Leaderboard

Him and his wife are probably the most damaging people to gun owners. The both of them, and the Brady Campaign, are responsible for more damage than anyone else. Not in their legislation but in them pushing that guns, and gun owners, are a bad thing to the public. Had he died from his wounds that day we would have been in a better place today. I have zero sympathy for him, his wife or anyone who supports their agenda.   I heard on the news this morning the left are going to try to use his death to renew interest in a nationwide ban on assault weapons. They are saying that a ban on assault weapons would be fitting way to honor him. 

Buford - former mnpd, former tgo member, former guy with 10 fingers...

Found this in the elevator at work. (Yes I know should take the stairs.) I hear the movie will be out in September. I know my wife won't go, but I will be there.

Ecclesiastes 1:9-11 What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun. Is there anything of which one can say "Look! This is something new"? It was here already, long ago;it was here before our time. There is no remembrance of men of old, and even those who are yet to come Will not be remembered by those who follow.

Don't go too small. If it says 2-person, assume it will comfortably hold one. But just to try out camping, get a "bargain" type. Get your wife a nice thick sleeping pad and a good sleeping bag. Those are more important than the tent, IMO. I spent most of one summer sleeping on a cheap inflatable pool float. Very comfortable, but it eventually started leaking. BTW, I don't consider Coleman to be a high-end brand when it comes to tents and such. Not in the same class as Kelty or North Face anyway. Its been a while since I've slept on the ground though, so some things might have changed.

  Using not so subtle racist language like that is about the fastest way to get ignored and ridiculed in my book.  It tends to show the authors true colors.   The poor white Christian males will be just fine. White trash can put a pit bull in the backyard just as easily as any other race can.  But hey, why not assoicate it with the political assention of minorities to keep people outraged. :rolleyes:  

To the moderators:      If this belongs in Hive please move it     Written by a USMC Vet. (I can't argue with any of it. Passing it along as it was received.) >>   >>He wrote: >>   >>The American Dream ended (on November 6th, 2012) in Ohio. The second term of Barack Obama will be the final nail in the coffin for the legacy of the white Christian males who discovered, explored, pioneered, settled and developed the greatest Republic in the history of mankind. >>   >>A coalition of Blacks, Latinos, Feminists, Gays, Government Workers, Union Members, Environmental Extremists, The Media, Hollywood, uninformed young people, the "forever needy," the chronically unemployed, illegal aliens and other "fellow travelers" have ended Norman Rockwell's America. >>The Cocker Spaniel is off the front porch... The Pit Bull is in the back yard. The American Constitution has been replaced with Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals" and Chicago shyster, David Axelrod, along with international Socialist George Soros will be pulling the strings on their beige puppet to bring us Act 2 of the New World Order. >>   >>Our side ran two candidates who couldn't even win their own home states, and Chris Christie helped Obama over the top with a glowing "post Sandy" tribute that elevated the "Commander-in-Chief" to Mother Teresa status. (Aside: with the way the polls were run, he didn't need any help!) >>People like me are completely politically irrelevant, and I will never again comment on or concern myself with the aforementioned coalition which has surrendered our culture, our heritage and our traditions without a shot being fired. >>   >>You will never again out-vote these people. It will take individual acts of defiance and massive displays of civil disobedience to get back the rights we have allowed them to take away. It will take Zealots, not moderates & shy not reach-across-the-aisle RINOs to right this ship and restore our beloved country to its former status. >>   >>Those who come after us will have to risk their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor to bring back the Republic that this generation has timidly frittered away due to "white guilt" and political correctness... An American Veteran......... Semper-Fi >>   >>Got the guts to pass it on? >>You betcha!!!!!

Let it go.  The man knows what he wants.

[quote name="vontar" post="1175649" timestamp="1407193833"]I never read the book, but my wife did. Funny thing, most people that I have met that read the book refuse to watch the movie. While others that watched the movie really appreciated it. Like I said, my wife read it in high school and refuses to watch the movie with me.[/quote] The movie can never fully capture the book. Hopefully it makes the book more accessible to the masses who would never try to pick iy up

Wow...thanks for the outstanding quick and informative information everyone.  I can see this is shaping up to be a great forum!   I'll definitely shop around local and see what's available.  I won't bother asking where to start on that front...I'll do some searching on the forums here and see what folks have already I'm sure recommended on 100 other threads.   Much appreciated!

  You forwarded (or in this case posted) it with no commentary, as a stand alone work, so that can make people assume you agree with it.  Silence equals consent.    If you didn't agree with all of his points, you could have pointed out disagreements and counterpoints before or after it without any edits.    This is the danger with chain emails and the like. The echo chamber effect and the ease of using the forward, like or share button have stopped people from looking at the whole body of work and asking themselves, "do I agree with the sentiment and tone of all this?"    Conservatives have plenty of actual issues to disagree on the President with.  I'll respect those disagreements even as I argue against some of them.  But when anybody tries to disguise in racist jabs that are little better than dog whistles, I'm going to call BS every time.     No kidding.  My cousin and I were texting about those adult responsibilities and problems we have now and I fondly reminisced, "Remember when all we needed to pay for ourselves, were the beer and liquor we weren't supposed to be drinking?"

To paraphrase a lot of what Nick says, the "good old days" were back before you had adult responsibilities and problems.  Ask your parents if you're fortunate enough to have one or both living.  I bet your "good old days" weren't theirs because they were busy worrying about buying groceries, paying the mortgage and raising you.   There are things I miss and things I wish weren't the way they are and as such I long for different times on occasion.  I think it's just part of the aging process.  At the same time, I think it best to be careful when talking with younger folks to not always be negative with them about the state of the world.  In doing so, you may be taking away their "good old days."   

Yeah, he lost me here: ">>A coalition of Blacks, Latinos, Feminists, Gays, Government Workers, Union Members, Environmental Extremists, The Media, Hollywood, uninformed young people, the "forever needy," the chronically unemployed, illegal aliens and other "fellow travelers" have ended Norman Rockwell's America." Like Bersa, I think there are some good points here, but the underlying theme here seem to be IMHO "Things aren't the way they once were. I want things to be the way they once were." I'd agree that there are a lot of things these days I'm not so crazy about, but the idea of wanting to plunge us all back as a society into the 40's - early 60's seems really stupid to me. I also can't help but wonder about these messages when I get them. It strikes me funny that so many people in their 50's and 60's want to go back to the way things were in the 50's and 60's. I think there's a lot of folks this age wearing their rose colored glasses looking back at those years. One thing to keep in mind while reminiscing, if you were a child in a given decade, odds are strong you're not remembering all there was to it. Case in point, I look back fondly at the mid-1980's as a simpler, safer time where kids could play in the streets unsupervised till past dark, there wasn't so much crap in our food, people were nicer, air was cleaner, etc. It's all about perspective. I'd also invite the author to spend some time outside of a city more often. Little bits of the Norman Rockwell American dream are still spread out all over this country.

As a general rule in my book... everything is the governments fault ;)  It has the added benefit of normally being right ;)   Take a $400 a week drug habit and turn it into a $4 a week drug habit and you're talking a lot fewer crimes to feed their habit though.   Bad people will do bad things, nothing we can do will ever changes that...  we lock up those bad people and keep them separate from the rest of us...   But, how many people in your career did you arrest who were trying to steal to feed their smoking or drinking habit?  How much of our property crime is really related to cost of tobacco and alcohol?  I'd estimate it to be a very small fraction of said crime.  More importantly, when was the last time you saw Marlboro men do a drive by on Joe Camel's men over a street corner?   Maybe we trade a 10-15% increase in violent crime due to some more folks becoming addicted to drugs...  but in return we drastically reduce violent crime by moving the sale of drugs from the streets to stores, along with reducing petty and property crimes by drastically reducing the price of the product...  drastically reduce law enforcement costs, K9 units, asset seizures, questionable searches, no knock raids, shooting of family pets... etc.     It's not some utopia, those don't exist, but it's clear to any rational person that the war on drugs is much worse at this point, than the drugs themselves.    

Are those the scenarios? I know the Russians have subs off our coast; they always have had. We do the same to them. What do you think those subs will do? The Islamic centers will be dealt with locally if they become a problem. And unless posse comitatus is repealed (and it will be some day) the border is not a military issue now. I’m not making any arguments for cutting military spending; I just don’t understand how anyone would think that would lead to an invasion of our country.

I still like the comparison of Chicago to Houston: http://gunfreezone.net/wordpress/index.php/2013/03/06/a-tale-of-two-cities-chicago-vs-houston/ [URL=http://s963.photobucket.com/user/runco0318/media/chicagovshouston_zpsf3e56cf0.jpg.html][/URL]

Folks, we've all heard about the good rivers and trout streams that vein their way across the state of Tennessee and offer some very fine fishing opportunitys. I'm not going to give up many secrets here, but, there is some real good trout fishing opportunitys tucked away in the streams located on Fort Campbell Military base. One of the best being on the old Clarksville Base area. To trout fish Fort Campbell you will need a Tennessee or Kentucky Fishing license, Trout Stamp and a Fort Campbell Fishing permit. Area assignments are required and are obtainable at the MWR Hunting and Fishing Unit. PH (270)798-2175 The trout streams are stocked on a regular basis by the TWRA, USFWS and the Kentucky Department of WIldlife. TWRA and USFWS stock 700 to 800 pounds of Rainbow trout at the 3 release sites. These are hatchery fish from the Dale Hollow National Fish Hatchery, and the average size trouts are 9-12 inch rainbows (a few are 14), 6-8 inch Brook Trout and some nice Browns. There are alot of "holdover" fish to be had, as many fish are escaping capture and are growing quite well, a few trout are showing up in the creel that are 19-24 inch. Very impressive! A few pics to share... A nice wadable section of stream. My Grandson on his first Trout Fishing outing. Here he is with his first ever Trout! A nice little Rainbow... A beauty! Just me.... I'll try to get some more posted later. Dave

A steal at only 4300 clams!   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjQk244oW9c   - OS

Victorinox tinkerer in pink muddy girl?

  It must have all the mods. For science!

The first movie cast was great. The second not so much.

I had an inexpensive coleman tent and it was fine for moderate TN and TX weather.  Ease of setting up, good ventilation and netting seemed to be the most important features to look for.

If you are wanting wife to continue to camp with you I would suggest this tent: Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

  Keep ethanol gas away from those things. Biggest killer of engines (especially two-stroke) I know of.

I assume 3 season. I would buy name brand just because of warranty and quality and I'm kind of a gear queer. Just like I wouldn't buy a Hi-Point instead of a Glock. [url="http://www.backcountry.com/the-north-face-stormbreak-2-tent-2-person-3-season?ti=UExQIENhdDozLVNlYXNvbiBUZW50czoxOjQ6YmNzQ2F0NzExMDAwNDE&skid=TNF00CN-CASGREYL-ONESIZ"]http://www.backcountry.com/the-north-face-stormbreak-2-tent-2-person-3-season?ti=UExQIENhdDozLVNlYXNvbiBUZW50czoxOjQ6YmNzQ2F0NzExMDAwNDE&skid=TNF00CN-CASGREYL-ONESIZ[/url] http://www.backcountry.com/kelty-grand-mesa-2-tent-2-person-3-season?ti=UExQIENhdDozLVNlYXNvbiBUZW50czoxOjU6YmNzQ2F0NzExMDAwNDE&skid=KEL0763-ONECOL-ONESIZ

  Very much this. Consider also storage space for your gear. For two people, you'll want either a 3 or possibly 4 person tent.

This, with the same exact ammo. I dare say this will be the answer in many cases.

Shop local before you buy the lower. Reason I say this, for a lower you may find a good deal on one and that is great, until you go pick it up and add a $25 or $35 transfer fee to it. Ask me how I know lol.

I'd say a private ceremony would be a more fitting way personally, but then I'm really just trying to be good on this one. I personally won't honor his send off anymore than I honored this mornings BM before I flushed it...

The left often uses death to advance their causes - its despicable

Having a pretty lucky day so far. Drove to Sevierville to do the Bass Pro/SMKW/Bud's tour this morning. I walked into Bass Pro and found a pound of IMR 4227 on the shelf along with a good selection of projectiles. Then went into Bud's and found CCI Subsonics, which I haven't seen on the shelf since Sandy Hook.   A quick review on Buds: I was really impressed. Great selection, friendly staff who could actually talk about guns and shooting. Lots of rifles and handguns, even a Saiga 12 at pre-hysteria pricing. They had some droolworthy items too: a Sako Finnlight in 6.5x55 and several Guncrafter No Name 1911s in 45 and 9mm. Tons of ammo including 22lr and 22mag and a decent selection of accessories. When they finish stocking up and get their range open the place is going to be incredible.

I need to quick being a slacker and get my arms around some reasonable method of water storage. 

LOL Ruger....smh   Those white tails cost a lot more money...

Actually I bought 400 Tula 223 today. Was looking for some steel case to buy rather than use up my supplies.

My goodness! This isn't easy. I've gotten in a lot of practice today, however. Thanks for posting. Mechanic_X has already destroyed this one, but I thought you all could laugh at it anyway. [url=http://s612.photobucket.com/user/gregintenn/media/5yd_zpsbcf48757.jpg.html][/URL] Here's my first effort at the 100 yard target. [url=http://s612.photobucket.com/user/gregintenn/media/100yd_zps27215583.jpg.html][/URL] As for the 50 yard target, I'm still working on it. I can barely see the tiny diamonds. You're welcome to laugh, giggle, or whatever at my feeble attempts here, but if you do, I ask that you post a picture of what a target should look like. [URL=http://s612.photobucket.com/user/gregintenn/media/50yd_zps46f41e3a.jpg.html][/URL] I give on the 50 yard target. Everywhere I've had my eyes checked, I'm told better than 20/20, but I simply can't see the tiny diamonds form that far. Let's see em guys!

Because it doesn't protect us in anyway shape or form here at home where it matters?  Nobody is going to invade this country...  the civilian population if too well armed, and if we'd repeal the Hughes Amendment we'd be ever better armed.   Here is one example of how you cut the military by a lot and not impact our ability to fight anybody who attacks us.   * With the exception of Pentagon, training commands - basic, and AIT, shutdown the entire active duty Army.  Move all the BCT of the current Active Duty Army and Reserves into the National Guard.  Remove the obvious overlaps...  Add 9-12 BCT's in addition to the Army/Reserve migration.   * Again with the exceptions of the Pentagon, NORAD/Space Command and training commands, move all Air Force, and Air Force Reserve units into the Air National Guard.  Removing all the overlapping commands.   Move dedicated CAS aircraft to the Army National Guard.  Move SIGINT/JSTAR/AWACs to the Navy, and Special Operations aircraft to JSOC/Navy.   * Double the size of the Marine Corp, closing down the Marine Corp Reserves in the process.  Move all fixed and rotary wing units to the Navy.   * Keep the Navy for the most part as is..  add 2 or 3 carrier groups to the current roster.   * Move JSOC into a true fifth branch of the military, move all JSOC attached units to that command and cutting the strings back to their home services completely, remove all overlapping training commands.   * Closed down all bases outside of US territory, create a limited number of joint bases with the Navy/Marines/host country.  The host country will provide the land/port free of charge and we'll build the infrastructure, and keep a complete war fighting package at each joint base to quickly respond to any threat.  Create 2 in Europe - Probably German/Poland and Italy/Turkey..  1 in Asia - South Korea, 1 Middle East - UEA/Qatar, 1 Africa - Djibouti, 2 Australia, 1 South America.  And no other bases Naval, or land base allowed without approval of congress.   * NG and ANG units would pull a 1 year tour at one of the above bases every 6 years to provide maintenance and security, Naval, Marine and JSOC units would be permanently stationed at these bases as well.   That closes over 900 foreign military bases, and drastically reduces the cost of the military...  and in no way shape or form reduces our ability to protect ourselves.   If we're attacked at home, we'd have plenty of training NG troops to engage the fight while we spun up military training of the civilian population..  If we were attacked here at home, but had to respond overseas, we'd have pre-positioned military assets, and a small force already in place ready to go until we could move forces from here to those bases and onto the war zone.   FYI, this plan would cut the cost of our current military by more than half.    

Question:  How big of a military do we need to protect us at home?   Answer: A lot smaller of a military than we'll have after these cuts.

The failed 'war on drugs' is the cause of most of our violent and property crime?   That poor urban ethnic male youths between the age of 15 and 25 cause the vast majority of said violent and property?  

In which case he should be looking for a new job. I am always on the lookout for potential threats, too. That doesn't mean I whip out Ol' Roscoe every time I see a gun on someone I don't know.

"A southern man don't need them around anyhow"

It is about money. The war is winding down. Each Army  division is loosing one Brigade Combat Team. The loss will be replace by a NG BCT that will become attached to that division for practical purposes. The war is winding down. A large standing Military cost money. The Reserves are cheaper.. This has happened after every war.   Majority of the worlds militaries or defense forces are small with a large reserve if needed. 

Not the first RIF (reduction in force) I have seen or lived thru. Always ends badly for our military down the road. A smaller force that does more with good training and equipment is always a dream of many but it never seems to work out that way.

Good, but a little disrespectful of the clowns don't you think.

Its just like the Clinton purges from the mid-late 90s.    Back then it was to "right-sized" the Army for the "peace dividend" that was suppose to pay down the national debt.  We know how well that money was spent! 

Of course he is removing as many high ranking military personnel as he can as fast as he can because he is scared to death of our military and any possible plans he has for our country in his last 2 + years in Office. He knows for a fact that most of or about 95%+ will not follow any orders he may give against the Civilian Americans that goes against any part of our Constitution or their moral aspects so he must find younger and more manipulative lower ranking officers that he can still brainwash into doing his deeds. All in all I think he is going to be hard pressed to find very many real men at all that will follow him when push comes to shove...........jmho 

They'd be better served teaching pants - sagging proud - to - be - hood idiots to talk. Southern drawl my a$$ at least we use real words!

Another informative video, particularly interesting for me since I don't own a saiga. Thanks for posting!

I think that's the best way to watch them because you can watch 3 or 4 episodes at a time. Watching from week to week always leaves me wanting more at the end of each episode.

Yeah. One time at Home Depot, I got made by a teenage girl, who went through a series of pantomimes to tell me she could see my gun. After ignoring her for about 5 rounds, I walked off, with my zipper still down. True story.

Government can't make any ex post facto laws, they can't give you data under public domain and then turn around sometime later and say the data is now prohibited.  Also, trying to force them to take the data down will result in a lawsuit that the state will loose over 1st amendment grounds.   If somebody illegally obtains and then provides the CA with all HCP permit holder records, they can publish it no matter what state law says.  (ie Pentagon Papers) The state could come after the person who obtained the information, but couldn't charge/file suit against the paper, or force them to take the information down.   And don't get mad at the paper over this, focus on the real root cause of the problem...  Why does the state need a list of law abiding citizens exercising their 2nd Amendment rights in the first place?  If the state didn't have the information to begin with the CA wouldn't have it either.