-limits-ballistics-evidence-trials-100286757

 

 

I have wondered about this for years. It never seemed like an actual science. Same with bite marks. I think they finally stopped allowing that after several people were falsely convicted because of junk bite mark "science". Thanks for sharing this news. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
2 hours ago, Chucktshoes said:

The Maryland Supreme Court has decided that firearms ballistic experts cannot give unqualified testimony regarding whether or not a particular bullet was fired from a particular gun because it’s just not scientifically possible. This is an excellent, excellent decision from a court striking at the junk science that comprises most of crime scene forensics.CSI may have been enjoyable television, but it’s also mostly science, fiction and fantasy.

 

https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/marylands-highest-court-limits-ballistics-evidence-trials-100286757

 

 

It's always seemed like this would be super easy for any decent lawyer to refute in court. 

A basic knowledge of statistics says its all  total nonsense. Even calling it "science" bugs me.  Some universities offer a degree in forensic science, I hope there's more to it than this bullet matching silliness. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment

G. Gordon Liddy caught crap years ago talking about how you could change the marks left on a bullet from the barrel by using a rat tail file in the barrel. I remember it went on for a few days, people from LEO to everyday people calling him out for helping bad guys. He response was something like bad guys know how to change the marks in a barrel, so I have told the bad guys nothing.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • Moderators
18 hours ago, RED333 said:

G. Gordon Liddy caught crap years ago talking about how you could change the marks left on a bullet from the barrel by using a rat tail file in the barrel. I remember it went on for a few days, people from LEO to everyday people calling him out for helping bad guys. He response was something like bad guys know how to change the marks in a barrel, so I have told the bad guys nothing.

Hell, you don’t even have to take a file to it. Just shoot it enough and it’ll change on its own through wear. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
  • Admin Team

One of my hobbies as a forensic scientist is going back and taking an in depth look at old cases - and being amazed at the ones we couldn't even bring to trial today much less get a conviction on because the "forensics" is garbage.

So much legacy crime scene forensics is pseudoscience at best.  Most ballistics, blood spatter, fiber analysis, is just garbage.

Case in point - one of our most famous cases in Tennessee.  James Earl Ray bought a Remington 760 Gamemaster in Birmingham that was recovered on the street - neatly wrapped up in a quilt - in Memphis.  It was chambered in .30-06.  A 30 caliber slug killed Dr. King on the balcony of the Lorraine Motel.  Problem is - the fragments of the slug recovered from Dr. King absolutely don't match the twist rate of the aforementioned Gamemaster.  The rifle that was recovered didn't kill Dr. King.

Same with a famous case from my childhood in Atlanta - Wayne Williams - convicted of the Atlanta child murders.  We couldn't even bring that case to trial today.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
35 minutes ago, MacGyver said:

The rifle that was recovered didn't kill Dr. King.

Because James Earl Ray did not kill Dr King. He likely wasn't even involved. One of the best frame jobs in history. 

Did you listen to that podcast yet? 

Link to comment
  • Admin Team
2 hours ago, Erik88 said:

Because James Earl Ray did not kill Dr King. He likely wasn't even involved. One of the best frame jobs in history. 

Did you listen to that podcast yet? 

The MLK Tapes?  Yes.

Bill Pepper may not be a totally reliable narrator - but he doesn’t have to be. The King family doesn’t believe he did it either. 

Link to comment

I never thought Ray killed King and never believed Oswald killed Kennedy. The McGruder film shows Kennedy being pushed forward by a bullet from possibly Oswald that ended up in the Governor of Texas hand. Kennedys head being blown backwards and back of his head destroyed and Oswald was shooting from an elevated location behind the motorcade. Kennedy was shot from street level. There was 2 shooters in Dallas that day. Oswald and  Professional hitman, code name Saul. It will all come out when they finally release all the records....JMHO

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.